- Sep 19, 2019
- 11,751
- 16,165
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Other Teams
- Lakeshow
That's good then. In future, I'll tell you what you are telling me.no, that is not what I am telling you............
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
That's good then. In future, I'll tell you what you are telling me.no, that is not what I am telling you............
We will trade our 2 early selections for a earlier pick![]()
Report: AFL’s list and salary cuts revealed as trade deadline approaches
Report: AFL’s list and salary cuts revealed as trade deadline approacheswww.foxsports.com.au
Takes a bit of re-reading but clubs must have a minimum of 37 players and a maximum of 44. This includes Category B rookies.
There’s also a 10% salary reduction which is at the clubs’ discretion (so doesn’t have to be uniform across the playing group) and I think it was also said yesterday that clubs may take a minimum of just 1 player (or more if they choose) in the ND rather than the mandatory 3.
By my reckoning we currently have:
34 continuing senior list players
1 upgrade from the rookie list (Gibbons) (Pick 78 assuming we use 38 and 48)
3 players traded in (Zac W, Saad and Fogarty)
5 continuing rookies (Cottrell, Honey, Phillips, Owies and Moore)
so currently 43.
So do we go with just the 1 live selection in the ND?
Are we delisting 1 more player to take 2 live selections?
And do we have to move a player to the rookie list?
Rookie Butters plez.Could we take Butters as an SSP? Hes never played a game. Does that count?
It is warm over there. Needed to keep him on ice.Too soft?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
If we delist say Kennedy and/or Harry Macreadie with the aim to rookie list them, technically other clubs can draft them before our rookie picks.If we cut say a moore, we cant switch polson to rookie right? I mean, he will have to go through the rookie draft set up correct?
If the AFL's tardy decision making and notification causes clubs grief with the main list/rookie split, an amnesty should allow automatic rejigging of the allocations.If we delist say Kennedy and/or Harry Macreadie with the aim to rookie list them, technically other clubs can draft them before our rookie picks.
I'm sure I heard Wallace on SEN a while back say that if a club makes it's intentions known that they are going to re-rookie the player, there's a 'gentleman's agreement' that other clubs won't select them. I guess it's more about allowing clubs to manage their list rather than a rival club sniping.
Should be.Is that official?
It's obviously my shortlist of players, otherwise it'd be about 5 times longer.You suggesting one of these or just creating a list of delisted players?
If we delist say Kennedy and/or Harry Macreadie with the aim to rookie list them, technically other clubs can draft them before our rookie picks.
I'm sure I heard Wallace on SEN a while back say that if a club makes it's intentions known that they are going to re-rookie the player, there's a 'gentleman's agreement' that other clubs won't select them. I guess it's more about allowing clubs to manage their list rather than a rival club sniping.
Previously if they went through the ND and PSD undrafted, they'd be automatically rookies if the paperwork is done.
Same is true for Father-Son (cat A) and Academy (cat B) players.
RETIRED | DELISTED | FREE AGENCY | TRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Matthew Kreuzer | Hugh Goddard | | |
Kade Simpson | Darcy Lang | | |
| Finbar O'Dwyer | | |
| Ben Silvagni | | |
FREE AGENCY | TRADE |
|---|---|
Zac Williams | Adam Saad |
| Lachie Fogarty |
Love your work, W.CARLTON
PLAYERS OUT
PLAYERS IN
RETIRED DELISTED FREE AGENCY TRADE Matthew Kreuzer Hugh Goddard Kade Simpson Darcy Lang Finbar O'Dwyer Ben Silvagni
DRAFT PICKS
FREE AGENCY TRADE Zac Williams Adam Saad Lachie Fogarty
Pre trade period - 7, 27, 45, 81 - 2694
Post trade period - 38, 48, 78 - 767
Points differential - Minus 1927 points
Effectively, we paid the value of pick 5 and Simmo (the only out who had an impact this year) for Zac Williams, Adam Saad, and Lachie FogartyPLAYERCARDSTART42Adam Saad
- Age
- 31
- Ht
- 178cm
- Wt
- 79kg
- Pos.
