giantroo
Bleeding Blue and White
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

AFLW Logo
The livestream will be available on womens.afl & the AFLW app. Join our live chat!
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
It likes some bizarre attempt that advocates North accommodate Richmond's points and draft needs.
As we are doing them a favour trading Tarrant they will accept a late 20s/38 pick turn it up..It likes some bizarre attempt for North to accommodate Richmond's points and draft needs.
Save this comment on copy-paste, it won't be long before it is just as accurate again (and again!)
No surprise, Ralphy again.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Not really man. I'm just aware that a list needs depth and can't be full of superstars and youth.
Dumont would be a solid piece in any afl squad despite being a bit slow. He seems to have a good head on his shoulders, knows his role, and might actually be able to flourish a bit more under a second year of Noble.
Look at what happened to someone like Hall over the course of a year. It just takes a role change or tinkering in position to recognise the strengths of a player.
In a way, I am happy we don't have any media sycophants. Ralph and Caro have come across as completely spiteful and slimy.No surprise, Ralphy again.
As the days go on, my desire to totally fu** Richmond over in a trade grow stronger. I am now of the opinion that they should give us draft picks to take CCJ. We then take Taz in the PSD. fu** you Ninthmond!
It is technically possible.Taz is a free agent so can walk to whoever he likes.... he won't be going to the psd!
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
I’m genuinely concerned for the future of our country that that article was labeled a “16 minute read”. Reckon it took about 1.5.
I’d reckon there’d have to be far more “concerning” errors happening on a daily basis.1.5 for you Victorians, a 16 minute read for us lesser Syrians in qld.I’m genuinely concerned for the future of our country that that article was labeled a “16 minute read”. Reckon it took about 1.5.
If there was ever a thread that needs a bump.1.5 for you Victorians, 16 read for us lesser Syrians in qld.
Did we trade for Young in good faith as we wanted to trade for their 1st and they were going to trade it to us until they traded for Treloar?I think they just have to offer him a contract to remove that loophole. It's why we had to trade for Young, the Dogs just had to present they made him an offer. Saying that, it might be contradicted by the fourth year rookie rule exclusive to this season.
The rule has never been used.Did we trade for Young in good faith as we wanted to trade for their 1st and they were going to trade it to us until they traded for Treloar?
We haven't even declared we are going to play hardball yetSo we started with Dimma joking he wanted pick 1
Then they were playing hardball demanding pick 20
Now its something between 20-38.
This is getting better the longer we wait.
that's it in a nutshell; we do them a favour re: Taz, and as a reward, we get to do them another favour. I'd love to be buying a house off Ralph, I reckon I could convince him to pay me to take it off his handsAs we are doing them a favour trading Tarrant they will accept a late 20s/38 pick turn it up..
On SM-G950F using BigFooty.com mobile app
So we started with Dimma joking he wanted pick 1
Then they were playing hardball demanding pick 20
Now its something between 20-38.
This is getting better the longer we wait.
The article reads to me like north are offering 38.We will likely pay less than 38, they want a Tarrant trade and we can walk him. Taz snd 76 or nothing
You and the rest of the supporter base, I suspect. If there are no takers, it will be one or the other, not bothI'd be concerned if we have offered a 1 year deal to Atley before Dumont
Riley Beveridge reckons Atley will be at North (possibly a one year deal)
From 6min in
This exactly. We shouldnt even entertain giving any picks at all maybe 69 at most, we only have 3 good picks to begin with granted we might get lucky and get something for dumont but we have all the power here.It'll end up being Taz for CCJ. We really have all the hand here. Their Chol compo becomes our pick to trade to them essentially given if we refuse to trade Taz (ie let him walk via FA) they lose any value in the Chol FA compo pick. Plus we have the PSD to fall back on if they want anything more than a straight swap.
fu** em. No favours.
So essentially, Taz and Chol compo for CCJ, or Taz for CCJ. You choose Tiggers.