2021 Non-Crows AFL Discussion Part 1: we can have lots of fun!

[FR0GGY]

Absolutely not.

So which other players should he have used as an example instead of Tex?

 

[hey shorty]

So which other players should he have used as an example instead of Tex?

Ian Chappell......

 

[FR0GGY]

Nope.
Kornes is a campaigner....you can read him like a book, no need to analyse any of the crap that falls out of his mouth in regard to Tex

This is the same thinking as kirky responding on the poster rather than the content.

 

[CrowsB4hoes]

He also quoted richo.
Also Tex wasn’t criticizing Paine, he was supporting him.
Which other high profile sportsmen went in to bat for Paine that he could have mentioned as well?
Of course it’s more than that, he actually had a decent point unless you reckon Paine should be beyond criticism?

Why mention anyone? What’s the point he’s making? Is it about Paine or Tex?

 

[CrowsB4hoes]

Ian Chappell......

Referring to a former Australian captains comments about the current Australian captain, instead of Tex?

You mad?

 

[hey shorty]

Why mention anyone? What’s the point he’s making? Is it about Paine or Tex?

That's it.

"All those sticking up for Tim Paine.... What are they thinking"

Done.

 

[hey shorty]

SEN are struggling in Adelaide, he needs to mention the camp next.

 

[FR0GGY]

Ian Chappell......

Doesn’t look like he’s tweeted for 2 years?

 

[FR0GGY]

Why mention anyone? What’s the point he’s making? Is it about Paine or Tex?

Because people want examples in life.
It’s about Paine not being immune to criticism and used an example.
It’s not really hard to follow his point I wouldn’t have thought.

 

[hey shorty]

Doesn’t look like he’s tweeted for 2 years?

He's still sticking up for Paine.

 

[jackster83]

SEN are struggling in Adelaide, he needs to mention the camp next.

It's as inevitable as a dog eating its own vomit.

 

[FR0GGY]

He's still sticking up for Paine.

Well I have no idea if Kornes is across his opinion, but it covers him as well.
Just because hes mentioned 2 people doesn’t mean that’s the only ones he’s having a go at.

 

[Mutineer]

Why mention anyone? What’s the point he’s making? Is it about Paine or Tex?

^^^^^

What he said FR0GGY

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

Doesn’t look like he’s tweeted for 2 years?

Chappelli mentioned he isn't the best with technology...

 

[FR0GGY]

He's still sticking up for Paine.

Also that is not Kane’s point, his point is people (Tex) having a go at others for having a crack at Paine.
If Tex just had an opinion on Paine it would be different but his tweet was on those questioning Paine.
So Can you show me these other examples he could have used instead of Tex?

 

[FR0GGY]

^^^^^

What he said FR0GGY

As I said his point is about people (Tex) having a go at people expressing an opinion on Paine.
I’m yet to be shown any other sportsperson he could have used instead.

 

[hey shorty]

As I said his point is about people (Tex) having a go at people expressing an opinion on Paine.
I’m yet to be shown any other sportsperson he could have used instead.

I gave you a person

 

[FR0GGY]

I gave you a person

You’re not understanding the topic then.
Tex didn’t just support Paine he was having a go at “Bogan aussies” that dared to question Paine.
That’s completely different to just supporting Paine.
Kornes is saying people are well entitled to question high profile sports people. (As we all seem to agree with)

 

[CrowsB4hoes]

Also that is not Kane’s point, his point is people (Tex) having a go at others for having a crack at Paine.
If Tex just had an opinion on Paine it would be different but his tweet was on those questioning Paine.
So Can you show me these other examples he could have used instead of Tex?

I’ve had too many beers for this inception level bullshit

 

[CrowsB4hoes]

Also that is not Kane’s point, his point is people (Tex) having a go at others for having a crack at Paine.
If Tex just had an opinion on Paine it would be different but his tweet was on those questioning Paine.
So Can you show me these other examples he could have used instead of Tex?

If there’s no other example, only Tex, then he’s making a point of “people” having a go at Paine based on one lone person (who happens to be Tex)

 

[Mr_Moogle]

You’re not understanding the topic then.
Tex didn’t just support Paine he was having a go at “Bogan aussies” that dared to question Paine.
That’s completely different to just supporting Paine.
Kornes is saying people are well entitled to question high profile sports people. (As we all seem to agree with)

I don't disagree with Cornes here but I also know he has nothing but contempt for the AFC. We can safely assume the he will take the opportunity to get his digs in wherever possible. He can be right and still be an opportunistic little bitch at the same time.

 

[FR0GGY]

If there’s no other example, only Tex, then he’s making a point of “people” having a go at Paine based on one lone person (who happens to be Tex)

He’s not having a go at people having a go at pain. He’s agreeing that people should be able to have an opinion.
Both you and shorty have tied yourselves up and not understanding their positions.

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

I’ve had too many beers for this inception level bullshit

I just choose not give a rat's tossbag about anything Kornes...

 

[hey shorty]

He’s not having a go at people having a go at pain. He’s agreeing that people should be able to have an opinion.
Both you and shorty have tied yourselves up and not understanding their positions.

No, I totally understand.

Kane needs listeners, so he mentioned Tex. I mean c'mon it's not as if he doesn't have history.

 

[FR0GGY]

No, I totally understand.

Kane needs listeners, so he mentioned Tex. I mean c'mon it's not as if he doesn't have history.

You’re not showing it with your posts though, hence using chapelli as an example.