- Def
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 17.5
- 4star
- K
- 10.0
- 4star
- HB
- 7.5
- 5star
- M
- 3.0
- 3star
- T
- 2.7
- 4star
- MG
- 349.1
- 5star
- D
- 20.7
- 5star
- K
- 12.0
- 5star
- HB
- 8.7
- 4star
- M
- 3.3
- 3star
- T
- 2.4
- 3star
- MG
- 388.3
- 5star
- D
- 17.6
- 5star
- K
- 10.4
- 4star
- HB
- 7.2
- 5star
- M
- 4.2
- 4star
- T
- 1.2
- 3star
PLAYERCARDEND
I can live with that especially if the rumored one player draft rule eventuates. If it does its likely there will be teams passing before our first pick.
Love your work, W.
It's obviously my shortlist of players, otherwise it'd be about 5 times longer.
Half of them won't be interested in playing for a Victorian team, or need to go through a medical, or just haven't wound up finding the right mindset for professional sport, but there's a lot of raw talent there.
Fully accept that professional recruitment staff have a better grasp of where each player is at mentally and professionally, as they should, because it's literally their job.
why didn't we take tom phillipsfrom scumwood in trade period good pick up for hawks and cheapPLAYERCARDSTART21Tom Phillips
- Age
- 29
- Ht
- 187cm
- Wt
- 80kg
- Pos.
- Mid
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 22.4
- 5star
- K
- 13.4
- 5star
- HB
- 9.0
- 5star
- M
- 5.1
- 5star
- T
- 2.5
- 4star
- CL
- 1.6
- 4star
- D
- 15.1
- 4star
- K
- 8.5
- 3star
- HB
- 6.6
- 4star
- M
- 2.5
- 3star
- T
- 2.3
- 3star
- CL
- 0.5
- 3star
- D
- 16.0
- 4star
- K
- 9.0
- 4star
- HB
- 7.0
- 5star
- M
- 5.2
- 5star
- T
- 3.0
- 5star
- CL
- 0.8
- 3star
PLAYERCARDEND
Not cheap at all, if 500K was the price to take him off Collingwood's hands, regardless of the player.....who happens to be not such a good player and then someone we don't even need. The cost would then be all the heavier should we not have the money for Cripps & McKay, thereafter.
Carlton had a very good trading period and there's absolutely no need to double on types you already have on the list......because somehow they happen to be good players. Glad we didn't get sucked into taking on the likes of Brodie, Blakely, Witherden, Narkle, Constable etc. It's just a waste of resources.
What’s the negative on Butters (why didn’t Freo persevere?).
Witherden is an absolute steal, will play a fair bit of high quality footy at WC
Lions erred here
Crazy that they're paying a good chunk of his salary, also.
Something's not right about that deal whether I rate Witherden or not.
Huge gap between Saad and Witherden though; One took a top ten pick to ge the deal done, the other was just about given away.
very mixed bag of opinions re phillips on the pies board this season - one extreme muppit suggested the only good thing about losing their final was never seeing him in the b & w again - go figure............
That is what most of game is about, people in the now, rather than seeing the possibilities
Admittedly, Witherden is of similar pace to the majority of our general defenders, hence Saad types being a slightly better fit, but none have Witherden's footskills
If we knew what was truly unfolding at the Pies, I would have enquired about Noble
I wouldnt look at any of those players....Adelaide: Crocker, Gallucci
Collingwood: Scharenberg
Fremantle: Isaiah Butters
Kangaroos: Ahern, Murphy, Pittard
Port: Atley, Frederick
Richmond: Turner
St Kilda: Parker
West Coast: Watson
I'm expecting some more interesting delistings in the next few days as list sizes are confirmed.
I wouldnt look at any of those players....
Who do we think will be our next tagger? Do we need to go and target someone in a trade next year, or do we already have them on our list? Stocker, JSOS, Martin, or someone else?
skinny runtCottrell?