Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
It appears that most negative posters are condemning our recruiters off the Jones / Ned selectionsFirst round picks we don’t seem to pick anything other than competitiveness. I for the life of me can’t see how Ned got on an AFL list - I appreciate he was tipped to go around 20 - but has no one wood. Not real quick, a below average kick, small, no evasive skills
Jones similar although I can see at least why you would pick him.
The Ned McHenry you describe there is not the Ned McHenry I saw play live up close at least a half a dozen times in 2017 & 2018.That just isn’t correct. The “successes” you have highlighted are by no means locked into good long AFL careers. They have shown some signs - I doubt Murray gets a game at anyone bar North and Gollant maybe 2-3 clubs. I would suggest it is easier to get those successes at the later picks - as you are generally selecting an attribute you think could develop (athleticism (Gollant), speed (Newchurch), size(Murray), great kicking skills (Parnell)
First round picks we don’t seem to pick anything other than competitiveness. I for the life of me can’t see how Ned got on an AFL list - I appreciate he was tipped to go around 20 - but has no one wood. Not real quick, a below average kick, small, no evasive skills
Jones similar although I can see at least why you would pick him.
McAsey - for a top 10 pick doesn’t seem to have a one wood either. Just compare to Chapman and Gibcus - even DGB over the last few years
Massive misses that will extend our rebuild by a couple of years
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Even still, you have to be absolutely elite to get midfield games as a sub 180cm player.The Ned McHenry you describe there is not the Ned McHenry I saw play live up close at least a half a dozen times in 2017 & 2018.
Why he has not been given exposure to the midfield is mistifying given when playing 2nd banana to Sam Walsh for the Falcons he was very solid in there. He may not be the quickest player out there but no way is he lacking in evasiveness and his kicking is not below average either.
![]()
Edward McHenry Draft Profile
DRAFT ANALYSIS: "A tenacious small midfielder/forward who has great evasion skills."central.rookieme.com
Advertise with us
#8
Edward McHenry
Height: 176cm
Weight: 71kg
D.O.B: 13-07-2000
DRAFT ANALYSIS: "A tenacious small midfielder/forward who has great evasion skills."
Leagues: Under 18s Championships, NAB League Boys
OVERVIEW
Edward "Ned" McHenry is a player who has not let size get in the way of his AFL dream. There are not too many mid-170cm players who are talked about as first-round prospects, but that is how impressive McHenry has been over the journey. While his size might put some clubs off, like any smaller player coming into AFL draft consideration, McHenry has plenty of impressive traits that catch the eye, and he is certainly going to be a handy pick-up for whichever club decides to draft him. He is smart with the ball in hand, can evade opponents and run all day long with an elite tank, while he can play inside or outside - though he does not mark as much as other midfielders - and he is a profound tackler who loves the defensive side of football as much as the offensive side of football. He will likely fulfil that small forward role at AFL level, providing plenty of defensive pressure, or he could pinch hit on the outside being the player to use the ball going inside 50, however he does have limited speed. Either way, we expect he lands somewhere in the second round.
STRENGTHS
McHenry is a player who you would love as your teammate, but hate as your opponent. He has that fiery passion to bleed for the jumper and defend his teammates at all costs. At times it can result in free kicks going the other way, but if there is one player in the draft crop that you can guarantee will fly the flag for a teammate copping attention, that is certainly McHenry. He is not afraid to let an opponent know if they have made a mistake, but he walks the walk as well as talks the talk, running both ways impressively. His massive endurance base - a draft-crop leading 22.2 on the yo-yo test and an impressive 6:11 on the 2km time trial at the National Draft Combine, means he is in the elite echelon of gut-runners and this is the main thing that sets him aside from a lot of the other draftees.
- Evasion
- Tackling
- Decision making
- Clearances
- Endurance
- Team-first approach
On-field, his evasion, decision making and clearance work helps him have a few tricks he can display, and he has the ability to win the ball at the coal face, then dart out of a stoppage, not through acceleration, but through evasion. With ball-in-hand, McHenry makes good decisions, especially going inside 50, often pulling kicks or putting them in front of his teammates to their advantage. He finished the TAC Cup season with 66.3 per cent by foot and a 12 per cent clanger kick percentage rate, which is solid considering his role. He averaged 4.9 clearances, though that was ultimately diluted by moving around the ground and not being a pure inside midfielder the entire year, same with his tackling. McHenry recorded 5.3 tackles per game in the TAC Cup season playing between midfield and forward, then once he got his chance predominantly forward at the National Under 18 Championships, McHenry doubled that average to easily be the leading tackler from the competition. This is just one area of his team-first approach that he takes to his football and one of the reasons why teammates love to have him on their side and why he will no doubt be a player that future teammates enjoy being around.
IMPROVEMENTS
In terms of improvements, there is not a great deal that McHenry does not at least do to an adequate level. He could be more consistent week-to-week, which is something that plagues almost all Under 18s players at some stage. It can depend on his role - whether he is inside, outside or forward, but generally he has some unbelievable games, and then some quiet ones. Case in point was against Calder Cannons in the Wildcard Round, he was a clear best on ground with 20 disposals, six tackles and two goals, more importantly standing up while co-captain Sam Walsh was copping plenty of attention from the opposition that day. The next week in Geelong's elimination final loss to Gippsland Power, he still had 18 disposals and three marks, but his impact on the contest was limited, not hitting the scoreboard and generally being a lot quieter. Secondly, McHenry is not the quickest player out there, which can often be overshadowed by his evasion and endurance, but in terms of acceleration or general speed, McHenry does have an area to build on. It is one of those things that will not be an issue for him with a forward role, but might be the question mark on an outside midfield role.
