2016 Non Crows AFL Discussion thread Part 2

[footy4ever]

Putting 2 and 2 together and getting 6, I'm assuming it's Hartlett?

I think we should assume it's nobody.

 

[matty p]

Putting aside whether Hartlett was involved or not, he was always going to be traded. They know they can't have both Boak and Hartlett at the club together and they're not gonna trade their captain so there's only one choice really. Hopefully Gold Coast don't take the bait though, Hartlett shouldn't be worth much in trade currency.

 

[hippyhippy]

The puffers think they will get pick 6 for hartlett ... HAHAHAHAHHAHA

 

[MRB37]

Putting aside whether Hartlett was involved or not, he was always going to be traded. They know they can't have both Boak and Hartlett at the club together and they're not gonna trade their captain so there's only one choice really. Hopefully Gold Coast don't take the bait though, Hartlett shouldn't be worth much in trade currency.

Port are assy enough to pull it off. If I were GC I'd tell them I'd give them back their second rounder and they can take it or leave it.

 

[matty p]

Port are assy enough to pull it off. If I were GC I'd tell them I'd give them back their second rounder and they can take it or leave it.

Yeah pick 6 for Hartlett would be utterly ludicrous. He's worth a 2nd rounder at best.

 

[hippyhippy]

Port are assy enough to pull it off. If I were GC I'd tell them I'd give them back their second rounder and they can take it or leave it.

It would be so funny on so many levels if the puffers get pick 6 for hartlett lol ... if i were them id think again about getting an injury prone player

 

[Elite Crow]

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport...d/news-story/f49ae3f2f4d40feb09662bd5e7566f99

Port would want to pull this trade off but I don't see that they have any hand at all. They've told a guy with 4 years to run they want to trade him. That means they want to get rid of him. If they can't come up with a trade they'll keep a player they have told they don't want.

If the rumours are true and there is a conflict, how bad will it be if he now stays?

I would go for Hartlett. I reckon he's the type of player that would want to shove it right up Port and what better way than doing it at their arch enemy.

 

[SloaneysDanger]

So Jarman's son is snuffing us for the Hawks? I would be disappointed if I was actually surprised, but I'm not.

 

[GROTTO]

The puffers think they will get pick 6 for hartlett ... HAHAHAHAHHAHA

We might as well package VB and 400kay and try our luck.

Throw in Thommo as player coach.

 

[hippyhippy]

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport...d/news-story/f49ae3f2f4d40feb09662bd5e7566f99

Port would want to pull this trade off but I don't see that they have any hand at all. They've told a guy with 4 years to run they want to trade him. That means they want to get rid of him. If they can't come up with a trade they'll keep a player they have told they don't want.

If the rumours are true and there is a conflict, how bad will it be if he now stays?

I would go for Hartlett. I reckon he's the type of player that would want to shove it right up Port and what better way than doing it at their arch enemy.

Yeah id take harlett .. but not for a first .. and also not before going all out on rocky.

 

[GROTTO]

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport...d/news-story/f49ae3f2f4d40feb09662bd5e7566f99

Port would want to pull this trade off but I don't see that they have any hand at all. They've told a guy with 4 years to run they want to trade him. That means they want to get rid of him. If they can't come up with a trade they'll keep a player they have told they don't want.

If the rumours are true and there is a conflict, how bad will it be if he now stays?

I would go for Hartlett. I reckon he's the type of player that would want to shove it right up Port and what better way than doing it at their arch enemy.

We also could get Hartlett very cheap too, they dont want him but they need to get rid of him, he holds all the cards to stay or go too.

Tbh our Club should be all over him and get him for unders.

 

[MRB37]

So Jarman's son is snuffing us for the Hawks? I would be disappointed if I was actually surprised, but I'm not.

Figured as much after what Andrew said.

 

[Samcro24]

Did the Port guys have a Mad Monday?

Yeah, after they lost to Melbourne

 

[baldandbroke]

So Jarman's son is snuffing us for the Hawks? I would be disappointed if I was actually surprised, but I'm not.

Where has this come from?

 

[hippyhippy]

So Jarman's son is snuffing us for the Hawks? I would be disappointed if I was actually surprised, but I'm not.

If true...We got no room anyways for small forwards ... we have a plethora of them now after not having anything for so long.

 

[footy4ever]

So Jarman's son is snuffing us for the Hawks? I would be disappointed if I was actually surprised, but I'm not.

do you have a source for this?

 

[SloaneysDanger]

Where has this come from?

Damo.

 

[SloaneysDanger]

do you have a source for this?

Look above.

 

[SloaneysDanger]

If true...We got no room anyways for small forwards ... we have a plethora of them now after not having anything for so long.

Not really. Eddie isn't going to be around forever and Charlie is hit and miss.

 

[hippyhippy]

Not really. Eddie isn't going to be around forever and Charlie is hit and miss.

Milera!!!

 

[footy4ever]

Damo.

Damo's wishful thinking.

 

[SloaneysDanger]

Milera!!!

Will need time to develop. Still a twig and looks like a running type of player than a small forward at this stage.

 

[Roo Lives Again]

If true...We got no room anyways for small forwards ... we have a plethora of them now after not having anything for so long.

He won't be ready for quite some time though. Hawks will be in rebuild mode by then so the little prat can go and get stuffed

 

[MRB37]

Where has this come from?

 

[Elite Crow]

Yeah id take harlett .. but not for a first .. and also not before going all out on rocky.

Both