Thanks. This is not what was happening here though.Them being "pressed too closely for sound arguments"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty AFLW Notice Img
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Thanks. This is not what was happening here though.Them being "pressed too closely for sound arguments"
I dont think that is correct. An umpire didn't pick it up.
It was voluntarily admitted by Finlayson at the break to officials. Finlayson said from his own mouth he knew it was wrong the second he did it and owned up to it.
This stuff doesn't happen all the time on the field - that is an assumption in the highest order by you.
I'm also not suggesting Finlayson should be sacked. I'm merely saying if he did this in another workplace he likely would be. he should be suspended though. Similar to what the NRL does for homophobic slurs.
I didn’t realise calling someone a ****** was a fundamental part of the sport
The Essendon players heard it and made the umpire aware at the time. That's what Langford said. At 3/4 time Finlayson reported it which is commendable but it was already known.
Kochy seemed to be running a line that it was all voluntered which is not really true. He didn't self report, just admitted he said it.
Anyway, I think a fine and maybe a game suspension.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
meh however it happened is a bit irrelevant. I think Finlayson has handled it as well as he could have. Seems to be genuinely sorry about it.
He said it and it needs to be dealt with in a sufficient manner. I think more than 1 game but that's just me. i personally like how the NRL dealt with it.
I think you’re right - I grew up in a very white/anglo Adelaide and the ONLY time it was used was by Poms describing the West Indian issue in the UK.I grew up in NSW (both out west in country towns with very high percentages of aboriginals, and then in Sydney) mid-70's onwards and while those latter two words were commonly used (along with others), the N word wasn't. Perhaps is a regional thing.
Oh dear. Let me leave you two with a quote from French philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre to reflect on:
“Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.”
What an ominous comment hahaI’ve changed my opinion of you, For what its worth.
Far too late for the ‘post police’.This is a thread on homosexual vilification, we are not discussing indigenous vilification as it is not relevant. Please stay on topic
What an ominous comment haha
What did it used to be, and what is it now?
They are not wrong. They are 100 percent right. It was commonly used to degrade Aboriginals.
Watch Footy Classified, Caro suggested it happens all the time, and two former players didn't deny it/correct her.This stuff doesn't happen all the time on the field - that is an assumption in the highest order by you.
Jesus get a grip. Its not a nice word, but 15 years ago it was a common insult towards anyone, not strictly homosexuals.Using his dying wife to cover for being a homophobe would be worse than the slur in thr first place.

Your opinion is more stupid.No it’s not. Your opinion is ******* stupid. Doesn’t even warrant rebuttal.
Then they’re wrong on all 3 counts. He won’t get 6 weeks. The penalty handed down will not be more severe because he is indigenous, or because he plays for Port. They’re obviously more paranoid than normal.I'm reading on the Port board that the AFL will give Finlayson 6 weeks just because he's Indigenous and plays for Port
This would be shocking if true!
SuperMal you seem to disagree that Aboriginals were regularly called the N word. They were and it was constant
Your opinion is more stupid.
That guy is dead right it's not the same. The word Tex used has been used exclusively to target non-whites, whereas this word was used very recently as a synonym for loser - whether or not that is OK or not is beside the point.
Yes JF should know better, yes times have changed, but overstating the severity here does nothing but belittle the 'victims' and their supporters.

Then they’re wrong on all 3 counts. He won’t get 6 weeks. The penalty handed down will not be more severe because he is indigenous, or because he plays for Port. They’re obviously more paranoid than normal.
If anyone is seriously running the provocation defence, then they’re wrong again.I see. They're claiming it's okay because he was provoked though.
Uh oh - I'll have to report this back to the Port boardIf anyone is seriously running the provocation defence, then they’re wrong again.
Yokels still trying to argue that calling someone short is as bad as the n word or “pile of sticks” lmao.