- Consistency
- Speed
DRAFT PROJECTION: 15-40
SUMMARY
Ned McHenry is a great player who clubs should not overlook just because of his size. Like any Under 18s player, McHenry has his great games and his quieter games, and he is not the quickest player going around. However, he is the draft crop gut-runner who is a tackling machine with good evasion techniques and decision making, as well as an ability to win clearances and play through the midfield or up forward. He is one of those players that will have a high standard he sets himself, and once he slots into a club at the elite level, expect him to get the absolute most out of himself.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Very similarly built to Zak Butters who seems to handle it OK in there and I'd guarantee if he broke from a centre clearance he'd spot up a leading forward better than any of our current rotation.Even still, you have to be absolutely elite to get midfield games as a sub 180cm player.
He doesn't have the qualities of, say, Lachie Neale
I am with you throw him in the middle!!!Very similarly built to Zak Butters who seems to handle it OK in there and I'd guarantee if he broke from a centre clearance he'd spot up a leading forward better than any of our current rotation.
Middle of the bench. Ned is trending to not making it.The middle of what?
Lever, McGovern, Cameron. Good times.Remember when we used to be worried about other clubs poaching our young stars?
I’m not that down on Ned, but Butters has him well covered for class, composure and consistency of accumulationVery similarly built to Zak Butters who seems to handle it OK in there and I'd guarantee if he broke from a centre clearance he'd spot up a leading forward better than any of our current rotation.
Comparing Butters to McHenry is ridiculous.I’m not that down on Ned, but Butters has him well covered for class, composure and consistency of accumulation
Most small midfielders have either elite disposal, or are elite ball winners. Or both. Ned has neither and his core strength is far too weak to be a ground ball playerI’m not that down on Ned, but Butters has him well covered for class, composure and consistency of accumulation
Just look at the way Neale is built. He's very chunky. Look at how well his core and legs are built. That combined with a low centre of gravity. It would be hard to tackle a bloke like that effectively.Even still, you have to be absolutely elite to get midfield games as a sub 180cm player.
He doesn't have the qualities of, say, Lachie Neale
Wouldn't have anything to do with the roles set by the relevant coaching panels?I’m not that down on Ned, but Butters has him well covered for class, composure and consistency of accumulation
Even without the Butters comparison, Ned probably needs to show more A1 traits if he's going to stand out in the middle as a smaller guyWouldn't have anything to do with the roles set by the relevant coaching panels?
Nowhere did I compare them other than size/build for midfield btw.
You looked at WCE’s list profile? Most of their best players are breaking down and/or over 30, and I can’t see those that aren’t (Kelly, Yeo, Barrass, Sheed) as the types to carry them on their back up the ladder. Their young talent’s a bit like ours too, a lot of unknowns and unprovens.
The thing they have going for them is they have a proven good coach
You've missed the point entirely ....suggest you study other club's Draft Histories & you'll find we stack up very well
Given our list profile, if we can’t afford to pay out some lesser contracts then Reid has *ed it up
Why is our midfield the worst in the comp if our drafting has been so good?You've missed the point entirely ....suggest you study other club's Draft Histories & you'll find we stack up very well
1st Round picks are a lot easier to select .....2nd round onwards more difficult ....and that's the true measure of your recruiting
You also have to look at the Draft quality .....the CoVid Drafts have been very difficult, due to so few games being played .....that's not to say we haven't drafted well, TWT on that
Re MELB ....you realise Gawn was Drafted 13 years ago, in the midst of them tanking & being a complete ****show .....Viney was a father/son
I will say though, MELB were a lot more aggressive with their trading in of May & Lever .....this is the area i'm critical of
Drafting IMO we stack up well .....Trading we're too timid ....sometimes you have to identify the player you want, and get the deal done .....particularly if that player type is not available in the Draft
Oh could we do with an Oliver / Petracca .....they just haven't been within coeee of us ....but great we had a red hot go at JHF at #1
Because for whatever reason, our current midfield mix is TERRIBLE .....too many of the same type, slow and handball happy .....Crouch throws the balance right outWhy is our midfield the worst in the comp if our drafting has been so good?
How long has Hamish been our recruiter? You’re talking mostly newbies to be our next midfield. Jones and McHenry were drafted as mids and have been flops.Because for whatever reason, our current midfield mix is TERRIBLE .....too many of the same type, slow and handball happy .....Crouch throws the balance right out
Hately is NOT a Wingman
Soligo will be a great mid .....Pedlar also ....also can see Cook / Milera as a Mid
Milera has been proven to not be an AFL FWD ....despite where he played at Centrals ....it limits his skillsets
That's just not correct...Chayce Jones was very well thought of as a likely 1st round draft pick. All Australian at the Nationals, runnner up in the Tasmanian State League off of only 7 games against the men as an 18 year old.Let's be honest.
No one on draft night 2018 saw Jones and McHenry as potential elite mids and were excited we drafted them.
180cm ish "mids" who peaked as mids at 17 years of age.
Both of their draft bios read as workman who did ok as kids in the middle through grinding away at it. No standout attributes.
On SM-A325F using BigFooty.com mobile app
So from 2012 to 2019, which first round draftee should have been an elite mid now?Because for whatever reason, our current midfield mix is TERRIBLE .....too many of the same type, slow and handball happy .....Crouch throws the balance right out
Hately is NOT a Wingman
Soligo will be a great mid .....Pedlar also ....also can see Cook / Milera as a Mid
Milera has been proven to not be an AFL FWD ....despite where he played at Centrals ....it limits his skillsets