So you do mysogony as well.I'd go with dog.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So you do mysogony as well.I'd go with dog.
He is the fourth most accurate shot on goal playing today and overall the twelfth most accurate in the last 55 years, believe it or not.
It works as well, however we prefer to call it fiction. You should check it out one day, its on the other side of the library.Make believe is certainly a strong trait.
It works as well, however we prefer to call it fiction. You should check it out one day, its on the other side of the library.
I get frustrated because I cannot articulate my criticisms well enough and I get labeled racist as a result. We actually agree on a lot on the problems, but they are so obsessed with racial identity and collective guilt.
How is it a real stretch. Its ingrained in the club's culture isn't it?Snake, for all the flak you cop from some other posters, I love your work. Sensible, logical and reasonable.
Keep up the good fight. This insanity surely can't continue much longer.
There was a string of racist incidents, but to say it was/is SYSTEMIC is a real stretch.
That would have to show up in their stats at some point wouldn't it. That is elite goal kicking accuracy. And he's kicked nearly 100 goals. Wiull have before the season is out.I’d believe that. campaigner doesn’t miss.
How is it a real stretch. Its ingrained in the club's culture isn't it?
Even tho some of best friends are aboriginal this snakey campaigner says they are inferior to europeans from an evolutionary perspective. I'm glad you think that is sensible, logical and reasonable.
As much as I want to discuss the merit of both your posts as I usually do, I feel that I have derailed this thread enough for others, so I will decline continuing with the discussion.Structural, systemic and institutional racism are the same thing. People use different words to describe them cos not every conversation is an academic piece.
People bring up collective guilt and racial identity as a way of stopping action on the real problems of systemic or structural or procedural or institutional racism which are things like voter purging in the US, over policing and all of the associated legal and justice problems which is a truckload, etc etc. i dunno if its an instinctive defense of the status quo cos they don't believe in the problems or actually malicious. With voter purging there is bound to be some self interest that isn't necessarily racist ie not based on dislike for black people, more based on demographic manipulation.
Where to start Tef? It's abundantly clear that nobody is as invested in this report around here as you are. I'm still nor convinced you've properly read it, but assuming you have it's clear that your worldview has not allowed you to properly engage with the text. So far you've made only sweeping and frankly meaningless generalisations about it without providing any specific examples. Can you name any of the recommendations you have issue with?It's pure spin.
It doesn't name names and provide quotes.
You're so invested in this bullshit, that you can't see that it's bullshit.
What is a problem about Australia day for a lot of Australians who basically see Indigenous protests as being problematic is that we rob them of their virtue by our very presence and our protest. What we do to nationalism on this day is we bring into question the very formation of that nationalism so it doesn't make Australians feel very good. So in one sense Indigenous people become the killjoys of this national day of celebration.
To which I might add we are not included because Australia day is not about Indigenous peoples.
Where to start Tef?
Yep, the performance of actual critical thinking and engaging with the actual text. Sadly, it is an art that is in short supply.Don't bother. Your posts are performance art that have no rational basis.
Hang on, you told me you listen to other people’s views, just not mine. Yet here you are cutting someone off after the. Very first sentence.Don't bother. Your posts are performance art that have no rational basis.
If only the guy had a mirror so he could have a good hard look at himself.Yep, the performance of actual critical thinking and engaging with the actual text. Sadly, it is an art that is in short supply.
I think you know full well there is an entirely rational basis but for some reason I can't fathom you refuse to accept it. Instead you just want to throw out buzz words and clichés. I don't know of you really believe they are bon mots or stinging rebukes, but it is mindless drivel with no actual foundation in any reasoning or evidence.
No current season stats available
I would beleive it. He obviously learned to kick from a pretty good footing. Didn't carry any bad habits from junior days most likely.He is the fourth most accurate shot on goal playing today and overall the twelfth most accurate in the last 55 years, believe it or not.
stats are only ever indicative, they often dont take into account the full picture, for example if a player only ever took set shots from directly in front he would naturally have ( or should!) a better accuracy than someone whos lead patterns took him to the pockets for example. Buddys kicking from the boundary 50 out is exceptional but i doubt it would skew the goal/behinds metric markedly as he also seems to mis a few that could traditionally be deemed easier. Having said that it would be an injustice to claim mason cox wasnt a solid set shot player, levi casboult and recent jack ziebel could definitely take a leaf out of his book.Champion Data uses statistics the same way a drunk uses a lamp-post: for support, not illumination.
Larkey is the most accurate kick for goal in the last 55 years.Nick Larkey only kicked 2 more behinds than Cox but I don’t consider him elite.