Remove this Banner Ad

Rumour Bluemour Discussion XLI

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

#BUMP from February


Re: 'Alleged' rumours resurfacing ...



Folks, this is the way things are here.

Posters are responsible for what they post. Moderators can not attest to the accuracy or otherwise of any rumour posted.

Moderators will intervene for a couple of reasons.

1. If a thread is threatening to be derailed because of a post.

2. If invested parties request the removal of material.

None of this draws a conclusion as to the accuracy or otherwise of the original post.

There is no need to further speculate. What will be will be.


Also, you need to remember that this thread like all parts of this forum is bound by the rules of poster conduct. If you want to express skepticism towards a rumour that's fine, but having a crack at posters who are contributors to this forum is simply not on and will be acted upon.

Simply put, don't be a dick.

Thanks all!
 
sorry i forgot about the covid year lol but my point still stands… charlie will be 2 years older than jeremy cameron was and he was the giants leading goal scorer for his entire career. He won the coleman the year they made the granny. What im trying to say is cameron is twice the player charlie is.

Cameron was 27 going on 28. There is 14 months difference between their ages at the time. Both were 2 time AAs at the time of trade. Charlie had 2 Coleman's to Cameron's 1.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

My feeling is that we were never going to hold Curnow to his contract - Sydney know that and they know we’re going to blink instead of adding to the deal as deadline grows closer- Sydney are taking away from the deal.
 
I'm going to sit in denial for the moment that we will fold for only one first rounder.
GW and CD won't want their introduction to the members being bent over at the trade table in the first month.
Still feel like if it’s only one pick in the deal, then there is more going on with other clubs.
Just can’t see wright, Davies and Austin caving.
 
I’m going to hold my breath on saying anything else, but if that’s the deal we get for Charlie and pick 10 and 11 are used to get up the draft order, Voss might as well hand in his resignation tomorrow. We can’t rely on the kids we bring in to do enough to help him keep his job next year, and a couple of role players even good ones like Hayward won’t be enough to mitigate our overall losses in 2026. Say what you will about their shortcomings but at his best Charlie is still a 60 goal forward, tdk was still miles better than pitto or reidy and jsos still came equal 9th in our b&f from 13 bloody games
Its about a team, not individuals. What's this 60 goal a season done for us in 10 years at the club? Seriously. Charlie's worth is being massively oversold
 

Remove this Banner Ad

My feeling is that we were never going to hold Curnow to his contract - Sydney know that and they know we’re going to blink instead of adding to the deal as deadline grows closer- Sydney are taking away from the deal.
I trust Wright to do well here. He has the final say on any deal apparently. He learned under a hard nosed board at Hawthorn and was quite ruthless there.
 
I trust Wright to do well here. He has the final say on any deal apparently. He learned under a hard nosed board at Hawthorn and was quite ruthless there.
I do wonder whether we are hearing the Sydney offer (ie one first etc) as opposed to the final deal, which will be sorted over the next 33hrs...

33 ****ing hours..
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Then why would we agree with another day left?

Doesn't make sense unless we've caved in which would go against the whole narrative...

Just have to wait and see I suppose...

Because i believe the club want Charlie gone in this trade window. I genuinely dont believe that the club wants Charlie to stay
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Rumour Bluemour Discussion XLI

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top