Remove this Banner Ad

Analysis 2016 AFL Trade Week Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter raptalia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Port Adelaide's 2016 trade period, proudly brought to you by

s-l1000.jpg
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Do we have a first round pick next year? I do not see how finishing in the eight gets us one.
No we got pick 17 this year.

If we win the spoon then we've traded pick 1, 49 and 67 for 17, 30 and 31.

If we make the 8 then it's like 11, 49 and 67 for 17, 30 and 31 which looks ok to me.

Win the flag and it's 18, 48 and 67 for 17, 30 and 31 which won't happen but would look great.
 
To convince myself that we had made the right decisions over Trade Week I went through the last eight or so National Drafts and isolated picks 14,17,30,31.
I wish I hadn't. There are also more spuds among them than there are in Pauline Hanson's fish n' chip shop.

What an absurdly pointless exercise.
 
Dawes is a spud, but name a better available KPF who can also go into the ruck. Desperate times.

Unless we can get in the ear of the currently uncontracted Rhys Stanley about coming back to SA, and try to grab him in the PSD? Might be difficult with our exploding celery cap though.

I'd rather Jacko play forward and pinch hit in ruck than bring in Dawes to clog the list.
Surely there is a state league player who could be worth trying?
Anyone think of an available tall forward/ruckman that would be a better bet than Dawes?
 
Dawes being a KPF is kinda like Lobbe being a ruck.

Would prefer to go in shallow than bring in Dawes, unlike we are talking well under 200k.
 
To convince myself that we had made the right decisions over Trade Week I went through the last eight or so National Drafts and isolated picks 14,17,30,31.
I wish I hadn't. There are also more spuds among them than there are in Pauline Hanson's fish n' chip shop.

I did that too until I realised that any draft after 2010 is unrealistic as there were GCS and GWS concessions. They would have so many early picks they would select players for needs which often meant that mid forwards and ruckmen who would have gone late in the draft were taken early. And then there were academy picks who sometimes weren't bid on till late.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

What an absurdly pointless exercise.

Absurdly pointless, definitely.

But the criticism is way off too, there's plenty of good names in there.

2007: Jack Grimes, Harry Taylor, Jarrhan Jacky, John McCarthy (Vale)

2008: Ayce Cordy, Sam Blease, Dan Hannebury, Jordan Roughead

2009: Lewis Jetta, Daniel Menzel, Luke Ball*, Jason Tutt

2010: Brodie Smith, Shaun Atley, Jake Batchelor, Ariel Steinberg

2011: Devon Smith, Clay Smith, Elliot Yeo,
Jackson Merrett

*Mature age recruit
 
Absurdly pointless, definitely.

But the criticism is way off too, there's plenty of good names in there.

2007: Jack Grimes, Harry Taylor, Jarrhan Jacky, John McCarthy (Vale)

2008: Ayce Cordy, Sam Blease, Dan Hannebury, Jordan Roughead

2009: Lewis Jetta, Daniel Menzel, Luke Ball*, Jason Tutt

2010: Brodie Smith, Shaun Atley, Jake Batchelor, Ariel Steinberg

2011: Devon Smith, Clay Smith, Elliot Yeo,
Jackson Merrett

*Mature age recruit

Hah - I take some solace in the fact that raptalia clearly didn't actually do what he said he did.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

If we pick up Barrett and Dawes for free, we've done well and gone a long way to improving the structure of the list, with the chance to further right some wrongs in the draft.

The issue is I don't trust us to do this.

Barrett Sliding Dawes:rolleyes:
"First law of journalism: If I ignore the facts that prove your point, my opinions on the bad stuff are clearly accurate"
Dawes - seriously you couldn't make this shit up
Damian will take up that challenge:eek:
 
Something to offer still? He literally got traded today for a pity pick in the 90s because for some bizarre reason he was contracted for 2017 and couldn't be delisted.

Geelong clearly looking to strengthen their 3rds.

A club like Geelong has traded for him. Why act like your point has been proven? You are wrong. Live with it.
 
"The only thing we went in with was 9 and pick 49"

Just forgetting next years first rounder That you gave away Davies
That's fine, We'll just trade the first rounder in 2018 for a 2017 first rounder.

Repeat this forever.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom