Remove this Banner Ad

2014 Non Eagles Discussions Thread

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sounds like there was a known risk of this going into the preseason, wonder if that affected our willingness to trade picks?

No more so than Scharenberg wasn't the type of player we were after at this point in time.
If he'd been what we were after then I'm sure we would've selected him.
Pre-injury he was considered a likely top 2 pick.
Collingwood can afford for him to take 12+ months getting better (and any club taking him would've anticipated that).
 
Anybody thinking this is do or die for Bucks and the maggies. Not only for his current situation but as a senior coach in the future ?? I really cant see him getting another year out at Collingwood.
 
Anybody thinking this is do or die for Bucks and the maggies. Not only for his current situation but as a senior coach in the future ?? I really cant see him getting another year out at Collingwood.

While the kids aren't bad I'd be quite concerned about the fact that you cannot possibly get any more output from Swan or Pendlebury.
If these guys slow down at all their midfield will quickly go from competitive to below average.
Their backline has some issues and will be exposed without a competitive midfield.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Anybody thinking this is do or die for Bucks and the maggies. Not only for his current situation but as a senior coach in the future ?? I really cant see him getting another year out at Collingwood.
I'm pretty sure it's expected that Buckley is going to sign an extension soon.
 
Forgetting about the personalities involved, Bucks is doing a reasonable job of weeding out those who don't set the right standards/fall short of the professional ethic needed. He's cut a few club favourites which cause short term pain, but I'd have little doubt that the club will be better off in the long run.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Driving to work today they were saying the PAFC is outraged :D. Kochi will sort it out
 
Looks like Adelaide are facing the same criticism as we did in 2007 for wearing the WA SOO guernsey. They are wearing the SA one for the first showdown at Adelaide Oval.

Love it, wish we'd wear the WA SOO jumper against the Dorkers in a derby one time
 
Solution 1: Port wears the SA SOO guernsey, too. Home team wears navy shorts that typically accompanies SA SOO guernsey, while away team wears white shorts.

Solution 2: Port threatens to wear the Cows guernsey for the match in order to enrage the Cows into claiming it for their own and thus wearing it on the day instead of the SA SOO guernsey.
 
Solution 1: Port wears the SA SOO guernsey, too. Home team wears navy shorts that typically accompanies SA SOO guernsey, while away team wears white shorts.

Solution 2: Port threatens to wear the Cows guernsey for the match in order to enrage the Cows into claiming it for their own and thus wearing it on the day instead of the SA SOO guernsey.
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2014-02-06/red-light-for-crows-jumper
SANFL the gutless wonders rescinded their permission for crows to wear it. Pissweak.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I used to think of it as a bit of a blessing when other teams lose important players. But now i want us to win against sides playing at their best. Otherwise you're kidding yourself.
 
While the kids aren't bad I'd be quite concerned about the fact that you cannot possibly get any more output from Swan or Pendlebury.
If these guys slow down at all their midfield will quickly go from competitive to below average.
Their backline has some issues and will be exposed without a competitive midfield.

Beams is back in
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top