Mega Thread 2014 FA, Trades, Rumours and Facts (pre-draft thread).

[Babylove]

If we do get 5 & Redden, what are the chances that Hine will try to upgrade pick 5 to get us closer to the nose of the draft?

 

[Rusty22]

redden 78% de

 

[TradeDraft]

Redden was taken about 3 Picks ahead of Beams in the 2008 Draft

 

[mike123]

Who's better Rich or Redden?

 

[Tbone McGraw]

Actually i would give Beams and our 2nd round pick for Redden and 4.

However, no chance as Redden is very good.

 

[gtrain23]

Just watched some highlights of redden
Looks like he loves to kick a good sausage roll.
Maybe his good mates with karnezis

 

[Tbone McGraw]

Who's better Rich or Redden?

Tough but i would prefer redden. Rich would also help us but coming off 2 knee ops.

 

[Bay Pie]

We won't get that straight out. If Redden and 5 come our way 30 will go there's at a minimum.

Out of interest if it were Redden that came down where would he fit in the hearts and minds of Pies fans? It's more to get a quick glance, but he would reach Luke Ball status very quickly in my eyes. The kids a gun!

Quality player. Lacks real class and polish and is more an accumulator of possessions than being real damaging but he has a red hot go and will quickly win the hearts of Pie fans. How we adopted Bally would be very similar for Redden.

This would be a death knell type deal. Brisbane will explore all other options before pulling the trigger on this. But they have to pull the trigger by Friday, we don't have to trade Beam$ at all or until Friday week.

 

[TradeDraft]

Who's better Rich or Redden?

Rich = Lethal Left Foot Kick

 

[boxy99]

Rich can't break a tag

 

[Jonno94]

Would be fine with 5 and Redden, but would push for 5 and Aish with our 2nd rounder.

 

[mike123]

I'd rather rich than Redden as we have Taylor Adams so I don't we really need Redden. Rich is an elite kick, enough said.

 

[mike123]

Rich can't break a tag

But who's going to tag Rich over Pendlebury or Sidebottom. Besides id they tag Rich Sidebottom and Pendlebury will e off the chain.

 

[Bert Man]

Hey Guys,

Hoping I can add some thought and insight with this post. Personally, I would be devastated to lose Redden. Needless to say Beams is the better player. However, whilst saying that I would not incorporate Redden into the trade. The article has no substance to it IMO and is just throwing Redden's name there for the sake of it from my point of view. No source to suggest anything of substance.

I think that the clubs need to involve a third party. It is unlikely that either club will compromise. This makes the Greenwood option so logical to me. He replaces Beams immediately and you would get pick 5 and potentially later picks.

Both clubs are within their rights to be reluctant to part with a valuable member of their respective teams.

 

[boxy99]

But who's going to tag Rich over Pendlebury or Sidebottom. Besides id they tag Rich Sidebottom and Pendlebury will e off the chain.

No one will tag sidebottom mate

 

[mike123]

No one will tag sidebottom mate

Good

 

[gtrain23]

Hey Guys,

Hoping I can add some thought and insight with this post. Personally, I would be devastated to lose Redden. Needless to say Beams is the better player. However, whilst saying that I would not incorporate Redden into the trade. The article has no substance to it IMO and is just throwing Redden's name there for the sake of it from my point of view. No source to suggest anything of substance.

I think that the clubs need to involve a third party. It is unlikely that either club will compromise. This makes the Greenwood option so logical to me. He replaces Beams immediately and you would get pick 5 and potentially later picks.

Both clubs are within their rights to be reluctant to part with a valuable member of their respective teams.

**** off

 

[Baird]

Would be stoked with pick 5 and Redden. Unlikely though.

 

[boxy99]

Hey Guys,

Hoping I can add some thought and insight with this post. Personally, I would be devastated to lose Redden. Needless to say Beams is the better player. However, whilst saying that I would not incorporate Redden into the trade. The article has no substance to it IMO and is just throwing Redden's name there for the sake of it from my point of view. No source to suggest anything of substance.

I think that the clubs need to involve a third party. It is unlikely that either club will compromise. This makes the Greenwood option so logical to me. He replaces Beams immediately and you would get pick 5 and potentially later picks.

Both clubs are within their rights to be reluctant to part with a valuable member of their respective teams.

We won't budge mate we might next year we will try then

 

[Unknown Identity]

If we get Redden and Greenwood i will be doing the happy dance..

Pendlebury, Swan, Redden, Greenwood, Adams, Sidebottom, Freeman

That depth!

Looks like Kennedy is the sub again.

 

[Crazy Tails]

Just watched some highlights of redden
Looks like he loves to kick a good sausage roll.
Maybe his good mates with karnezis

Not a huge goal kicker 50 goals in 112 games compared to Beams 118 goals in 110 games.

Good height for a mid though at 189cm. Injured this year for 14 games (ave 25 disp) but 22 games in both '13 and '12 ave over 22 disp.

Would be a good get.

 

[mike123]

**** off

That was a bit over the top.

 

[Shaneprice97]

Hey Guys,

Hoping I can add some thought and insight with this post. Personally, I would be devastated to lose Redden. Needless to say Beams is the better player. However, whilst saying that I would not incorporate Redden into the trade. The article has no substance to it IMO and is just throwing Redden's name there for the sake of it from my point of view. No source to suggest anything of substance.

I think that the clubs need to involve a third party. It is unlikely that either club will compromise. This makes the Greenwood option so logical to me. He replaces Beams immediately and you would get pick 5 and potentially later picks.

Both clubs are within their rights to be reluctant to part with a valuable member of their respective teams.

Thats a nice view of yours

 

[ottoman]

Hey Guys,

Hoping I can add some thought and insight with this post. Personally, I would be devastated to lose Redden. Needless to say Beams is the better player. However, whilst saying that I would not incorporate Redden into the trade. The article has no substance to it IMO and is just throwing Redden's name there for the sake of it from my point of view. No source to suggest anything of substance.

I think that the clubs need to involve a third party. It is unlikely that either club will compromise. This makes the Greenwood option so logical to me. He replaces Beams immediately and you would get pick 5 and potentially later picks.

Both clubs are within their rights to be reluctant to part with a valuable member of their respective teams.

Right now as we speak the Collingwood football club is working on poaching one of your players. In the next few days one of your guys is going to ask to be traded.
Schwab will save face because he can say "the player requested it, if he hadn't we would not have let him go" and we will get our man.
What does it take to stop your supporters from being delusional. Everything has a price an in order to get it you pay the price.
We are not about to sell you a pristine BMW for 19.99

 

[Bert Man]

**** off

What did I say that was wrong?

I am not being malicious. I just want a good discussion.