She clarified her statement
I get what she was trying to say, but very clumsy way of putting it.
whoever the F she is.
on a personal note, I just found out an old elementary school student of mine has just been accepted by...Harvard
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
She clarified her statement
I get what she was trying to say, but very clumsy way of putting it.
100% agree on the legacy admissions, this should also be abolished, although I can't see that ever going. Too many 'gifts' to people in high places given from those families.
I did find this tweet interesting though:
Is she serious? Black people won't be able to succeed in a 'merit based system'. This is an incredibly demeaning thing to say from a former Biden team member I get that she's white-knighting on behalf of people who should be fighting for their own rights but she's basically said they're incapable compared to other races.
Is this what Democrats really think of Black Americans?
There is an argument to be made that any application panel member that had subconscious racial bias in the past, now have a few less checks and balances to impose that racial bias in application approvals.Incredibly poorly worded original tweet then and 'merit-based' back when affirmative actions was brought in had completely different meanings than in 2023.
If you're a high profile public figure, you might want to phrase your words in a way the majority of us plebs can easily understand, instead of making a post attempting to sound smart but simply coming off as someone who looks down on black people and their ability to be successful on their own without a leg-up.
Ah, true. I read a few comments on another site suggesting it was a parody account but a few others were claiming it was real.It is all over twitter that the Erica Marsh is a fake (AI bot) twitter account.
Like FKIf it is any consolation, I have been caught out in the past too.
I like AOC's plan to impeach them for perjury.
No , I want justice for judges who lie. Clarence Thomas is also an on the take right-wing sham of a hypocrite as you know.So you want a dictatorship just one that you support?
I want justice for judges who lie
Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch lied under oath to Congress about their views on Roe vs Wade.Which judge lied when?
Left wingers who didn't want to vote for Hilary in 2016. this is on you. We told you this would happen. You didn't care.
Uh, no. It was ******* obvious that the US was not willing to accept business as usual anymore. The DNC ensured Hillarys victory through superdelegates rather than popular support. Blaming voters for not supporting someone they do not support is utterly moronic and entitled. Americans know their system is broken. It's just that a decent chunk of them think fascism is the answer.Left wingers who didn't want to vote for Hilary in 2016. this is on you. We told you this would happen. You didn't care.
Thats just nonsense. None of whats happened with the surpreme court would be happening if hilary won. None of it. And while we couldnt determine the magnitude we all knew that allowing trump to win was bad for progressive policies and bad for the supreme court. And yet some on the left allowed it to happen despite knowing this was a big risk of occuring.Uh, no. It was ******* obvious that the US was not willing to accept business as usual anymore. The DNC ensured Hillarys victory through superdelegates rather than popular support. Blaming voters for not supporting someone they do not support is utterly moronic and entitled. Americans know their system is broken. It's just that a decent chunk of them think fascism is the answer.
If Trump wins again, it will be for the same reason. The DNC puts forward a candidate that has so thoroughly dissapointed and re-established a status quo that is already dead.
BTW, Trumpism was always going to surface in some form. In many ways it was already established with the teabaggers.
You don't get it.Thats just nonsense. None of whats happened with the surpreme court would be happening if hilary won. None of it. And while we couldnt determine the magnitude we all knew that allowing trump to win was bad for progressive policies and bad for the supreme court. And yet some on the left allowed it to happen despite knowing this was a big risk of occuring.
the left who choose not to vote for clinton in 2016 after she was the nominee can not pretend they had no influence back then like you have just tried in your post. They did have influence. This is the outcome.
instead they acted like a toddler who throws their ice cream on the floor because it didnt have chocolate topping on top like they wanted.
You don't get it.
Voters aren't interested in the status quo anymore. Voters aren't interested in voting for the lesser evil anymore. "Vote for me or my oponant will destroy America". What does that even mean anymore? They are disenfranchised. They are looking for something better.
You can keep blaming voters if you want tho. It doesn't matter.
He doesn't. Hes a fraud.Perhaps the question then becomes what does Trump represent that is “better” & how has a man who could be the poster boy for entitled self interest convinced the Joe average citizen that he cares about them or even more perplexing, a man who, not just doesn’t have Christian virtues but embodies all the 7 deadly sins command such an evangelical base?
Yes, but I think they go through the same confirmation processes first (so there would temporarily be only 8 SC judges)What happens if one of the judges is assassinated?
Do they just appoint a new judge?
Thats just nonsense. None of whats happened with the surpreme court would be happening if hilary won. None of it. And while we couldnt determine the magnitude we all knew that allowing trump to win was bad for progressive policies and bad for the supreme court. And yet some on the left allowed it to happen despite knowing this was a big risk of occuring.
the left who choose not to vote for clinton in 2016 after she was the nominee can not pretend they had no influence back then like you have just tried in your post. They did have influence. This is the outcome.
instead they acted like a toddler who throws their ice cream on the floor because it didnt have chocolate topping on top like they wanted.