- Moderator
- #9,926
Basketball and Soccer have both had some enormous, significant changes to their rules and their style over time.
The problem the AFL has is that they are dealing with a supporter base wanting a return to the free flowing, high scoring product from an era where defensive strategy amounted to "beat your man". The game has matured so much defensively.
Basketball and Soccer aren't necessarily much older sports but they're so much more widely played and we're so much more professional earlier that they've tactically matured. Aussie rules is only just really getting there. Both sports have had pretty significant rule changes, they just happened a while ago.
Hell, if we want old style shootouts, we could always adopt the old NBA rule banning zone defence. Free kick against anyone marking grass and not a player. Welcome back 140-120 scorelines and 100 goal forwards.
The game will settle, and until then we'll still have fans demanding less defensive dross and simultaneously demanding no rule changes. The AFL will continue to tinker with the rules to try to achieve the best product they can while the coaches will focus on winning even if it's at the expense of the spectacle.
I think the issue is that we're getting the exact opposite of shootouts, we're getting games where defence is 95% on top. We need a better balance.
I think what the AFL needs to do is look back on some games in recent years that were high scoring. It's not that defence didn't exist in those games, it's that offence got on top at stages too. The Wingard Showdown springs to mind. What was it about that game that was different to how the game is played today? Work that out and then tweak accordingly.




