I think dual-sided is the politically correct term for the kind of mid you are asking for above.Being inside he may just get a few more touches![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
I think dual-sided is the politically correct term for the kind of mid you are asking for above.Being inside he may just get a few more touches![]()
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Considered it and tbh the four that went before me were the next four on my list for the pick. I considered one or two others for the pick, but I think there’s value later on that can play a similar role so went for best available, the next highest on both Bishop and my boards.You just had to do it ............. didnt you
Big inside mid would have been nice P4L
With Brisbane taking McLennan do you see Witherdan moving to the wing and the Lions playing CoxPick 21(after matched bids) Brisbane Lions: Jez McLennan.
Tough choice. A couple of others I hoped to be still around are already gone.
Write up to come.
With Brisbane taking McLennan do you see Witherdan moving to the wing and the Lions playing Cox
I believe ohalloran will be one they really look at.Considered it and tbh the four that went before me were the next four on my list for the pick. I considered one or two others for the pick, but I think there’s value later on that can play a similar role so went for best available, the next highest on both Bishop and my boards.
Quite possibly and he did come into thinking. I just think injury has played a part in Hill’s decline this year but he’s still a super talent and was in most top 10s at the start of the year. He’s the type of player that could add to any side if he stays fit.I believe ohalloran will be one they really look at.
Hill is an outstanding talent and if it clicks for him he would be a massive steal here.
Very good pick.Pick 16 Fremantle - Sam Sturt (188cm, 78kg from Dandenong Stingrays/Vic Country)
Definitely not as left field as it would have been a couple of months back, but still around the top of his draft range I feel. I haven't seen as much of him as usual of the players I draft - but that's true for everyone involved here as he's only played 6 TAC Cup games. The sample size is small. But with the talk around him at the end of the season, he's one I went back and caught up on. And it's easy to see why he's considered one of the biggest draft bolters this year.
One thing I've always rated highly in draftees, particularly medium sized ones, is marking ability. If a skinny kid can take a one grab overhead mark, then it tends to translate well at the next level. Marking is something a player rarely learns to do. And Sturt looks a really good overhead mark to me. He's also got one of the best kicks in the draft, both over distance and hitting up forward 50 targets. Also killed the testing at the Combine - top 10 in the sprint and agility, and winning the running vertical.
Still has some way to go with his endurance, but most draftees do. Otherwise he's very much a potential pick, and his midfield game is largely unknown.
For Fremantle, I really wanted to add a fast and skilled medium forward at some stage. I feel it's the missing piece alongside Hogan and Lobb, while I would personally develop Cam McCarthy higher up the ground. So I did also consider Curtis Taylor, whereas Zac Butters and Ned McHenry didn't quite have the size I was after. Sam Sturt ticks nearly all the boxes, and I think could offer a similar output to Jaidyn Stephenson and Will Hayward.
Oh I agree, I don't expect him to be there in the actual draft, I think Freo pounce.Hill just has Fremantle written all over him
You've nailed this draft so far# 22 GIANTS
Zak Butter
Western Jets / 181cm / 70kg
Thrilled he lasted this long as considered taking him at #13.
Terrific talent who has some serious x factor about him. Only a little fella but at TAC level has made a name for himself as a ballwinner however he is going to struggle with that given his frame at AFL level. I think recruiters / coaches will see him more as an outside type who can play wing and forward. Watch him and you see he has really clean hands and makes really good and quick decisions. Has genuine speed and agility when exiting traffic and his touch by hand and foot is fantastic. Covers the ground well and runs both ways. Suspect he may start as a forward given his size but I would expect him to finish on a wing at some stage. He is going to need to get some weight on that body so the strength and conditioning people have some work to do but great to get him here. Word is he has interviewed really well.
# 22 GIANTS
Zak Butter
Western Jets / 181cm / 70kg
Thrilled he lasted this long as considered taking him at #13.
Terrific talent who has some serious x factor about him. Only a little fella but at TAC level has made a name for himself as a ballwinner however he is going to struggle with that given his frame at AFL level. I think recruiters / coaches will see him more as an outside type who can play wing and forward. Watch him and you see he has really clean hands and makes really good and quick decisions. Has genuine speed and agility when exiting traffic and his touch by hand and foot is fantastic. Covers the ground well and runs both ways. Suspect he may start as a forward given his size but I would expect him to finish on a wing at some stage. He is going to need to get some weight on that body so the strength and conditioning people have some work to do but great to get him here. Word is he has interviewed really well.
Is it true that non WA clubs are likely to steer clear of Hill and Stack?
While I agree with your concept of him being selected too high, it would be interesting to see what happened to your selections if you did match.Not inside my top 30. Can't justify it.
All yours.
Not inside my top 30. Can't justify it.
All yours.
Having said all that, was expecting you to pass as you have been consistent on your view on Quaynor and you stuck to it.
Knighta not a criticism but just curious as to your thinking.
Given you have a pick at 40 isn't the question do you rate Quaynor inside your top 40. I only ask because I look at it as a choice between Quaynor and now what you could reasonably get for pick 40.
I guess on the other side you might highly rate a player and be confident they drop but its a risk. You might also have to use that 40 on Kelly if you rate him / someone bids him so then the gulf between where you rated Quaynor and your first live pick becomes the real question.
Having said all that, was expecting you to pass as you have been consistent on your view on Quaynor and you stuck to it.
While I agree with your concept of him being selected too high, it would be interesting to see what happened to your selections if you did match.
I have a feeling that late in the draft, you still may get the player you wanted anyway but you would also have Q as well.