- Thread starter
- #526
I guess we should just buy solar panels and tesla's and that will fix everything.
Global warming solved, next issue.
In the absence of a timetable for the aspirations
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I guess we should just buy solar panels and tesla's and that will fix everything.
Global warming solved, next issue.
I have, ive watched you think of everything bad that could possibly happen with renewables and im countering with bad things that have ACTUALLY happened with nuclear.Have a think about what you’re posting
death rate per unit of energy production
Yeah... no. Chernobyl caused thousands of incidents of cancer and, from what I can see, 2000+ deaths from that. The effects continue to this day though they are said to be constantly decreasing.Chernobyl had 78 deaths.
Through a late snapper mate of mine we hosted a bunch of kids from Chernobyl for an afternoon, we just put out a buffet, soft drinks, let them run amok in the beer garden. Already some of them were sick and a little over twenty years later I doubt a single of them is alive.Yeah... no. Chernobyl caused thousands of incidents of cancer and, from what I can see, 2000+ deaths from that. The effects continue to this day though they are said to be constantly decreasing.
Not to mention wiping out a chunk of the country from habitation.
Yeah... no. Chernobyl caused thousands of incidents of cancer and, from what I can see, 2000+ deaths from that. The effects continue to this day though they are said to be constantly decreasing.
Not to mention wiping out a chunk of the country from habitation.
It's incredibly dangerous.
You get that the modern designs are only as safe as the build quality and ongoing maintenance and support yeah?Is that why modern reactors don’t require safe working zones? As they can’t catch fire and can’t sustain critical without the moderating gas?
I don’t think anyone is advocating building 1950s or 60s Soviet designed reactors
You get that the modern designs are only as safe as the build quality and ongoing maintenance and support yeah?
We're still talking about a nuclear reactor
Thorium reactors cannot melt down.You get that the modern designs are only as safe as the build quality and ongoing maintenance and support yeah?
We're still talking about a nuclear reactor
You get that the modern designs are only as safe as the build quality and ongoing maintenance and support yeah?
We're still talking about a nuclear reactor
You get that the modern designs are only as safe as the build quality and ongoing maintenance and support yeah?
We're still talking about a nuclear reactor
The Australian Energy Market Operator has ordered two gas-fired power plants owned by Snowy Hydro in Victoria to shut down in a bid to keep the gas supply operating safely and securely at the correct pressure for customers.
The order, which lasts until October 1 and represents a further worsening of the energy crisis hitting the eastern states, came as Queensland’s three LNG exporters scrambled to meet a request from the AEMO on Wednesday to send more gas south to avoid shortages in power generation.
as-crisis-builds-20220720-p5b32u
String it out for as many pages as you can. Muddy all the water. You still lied.
Link to a reliable source that states this?
Not your interpretation of some random data.
Thorium reactors cannot melt down.
I have, ive watched you think of everything bad that could possibly happen with renewables and im countering with bad things that have ACTUALLY happened with nuclear.
Technically that is not true - the AUKUS subs will never exist in real life.modern uranium reactors are designed like thorium
they both breed fuel which is a far more efficient process when you take in the whole lifecycle
the reactors in the AUKUS subs will operate like this but you can achieve it just as well with 20% fuel as you can with 93%. Arguably 20% is better, as there is less waste.