- Joined
- Oct 11, 2004
- Posts
- 31,294
- Reaction score
- 33,296
- Location
- Bali
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Fremantle
And Ross didn't mind the idea at all.The 6PR boys said to Ross that we're interested in Harley Bennell. Anyone know if this has any legs?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

WB v SYD · RIC v MEL · HAW v GCS · ESS v COL · PA v GEE · FRE v CAR · StK v WCE · BL v ADE · GWS v NM ·
Weekend Wrap and "Liked, Learned, Hated" right here -- How did tipping go?
And Ross didn't mind the idea at all.The 6PR boys said to Ross that we're interested in Harley Bennell. Anyone know if this has any legs?
Told you all you were targetting him heavily. Will be a Docker next year.
http://m.heraldsun.com.au/news/frem...ooter-jay-schulz/story-e6frf7jo-1227470078250
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I don't really mind that player managers use us for leverage. I think a lot of Sydney's woes at the moment are due to uneven distribution of the salary cap. I'll bet you Collingwood wish they weren't paying Cloke as much. In the long run it makes those clubs weaker.Along with Carlisle, Bennell, Black, Dixon, Jetta, Rinaldo, Federer.........
I mean, we probably are but the media and player agents know we have space to overpay someone so I would take anything with a grain of salt. He will come out and re-sign next week on a three year deal. Thanks Freo!
Nope. Wouldn't be a bad get, on the field at least.And Ross didn't mind the idea at all.
Maybe as a runner, delivering the coaches messages from the 'copter.You reckon Bondy should inquire about Bronwyn Bishop?
I want to see how old she looks without the Maybelline sponsorship.
Schulz is a very good forward and would be an important piece to keep us at the top end of the ladder whilst we build up Tabs, Apeness and A.Pearce.Schulz? Maybe 3 years ago.
Schulz is a very good forward and would be an important piece to keep us at the top end of the ladder whilst we build up Tabs, Apeness and A.Pearce.
In fact, I reckon if we signed him for 2 years Pavlich would play another season (if we don't win the GF this year).
Whilst it would be great to target early 20's forwards they cost too much and we are little to no chance of getting them hence why we have 3 on our list that we are developing. I believe the club feels that's the best way. IF Pav went around another year I've no doubt they would try and get him a veteran up forward, would make us significantly better. FFC have a habit of targeting one veteran player to fill a gap.Just feel we need to target the early 20's up and coming forward type to build a solid future with the club.
With that said if Pav did kick on for another year and we got Schulz - they'd both be on the wrong side of 30 but my God wouldn't they be a force together?
The 6PR boys said to Ross that we're interested in Harley Bennell. Anyone know if this has any legs?
Yeah my comment wasn't a knock on Dixon. Any tall forward of better than average quality would be more than welcome. Was just stating that if he doesn't do well with poor delivery into the forward 50, it probably wont magically change when we are pumping rubbish in at him either.
To be fair. We have some great entry into the forward 50 by players like Hill. Just not as regular as the fans would like.
You reckon Bondy should inquire about Bronwyn Bishop?
Perfect. He costs nothing and will be as good as anything else out there without giving up some serious quality mids off our list. It also weaken's Port who will surely be better next year and in the top eight.Get Shultz this year - allows another year of development from Tabs / Apeness... then get McCarthy when his contract expires end of next year
Schulz? Maybe 3 years ago.