Remove this Banner Ad

Play Nice 47th President of the United States: Donald Trump - Part 22: Insert Blame Here

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

<-- Part 21 "Alien vs Predator" can be found here.

Mod Notice

Thread monitored proactively. Users who drag it down will be removed. REPORT posts. Don't exacerbate.Specifically: reference to TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome), 'Trumpanzee' or similar are longer allowed.Personal attacks are also to be kept to a minimum.
<- 2024 Election Thread<- Kamala Harris Concedes<-- See Part 21.

This thread is not about Covid, lockdowns, or vaccines. While Trump was in office during the pandemic and his response to Covid is relevant, there are pertinent threads for you to post your opinions on those topics.

On SRP you are responsible for backing up/verifying your claims to fact. What this means is that you will be asked time to time to support your claims with evidence, to ensure that this forum is as free of misinfomation as we can make it.

Do not post conspiracy theories on this forum. We have an entire other forum for that.
Thanks all.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

<<<BREAKING: MELTDOWN — White House NOW ADMITS that the second Venezuela boat strike happened and that Hegseth “AUTHORIZED" it.

In an absolutely wild White House briefing that left reporters rubbing their temples, Press Secretary Caroline Leavitt essentially confirmed what the administration has spent weeks screaming was “fake news” and admitted that the second U.S. strike in Venezuela did happen.

And in true Trump-era fashion, she paired the admission with a breathtaking attempt to rewrite who pulled the trigger.

It began when NBC News’s Gabe Gutierrez pressed her to clarify the details of the strike, asking: “Does the administration deny that that second strike happened, or did it happen and the administration denies that Secretary Hegseth gave the order?”

In response, Leavitt dropped the bombshell — “The latter is true.”

In other words: Yes, the strike happened — and no, the President’s handpicked Secretary didn’t tell Trump the truth about it.

Leavitt then launched into a defensive monologue straight out of a late-night propaganda special, insisting that “narco-terrorists” designated by Trump can be lethally targeted at will, and revealing that Hegseth had actually authorized Admiral Bradley to conduct the attack.

So let’s recap the chaos:
• Trump told America there was no second strike.
• Hegseth denied it, calling reports “fabricated.”
• The White House now says the strike absolutely happened.
• And instead of admitting the President lied, they’re throwing Hegseth under the bus to clean up the mess.

All while Leavitt waved around talking points about fentanyl — and the “record-rate” of American deaths from the drug — like a magician distracting the crowd while the rabbit escapes.

This is what happens when an administration tries to run U.S. foreign policy like a cable-news segment: confusion, contradictions, and total contempt for the truth.

Stay tuned — because when the White House can’t even agree on who blew up what, the cover-up is usually just getting started.

Please like and share to spread the news!>>>
 
Hesgeth the next one to be thrown under the Epstein driven bus?
Trump admires his ‘look’ and ability to BS but WH don’t like him - since blindsiding them during the transition: “Is there anything in your background we need to be aware of?”

Hasn’t stopped WH now throwing Adm Bradbury ‘under the bus’.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

<<<BREAKING: MELTDOWN — White House NOW ADMITS that the second Venezuela boat strike happened and that Hegseth “AUTHORIZED" it.

In an absolutely wild White House briefing that left reporters rubbing their temples, Press Secretary Caroline Leavitt essentially confirmed what the administration has spent weeks screaming was “fake news” and admitted that the second U.S. strike in Venezuela did happen.

And in true Trump-era fashion, she paired the admission with a breathtaking attempt to rewrite who pulled the trigger.

It began when NBC News’s Gabe Gutierrez pressed her to clarify the details of the strike, asking: “Does the administration deny that that second strike happened, or did it happen and the administration denies that Secretary Hegseth gave the order?”

In response, Leavitt dropped the bombshell — “The latter is true.”

In other words: Yes, the strike happened — and no, the President’s handpicked Secretary didn’t tell Trump the truth about it.

Leavitt then launched into a defensive monologue straight out of a late-night propaganda special, insisting that “narco-terrorists” designated by Trump can be lethally targeted at will, and revealing that Hegseth had actually authorized Admiral Bradley to conduct the attack.

So let’s recap the chaos:
• Trump told America there was no second strike.
• Hegseth denied it, calling reports “fabricated.”
• The White House now says the strike absolutely happened.
• And instead of admitting the President lied, they’re throwing Hegseth under the bus to clean up the mess.

All while Leavitt waved around talking points about fentanyl — and the “record-rate” of American deaths from the drug — like a magician distracting the crowd while the rabbit escapes.

This is what happens when an administration tries to run U.S. foreign policy like a cable-news segment: confusion, contradictions, and total contempt for the truth.

Stay tuned — because when the White House can’t even agree on who blew up what, the cover-up is usually just getting started.

Please like and share to spread the news!>>>
Standard Trumpy behaviour. Hegseth gave a general order, but it was the Admiral alone who decided to blow up survivors who obviously posed no risk to America, floating on a pile of debris clinging for their lives.

Now, the Admiral has to keep quiet and everyone thinks he's a murderer, or speak out and be fired. This is what following illegal orders will get you. And it's why the Trump admin pressures people so much to follow illegal orders. As soon as you follow the illegal order, they can pin it all on you. You're the one pulling the trigger and you'd be the one having to convince a jury that you obeyed an illegal order, but it was your bosses fault. Good luck proving it.
 
