- Joined
- Sep 18, 2003
- Posts
- 7,447
- Reaction score
- 7,889
- Location
- Sydney
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- TIGERS
No. Here's why. I can expand on all of these points.
#1. Rebuilds don't work. The draft is not a viable way to re-build your club in the F/S, NGA and Northern Academy era.
#2. Collingwood is a destination club for mid-career players drafted to non-Vic clubs, We have brought in Bobby Hill, Dan Houston, Lachie Schulz and a few others as good examples of this. That is a Norm Smith Medalist and a few All Australian Blazers.
#3. We have too many good players, the Daicos brothers, Maynard, Schulz, Houston, Hill, Moore, Quaynor, Elliot etc etc. This is a club that has gone 17th - Prelim - Flag - 9th - Prelim - why would they gut their list to dwell at the bottom where there is no prospect of getting the best players anyway? There is no chance Collingwood would get a priority pick anyway so the draft is useless.
#4 Tassie. Rebuilding when you have an expansion club entering the comp is a recipe for disaster.
Midfields with tremendous depth are what wins flags along with excellent backlines and potent forward lines. Your midfield (other than Daicos) is far from where it needs to be. Ok we can include Josh in there alongside Nick. I struggle to see how the others will step up other than being role players. Daicos can't carry them all. Your backline (and structure) is good but was found out in the last third of last year.
Your forward line is average. Membrey and McStay as your key forwards...nothing more needs to be said. Your forward line was the worst of the top sides by hundreds of points last year and you lost the key structure forward (Mihocek) who also kicked 30+ goals last year.
And Hill is an unlikely starter for this year from what I am hearing. And he's key to your run and carry game.
Put aside your average forward line for now. Where is your excellent - very good midfield depth coming from? Moneyball?? I don't think so.








