you don't think "cheat" is personal?
“Cheat” was the wrong choice of words, the correct word should have been “incompetent”.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
you don't think "cheat" is personal?
That 5 or 10 minutes will give us ump bashers time to calm the farm too ..good idea..would have made a difference for sure..........doesn't feel as good saying it when you're angry though - I'd like it if every time a contentious free kick was paid, the game was stopped for 5 or 10 minutes to let the players time out, calm down and focus better.........
Game of footy will go longer than a gridiron game.That 5 or 10 minutes will give us ump bashers time to calm the farm too ..good idea..
My post was sarcasm for Thy..Game of footy will go longer than a gridiron game.
Im wondering how many people here condoning thomas' words would say that if their child was the umpire? Happy for some nameless person to be abused but how would it feel if it was your child? Would you ever call your child a fn cheat?
I would, but then we don't really get along.or yourself regarding your work?
Not as personal as someone having a crack at my Mum, wife, child or anyone that matters to me. Not offended by the word cheat one iota.you don't think "cheat" is personal?
Not necessarily, I certainly didn't."Most people would love it if it was the other way around."
...most people would interpret this as applause
This is simply bewildering, it really is hard to see how Daisy is not completely correct in his assessment of the afl's representatives. How has Mumford not got banned? how? the act was clearly intentional, there was a clear strike, it was clearly late. The intent was there. Broken ribs medical report would indicate a level of impact? (i can only assume that the AFL gets their information from Bigfooty and have read several times that Murphy is soft a butter and assessed the impact as low?) resulting in a fine! did mumford even get a fine?
I am assuming that Brad Lloyd comments are naively trying to establish precedent when the blues come out angry next week and clobber a few saints. Do we get to play GWS again this year, i'm hoping we get them round 21 and casboult's 1 job for the day is to play 25 meters behind Mumford. everybody else's role is to kick it high on mumfords head.
mumford hasn't crossed the line here... it seems there is no line for mumford... possibly it got snorted during preseason?
Still cant believe that snorting prick got off. Media doesn't give a toss. Unbelievable
Agree it’s unbelievable the troll Mumford gets off without any reprimand and or fine minimum.
What’s more pathetic is our footy ops mngr , Llyod applauding and condoning the behavior as desirable. So Krooz should have rammed his knee into any GWS midfielders kidneys in a falling action eyes on the ball of course and squared the ledger?
not like he's calling him out on queue jumping or insurance fraud..........it's the bloke's job............I don't think it's appropriate for a player to call an umpire a ******* cheat.
sticks and stones (oh and knees)I don't think it's appropriate for a player to call an umpire a ******* cheat.
No, not sticks and stones. It's an accusation of cheating against an official of the game.sticks and stones (oh and knees)
Actually if we had anyone with any cahunas in the side I’d take it as full permission to be driving knees into every contest this week and beyond ...There is now a target on every blue player. The MRP has just given their full permission.