Sitting at just under $20 billion annually, Australia's Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme is one of the biggest and fastest growing costs in the Federal Government's Health budget.

It's the most comprehensive pharmaceutical cost subsidy scheme anywhere in the world and a lot of that money is spent to subsidise the cost of US licensed pharmaceuticals.

Overnight a deal was struck between to US and UK Governments for the UK National Health Service to pay 25% more for US sourced 'innovative' drugs as part of a tariff deal that will add will cost the NHS an estimated additional £3bn a year.



Bet your bottom dollar Australia's PBS scheme is in the White House sights for a similar “Trump Takedown” and the impact on the Federal budget, not to mention those needing financial help to pay for cutting edge drugs to treat various cancers and chronic health conditions, will be immense.
 
Trump's physician claiming that Trump is in 'perfect overall health' is simply laughable. Health experts noting that no one has two MRIs done in six months for 'preventative reasons'.

View attachment 2489264

Yes folks this is what 'excellent overall health' looks like:

View attachment 2489272
Possibly he moved too much and made the first mri useless for diagnostic purposes
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Standard Trumpy behaviour. Hegseth gave a general order, but it was the Admiral alone who decided to blow up survivors who obviously posed no risk to America, floating on a pile of debris clinging for their lives.

Now, the Admiral has to keep quiet and everyone thinks he's a murderer, or speak out and be fired. This is what following illegal orders will get you. And it's why the Trump admin pressures people so much to follow illegal orders. As soon as you follow the illegal order, they can pin it all on you. You're the one pulling the trigger and you'd be the one having to convince a jury that you obeyed an illegal order, but it was your bosses fault. Good luck proving it.
You've just made this whole thing up based on your imagination. How do you know they were 'floating on a pile of debris clinging for their lives.'?

And you have no idea if the order was illegal. You think it 'may' be illegal but you have no real evidence for that. Then you extrapolate all that into the Admiral being forced to keep quiet (how?), murder charges, juries and what not.

Its all just hyperbolic projection.
 
Sitting at just under $20 billion annually, Australia's Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme is one of the biggest and fastest growing costs in the Federal Government's Health budget.

It's the most comprehensive pharmaceutical cost subsidy scheme anywhere in the world and a lot of that money is spent to subsidise the cost of US licensed pharmaceuticals.

Overnight a deal was struck between to US and UK Governments for the UK National Health Service to pay 25% more for US sourced 'innovative' drugs as part of a tariff deal that will add will cost the NHS an estimated additional £3bn a year.



Bet your bottom dollar Australia's PBS scheme is in the White House sights for a similar “Trump Takedown” and the impact on the Federal budget, not to mention those needing financial help to pay for cutting edge drugs to treat various cancers and chronic health conditions, will be immense.
Where are all those "how is Trump affecting your life in Australia" nuts now???
 
You've just made this whole thing up based on your imagination. How do you know they were 'floating on a pile of debris clinging for their lives.'?

And you have no idea if the order was illegal. You think it 'may' be illegal but you have no real evidence for that. Then you extrapolate all that into the Admiral being forced to keep quiet (how?), murder charges, juries and what not.

Its all just hyperbolic projection.
It's flimsy enough that the "narco-terrorists" pose a threat to the USA. But after the boat has been hit by a missile, do they still pose a threat to the USA? If not, then it's illegal to attack them in international waters.
 
Sitting at just under $20 billion annually, Australia's Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme is one of the biggest and fastest growing costs in the Federal Government's Health budget.

It's the most comprehensive pharmaceutical cost subsidy scheme anywhere in the world and a lot of that money is spent to subsidise the cost of US licensed pharmaceuticals.

Overnight a deal was struck between to US and UK Governments for the UK National Health Service to pay 25% more for US sourced 'innovative' drugs as part of a tariff deal that will add will cost the NHS an estimated additional £3bn a year.



Bet your bottom dollar Australia's PBS scheme is in the White House sights for a similar “Trump Takedown” and the impact on the Federal budget, not to mention those needing financial help to pay for cutting edge drugs to treat various cancers and chronic health conditions, will be immense.
No idea why other countries don't produce medicines? F**k the parasite US companies away and send them broke. Better off having a deal with European producers or something like that. Most drugs are not that expensive to produce, but US companies care more for profits over lives and marked them up loads.
 
Last edited:
You've just made this whole thing up based on your imagination. How do you know they were 'floating on a pile of debris clinging for their lives.'?

And you have no idea if the order was illegal. You think it 'may' be illegal but you have no real evidence for that. Then you extrapolate all that into the Admiral being forced to keep quiet (how?), murder charges, juries and what not.

Its all just hyperbolic projection.
What would you do if the boat you were on just exploded in the ocean and you survived but were injured?

It's a pretty safe assumption.

As is shooting injured people is illegal.
 
It's flimsy enough that the "narco-terrorists" pose a threat to the USA. But after the boat has been hit by a missile, do they still pose a threat to the USA? If not, then it's illegal to attack them in international waters.
If they are classified as terrorists, then Yes it can be argued that they still pose a threat.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Play Nice 47th President of the United States: Donald Trump - Part 22: Insert Blame Here

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top