Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Haven't heard much. Just that Sydney is pushing hard for North's pick 3 but I am sceptical as I have only heard that rumour on bigfooty.
I just don’t think that’s a good deal that future 1st is likely to be late teens too.Would Sydney be willing to offer 14+17+2023 1st (or 2nd) - That's probably what North would want.
I just don’t think that’s a good deal that future 1st is likely to be late teens too.
Whilst there is value in the number of picks the potential quality of a pick 3 has a far greater ceiling than three teens picks.
Then you run the risk of turning out like st Kilda (I don’t mean offence to any sainters) they have a lot of good players but they lack enough elite players to get over that hump. North were the same when we were in the finals.You'd have a huge intake of 1st rounders across a 2 year period though, I suppose if you drafted well you could turn it into a dynasty. I get what you're saying though.
I understand, that's fair.Then you run the risk of turning out like st Kilda (I don’t mean offence to any sainters) they have a lot of good players but they lack enough elite players to get over that hump. North were the same when we were in the finals.
I never think it’s a good idea to trade true premium picks (1-5) for a collection of not as good ones, you just pass up on the truly elite players, sure sometimes players slip but if teams have those picks above let an elite player slip it’s luck not good planning
Then you run the risk of turning out like st Kilda (I don’t mean offence to any sainters) they have a lot of good players but they lack enough elite players to get over that hump. North were the same when we were in the finals.
I never think it’s a good idea to trade true premium picks (1-5) for a collection of not as good ones, you just pass up on the truly elite players, sure sometimes players slip but if teams have those picks above let an elite player slip it’s luck not good planning
? Saints fan? I don’t mean that as an insult, I think you have many good players I just see similarities between current stk and the Roos of 2012-2016.
I wouldn’t want the same deal for pick 4.I just don’t think that’s a good deal that future 1st is likely to be late teens too.
Whilst there is value in the number of picks the potential quality of a pick 3 has a far greater ceiling than three teens picks.
What do think is a fair deal?
It’s fair. And the nicest thing we’ve heard for a week (actually about 3 months)? Saints fan? I don’t mean that as an insult, I think you have many good players I just see similarities between current stk and the Roos of 2012-2016.
Just needed a few more true elite players.
It would likely require 3 late firsts to get there (14, 17, F1), which I'm not sure they have an appetite for. I know most Hawks fans aren't too thrilled at the idea of 6 for 14+17 without some kind of substantial sweetener.Good info.
Sydney would need a top 6 pick for humphrey imo and they dont have the currency to get up that far imo.
It would likely require 3 late firsts to get there (14, 17, F1), which I'm not sure they have an appetite for. I know most Hawks fans aren't too thrilled at the idea of 6 for 14+17 without some kind of substantial sweetener.
Potentially:
14
17
F1
for:
4, 5, 6 (Humphrey)
Current or Future 2nd (Dons, WB via Hawks?)
It's a tough one, but if they really want him they'll find a way to get it done. Right now I'm not convinced they do, rather they want to see if they can get a steal for 14+17 since they don't rate that section of the draft.
The only offer I could see Sydney making is 14, 17 and our future first but I doubt that would be enough.
Isn't this your first pick inside the top 10 for a decade? I suspect Geelong's team is really keen to take it to draft
Isn't this your first pick inside the top 10 for a decade? I suspect Geelong's team is really keen to take it to draft
Would you make that deal for Pick 7 ?
The Hawks are moving up with their late picks and might move the WB F2 into this draft. This is straight from the horse's mouth, Sammy and Mark have said so in interviews after the trade period.
It's either that or try and grab Essendon Pick 22 through some future pick chicanery, I think I prefer to get 36 without giving up future picks. I think there's some really developable talent in the range in Long, Binns, Lemmey still has the bones of a star, Magor, D'Aloia, and a resident slider a la Draper or Taylor last year.Wouldn't be surprised to see Hawthorn use those late picks to trade up to Brisbane's 34 (probably give them 36 since it makes no difference anyway) when the bid for Ashcroft comes in.
I would take that for pick 6Would Sydney be willing to offer 14+17+2023 1st (or 2nd) - That's probably what North would want.
Only see that happening if Clark is not there at 7.I wouldn't be surprised if the Saints try a trade of picks with Geelong. (9 & 32 for 7 & 58)
Buzz might be the man the Cats are wanting… Stephen “smokescreen” Wellsyspecial lolOnly see that happening if Clark is not there at 7.
Not aure the saints would do that. Maybe a future second but definitely not a future firstEssendon indicating they'd trade down, and several clubs wanting to trade up, gives me the feeling if the player/s we want at the pointy end are off the board, then we will move down.
If Sheezel and Wardlaw are gone, I'd like a trade with the Saints
Pick 4 for their pick 9 and next years first.