Deaneus!
We Await Silent Tristero's Empire
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2007
- Posts
- 25,849
- Reaction score
- 54,742
- Location
- DTC Frat House
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Team Lambda Variant
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

LIVE: Geelong v Gold Coast - Rd 14 - 7:40PM Fri
Squiggle tips Cats at 78% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists » -- All Rd 14 Games
Keays unlikely. Butts and/or Strachan, as both have been on the rookie list for 3 years (to Keays' 2 years).
Richmond have to many picks not to trade up and seems like they let 17 go so can only assume they going for something bigger.
Richmond get pick 2, 33
GWS pick 4 plus points for Fahey from Richmond
We take pick 7, 26, 28
Would like 15 but don't think it happens
We take 3 picks inside 30 which we have done in 2018, 2019, 2020 (4 picks)
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Rookies can be & are frequently signed to multi-year deals - Keays himself signed for 2 years in October 2020. It's only newly drafted rookies who are given 12 month contracts by default, after that clubs can sign them to multi-year contracts, exactly the same as they do with players on the senior list.I wonder about this. Keays had a fantastic year. Choosing to retain him on the rookie list just because we can seems like a slap in the face. It's not like he is signed to a three year deal and he's two years into it, the rookie deals are 12 month contracts, right?
Surely Keays would rightly be pissed off if he told him, hey, nice year mate, but we're going to keep you on the rookie list another year because we can.
If it came down to list places, I imagine we would move ROC on (either delisted, or perhaps move him to the rookie list) to make room for Keays.
West AdelaideProbably not for us, but I agree with WW that Andrew could be a star. A lot to work with.

Yes Talia, Lynch, ROC, Kelly,Richmond have to many picks not to trade up and seems like they let 17 go so can only assume they going for something bigger.
Richmond get pick 2, 33
GWS pick 4 plus points for Fahey from Richmond
We take pick 7, 26, 28
Would like 15 but don't think it happens
We take 3 picks inside 30 which we have done in 2018, 2019, 2020 (4 picks)
I do think that’s the idea though , from what I’m hearing clubs A) think this years draft is a lottery with 2 yrs no football for many kids and B) it’s not all that strong anywayYep good points
Although it does leave us pretty much pick-less beyond pick 4. We'd really want to hope we hit with our 1st this year
He wouldn’t have been a target as we’d rather play Pedlar Shoenberg Berry and hopefully this years first pick and rightly soWould have loved to have been the club involved in that Will Brodie salary dump. Not that I think that Will is much of a player, but another in the Keays mould where a new situation might help. Only contracted for 2022 so if he is no good, you take pick 19 (potentially pair with filler for Dawson) and run.
Perhaps he wouldn't have come to SA but I'm of the view we need to continue to build out the 22-26yo portion of our list. Kudos to Freo.
Agree - I think this is the exactly what it will be and if they don’t accept it’s pre season draft time ( which is no guarantee of landing him )As much as some people won’t like to see it, the new offer to Sydney will likely be:
Dees 2022 first
Our 2022 second
for
Dawson
Pick 39 OR Swans 2022 2nd (depends on whether we have a list spot to use on 39 this year or whether we prefer to upgrade a rookie).
Bookmark it.
Swans would be mad not to accept, but who knows with these clowns. Fingers crossed for PSD here. Most neutrals agree that we’ve been very fair in our offers to this point.
Pretty sure you have to use 3 picks in the main draft min so I think receiving a pick from sydney is likely or splitting 4 into 2 picks ( this would only happen after a Dawson deal is done )We are doing one of the following:
1) Only using 4 and 33 in the draft, and filling the remaining list spots with O’Connor, Dawson and a rookie upgrade (Butts)
2) Receiving 39 back from Sydney in a Dawson trade involving Melbourne’s 2022 first rounder (with another of our future picks also going their way). Here, we would take 4, 33 and 39 to the draft, meaning that either Butts remains on the rookie list, or we delist O’Connor (O’Connor likely to be taken in the rookie draft)
3) Splitting pick 4 for 7 and 15 in a trade with Richmond, and taking 7, 15 and 33 to the draft. Again, this would mean Butts remains on the rookie list or O’Connor is delisted.
Rookie upgrades count towards the 3 mandatory list changesPretty sure you have to use 3 picks in the main draft min so I think receiving a pick from sydney is likely or splitting 4 into 2 picks ( this would only happen after a Dawson deal is done )
Kai Lohmann or Kai LohmannIF our picks remain as is, who would you like to see us target at 33 Mutineer DaKids Jeffcrowe Skippos WaynesWorld19 ?

Haha tongue in cheek mate, no worriesSorry, I can only tag 5 in a post Danger in Texas ...

Depends who's left, Murley has seemingly flown under the radar due to injury, he might appeal for positional need and SA factor (I know thats not a massive thing for this board though). Similarly Motlop could be available as a small forward. Roberts might slide into that range as wellIF our picks remain as is, who would you like to see us target at 33 Danger in Texas PMBangers ?
Not an overly positive view there Bicks.I just hope Jordan Dawson is worth the gymnastics Reidy's having to endure to land him and just half as good as some on this board seem to think he'll be for Adelaide.
Also Lachie Rankin is one that doesnt get a lot of mention but would be good value in the 30's imoDepends who's left, Murley has seemingly flown under the radar due to injury, he might appeal for positional need and SA factor (I know thats not a massive thing for this board though). Similarly Motlop could be available as a small forward. Roberts might slide into that range as well
