- Joined
- Mar 20, 2007
- Posts
- 32,521
- Reaction score
- 32,593
- AFL Club
- West Coast
If you want to talk about sliding door moments for the season, how about Max losing the plot in Spain driving into Russell.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Just miss out on all the strategy calls that end up being crucial in a title fight decided by so little.I think the whole "number one/number two" driver stuff is a tad overrated. It often is used to describe drivers that were constantly in support roles because they weren't as good as their teammate (i.e Bottas, Perez, Webber, Barrichello etc..).
A lot of people would have considered Rosberg a number two driver in 2016, and he won it. No reason why Piastri can't come back and beat Norris next year (whether it is a title contending car though is the bigger question mark). I think Piastri at his quickest is a very good match for Norris at his quickest.
Because he started on the hard tyre, so was always going to go longer with the aim of having a better tyre at the end?Just miss out on all the strategy calls that end up being crucial in a title fight decided by so little.
Like tonight, why didn’t Oscar get the first pit stop? He was still in the fight at that point if he caught Max and Lando crashed.
A few races back Lando got given a Hail Mary strategy and it worked. So why was Oscars strategy today to just roll over and take it.
Come on now, he’s been screwed over plenty on strategy calls throughout the season but if your relying on a DNF and a big gap to close on Max vs just needing to cover off other drivers to maintain a podium position. I think it’s a pretty easy choice of who gets the preferential treatment in this race.Just miss out on all the strategy calls that end up being crucial in a title fight decided by so little.
Like tonight, why didn’t Oscar get the first pit stop? He was still in the fight at that point if he caught Max and Lando crashed.
A few races back Lando got given a Hail Mary strategy and it worked. So why was Oscars strategy today to just roll over and take it.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
A better tyre for what though? By the time he came in the gap was 25 seconds in 15 laps.Because he started on the hard tyre, so was always going to go longer with the aim of having a better tyre at the end?
And at that stage I don't know how many were thinking of a 2 stopper, which ultimately would have been what Oscar had to do.
Yeh I said at the start of the race, starting on the Hard is rarely a good strategy. But as soon as they made that call to start him on the hard, they were always unlikely to bring him in ahead of the medium runners unless there was consensus it was a guaranteed 2 stopper (which I dont think there was).A better tyre for what though? By the time he came in the gap was 25 seconds in 15 laps.
Race till the finish line though. If you’re in second you should get to make the call.Come on now, he’s been screwed over plenty on strategy calls throughout the season but if your relying on a DNF and a big gap to close on Max vs just needing to cover off other drivers to maintain a podium position. I think it’s a pretty easy choice of who gets the preferential treatment in this race.
It was a boring race. Dull. Nothing really happenedThe one thing Lando wants is a boring race. I’m sure Max knows this and RBR will do whatever they can to cause some mayhem.
Put back in the engine failure at Zaandvoort and he is back ahead of Oscar
(see how this is a silly exercise?)
As good as Piastri lap 1 overtake was it was evident then that Norris was content for 3rd. Still reckon it was the wrong strategy, but McLaren wanting Piastri to chase down Verstappen was the opposite of what he needed to do to make the hard tyre strategy work, which was to drive slower to maximise tyre life and compress the field behind him.
Isn't he Dutch though, not Hungarian...Oscar needs to ask Max how to be a hungry prick here.
The misfortune Piastri suffered with strategy at Imola, Hungary, and Qatar was been more than cancelled out by Norris's engine failure at Holland, slowpit stop at Baku, and first lap DNF during the Austin Sprint. Norris also lost more points from the Vegas DQ. Yet Norris still finished 13 points ahead of Piastri.
Our boy just wasn't good enough.
History will go around in circles talking about the points won and lost between the MCL drivers but for mine the crushing moment for Oscar was Azerbaijan Qualifying, the messed up start and bottling.
Oscar could go anywhere next year but will still be the #2 driver unfortunately. F1 is so cruel in that manner as the politics always wins. Oscar is better off staying at Mclaren next year incase Lando has a "premiership hangover" and the door opens up for him to take an championship win pending the new cars and regulations.
Oscar might like to use that moment but McLaren didn't force him to crash at Baku. If that's what caused the run of poor form, Oscar needs to learn from that big time. Monza was just one race, he still had control at that time and then let it slip badly with his performance at Baku.Piastri has been open and said that the Baku disaster was a result of the **** up at Monza. That's where it all started going wrong for OP....and it was MCL that ****ed up and should never have asked him to let Lando by.