Lore
Moderator ❀
- Dec 14, 2015
- 48,902
- 73,286
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Moderator
- #35
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Still beats drafting a smaller mid lolWhy does every mock draft have us taking a KPD (more often than not O'Sullivan)
baffles me how little people know our list
id love a runner that appears likely available at our pickStill beats drafting a smaller mid lol
Best player at that spot in the draft. Has played forward and kicked goals and has even had some midfield minutes. Is also much further developed than some of of pervious picks . It is not as dumb as it sounds . Yes we need a CHF . We could use some more class at half back for sure but long term I do not think the defense is in tip top shape. Reid can not get on the park. Cox is looking more like a tall half back than a KP player.Why does every mock draft have us taking a KPD (more often than not O'Sullivan)
baffles me how little people know our list
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Gregory is too early to say.
Had a fractured leg/fibula at the start of the year and came back too early, then got chickenpox which apparently really knocked him about.Any thoughts on the reason for the lack of consistency?
Do not know why I always think Hayes and end up with Gregory. Hope it is not a signHe hasn't been part of Essendon's crew since about 2014.
No current season stats available
Agree. If you want to take an inferior player on your talent board then you should absolutely trade back. We have to still take best talent at our pick regardless of positionBest player at that spot in the draft. Has played forward and kicked goals and has even had some midfield minutes. Is also much further developed than some of of pervious picks . It is not as dumb as it sounds . Yes we need a CHF . We could use some more class at half back for sure but long term I do not think the defense is in tip top shape. Reid can not get on the park. Cox is looking more like a tall half back than a KP player.GregoryHayes is too early to say. McKay is our hope at FB . Ridley intercept half back and Laverde could be upgraded. Comes down to if you want to take an inferior player to simply fill a spot.
I like him. I have no issue if we pick him .
Not sure there is a huge gap between 3 and 15 or so despite the top 8 seeming pretty stable opinion wise .After the top 8 selections, is there much of a gap between 9 and 19 in the draft? Thinking splitting 9 into two picks in the teens (ie North's picks) would be better.
So if we can't get up into 3 to nab Duursma, then what's the point of holding 9?Not sure there is a huge gap between 3 and 15 or so despite the top 8 seeming pretty stable opinion wise .
trouble is you are trading with clubs who have largely the same view of the draft as you, why would they give anything up for pick 9 if they're happy with their later first round picks?So if we can't get up into 3 to nab Duursma, then what's the point of holding 9?
Trade for a future 1st rounder or split picks into two in the teens
We should have been all over North for 15 + end of first compo when it was first given for pick 9trouble is you are trading with clubs who have largely the same view of the draft as you, why would they give anything up for pick 9 if they're happy with their later first round picks?
So if we can't get up into 3 to nab Duursma, then what's the point of holding 9?
Trade for a future 1st rounder or split picks into two in the teens
not necessarily, some mind want to bundle picks.trouble is you are trading with clubs who have largely the same view of the draft as you, why would they give anything up for pick 9 if they're happy with their later first round picks?
I do not think Dursma is massively in front either.So if we can't get up into 3 to nab Duursma, then what's the point of holding 9?
Trade for a future 1st rounder or split picks into two in the teens
It’s impossible to draft for durability, Selwood had an injury concern for his draft year and went on to be very durable. Gumbletons draft year went smoothly but his AFL career sure didn’tOne thing I will say is hope we draft someone with durability. Top picks not playing just kills you. Availability is the best ability which is why when you look at reid Cox perk.. I would say Perkins is the most valuable right now mainly because he has played and developed his game a fair bit.
I mean that's pure speculation and from the fact it hasn't yet happened one might conclude that one of those clubs decided that wasn't actually going to be in their favour.not necessarily, some mind want to bundle picks.
from a North POV, they might think #2 + #9 might be of more interest to WCE for #1 than #2 + 2x late first rounders
Maybe we were and maybe Norf said "lol no, wtf"We should have been all over North for 15 + end of first compo when it was first given for pick 9
I think Melbourne will/should take O'Sullivan if there.I do not think Dursma is massively in front either.
As far as what’s the point . I am on the fence . Taking two picks in the teens may just be better than using one at 9 and two in the thirties.
I actually like O’Sullivan but I am pretty much on my own as far as us taking him .
I’m sure now they have data on body types, make up etc and be able build some predictions around likely hood of soft tissue injuries and such. Obviously impact injures can’t predict that.It’s impossible to draft for durability, Selwood had an injury concern for his draft year and went on to be very durable. Gumbletons draft year went smoothly but his AFL career sure didn’t

Ask for a government grantI’m sure now they have data on body types, make up etc and be able build some predictions around likely hood of soft tissue injuries and such. Obviously impact injures can’t predict that.
Money is poured into sport science and talent identification if this is not something that is done or no one has been able to solve this yet maybe i need to tackle it![]()