Aussie Tall poppy syndrome at its finest!Zero weeks, which is the correct call. Normal football play, no one was injured, Geelong haters in hysterics, business as usual.
View attachment 2385879
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Aussie Tall poppy syndrome at its finest!Zero weeks, which is the correct call. Normal football play, no one was injured, Geelong haters in hysterics, business as usual.
View attachment 2385879
So you want players suspended for leaping for a smother and knocking someone on the shoulder ??The rule is a shit one and the MRO interpretation of it makes it even more farcical. You either want that action out of the game or you don’t. Once they decided that they didn’t want players jumping to spoil and landing on the oncoming kicker, they are then obligated to charge obvious cases of it like this. Giving out a minor fine isn’t deterring anyone.
No, I think the rule is ridiculous and he shouldn’t be penalised at all. The afl think differently though and they made a very clear rule to stop it. Now they have that rule in place, this very clear example of a player breaking it should have been punished.So you want players suspended for leaping for a smother and knocking someone in the shoulder ??
It would be a first.
Some Richmond supporters. And a few chip on the shoulder gang.Who will be taking it to the tribunal?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
So you want players suspended for leaping for a smother and knocking someone on the shoulder ??
It would be a first.
Can still be graded high contact if head not impacted; it's anything including and above shouldersIt was graded as high contact, just low impact
In what way did he take steps to ensure he hit the shoulder and not the head. Isn’t he just lucky that that’s what happened?My opinion is he got the fine because the smother and subsequent collision was a bit reckless. The AFL don't want players charging head on at other players to smother and then botching it and hurting them.
It was nothing more that a fine because his reasonable steps included ensuring he hit the shoulder, not the head (I didn't realise he missed the head until I just watched a replay then)
Seems a pretty reasonable outcome all in all though many might disagree.
What a strange decision. I'm no Geelong 'hater' and couldn't care less about TS being suspeneded or not - but please MRO, follow your own table, with common sense.
If he did nothing wrong as everyone at Geelong has said why is he getting a fine? Also why did he need to jump in the air to smother and what are these ‘reasonable steps’ he took to avoid the collision? Don’t jump down my throat, I’m just asking.
Kind of like Melbourne getting penalised for not tanking. The AFL makes shit up.
If that was Toby Greene we all know he is getting 2 weeks.
Better luck next time, FalconVery similar to the Maynard v Brayshaw incident except Stewart collected Wines head with his hip, not his shoulder. You could say this incident won't end a player's career but it wasn't just the Maynard collision that caused Brayshaw's retirement, it was the accumulation of concussions.
What say the collective brains of Bigfooty, all 7 of you?

Like earlier in the year when Toby Greene left the ground to stop Reef McInnes hand balling over the top and kneed him in the ribs and didn’t get cited.
At least try and think before you write this stuff.
Stewart didnt hit him in the ribs. But nice attempted deflection
No, they didnt make a rule about players jumping to smother and knocking someone on the shoulder, they made a rule about jumping up and hitting the head and concussing. Neither happenedNo, I think the rule is ridiculous and he shouldn’t be penalised at all. The afl think differently though and they made a very clear rule to stop it. Now they have that rule in place, this very clear example of a player breaking it should have been punished.
“all the time”?Good bloke Tommy Stewart just really clumsy, all the time. Would never do anything intentional. He’s just coincidentally involved in hits like this (all the time). Such a good bloke. Just ask his coach.
The point is you can't use "But I was going for the ball" as an excuse to clatter into someone's head any more. It could be the perfect smother, its irrelevant if he also lands on Wine's head.Where did he think he should have gone to get the ball that Wines was hand passing over him - to ground? F**k I genuinely question what goes through the heads of some people when they post this stuff sometimes
Fair cop. I thought it was line ball between a week and a fine based on impact.Who will be taking it to the tribunal?
Why would anyone be suspended for knocking the shoulder?? Suspension is head contact and or concussion. It would be an AFL first if a player got suspended for knocking the shoulder without a concussionThe point is you can't use "But I was going for the ball" as an excuse to clatter into someone's head any more. It could be the perfect smother, its irrelevant if he also lands on Wine's head.
Fair cop. I thought it was line ball between a week and a fine based on impact.