Not brilliant. Was it widely publicised?
Is it available to watch/ a replay? We love winning/Sam.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not brilliant. Was it widely publicised?
A marketing strategy for Kayo.
Astute business decisionSomeone may have reminded them that things like this is why they get 30m from the feds
Up against Tennis and IACGMOOH I would think 110k was respectable at least.
What a disgrace it would lke like an Australian Football team winning by 100 goals!Not brilliant. Was it widely publicised?
Is it available to watch/ a replay? We love winning/Sam.
Don't forget Soccer in Australia is run out of Sydney!Yeah, it's probably OK. But take Sydney out and it was pretty ordinary - 42% of all viewers and 46% of 18-49s were from Sydney.
I note they've just announced the Socceroos WCQ against Japan will be in - you guessed it - Sydney as well. They have to be careful that they're not pissing off every other city and causing disinterest in the rest of the country.
Don't forget Soccer in Australia is run out of Sydney!
We need to let the poor NSW dahlings have some sort in international sport even it is second rate soccer!
Yeah, it's probably OK. But take Sydney out and it was pretty ordinary - 42% of all viewers and 46% of 18-49s were from Sydney.
I note they've just announced the Socceroos WCQ against Japan will be in - you guessed it - Sydney as well. They have to be careful that they're not pissing off every other city and causing disinterest in the rest of the country.
What a disgrace it would lke like an Australian Football team winning by 100 goals!
Poor A-league only got 44k. To be expected in a when nine get an audience share greater than the AFL Grand final. 68% overall.
7 did the classic buy high/sell low with the BBL. Now they might do the same with the tennis.
Should be in gaolBBL went for content & I for one no longer watch regularly.
7 won the tennis with the 'help' of an expert:
Tennis Australia board stopped from seeing better offers for Australian Open broadcast rights, court hears
A court hears Harold Mitchell was "pushing" for Tennis Australia to sign a contract for the broadcast rights of the Australian Open with Channel 7 when he was the sports body's director in 2013.www.abc.net.auHarold Mitchell fined $90,000 for 'serious' breaches at Tennis Australia
Harold Mitchell has been hit with a $90,000 fine for committing "serious" breaches of director's duties while he was on the board of Tennis Australia.www.abc.net.au
'Harold Mitchell has been hit with a $90,000 fine for committing "serious" breaches of director's duties while on the board of Tennis Australia.
Mr Mitchell acted inappropriately by feeding secret information about Tennis Australia to the Seven Network, which helped it win the rights over other bidders, Justice Jonathan Beach ruled.
The broadcast rights were awarded to Seven for five years in 2013, but there was never a competitive tender process.
Channel Nine finally won the rights to broadcast the Australian Open from 2020 in a new five-year, $300 million deal sealed with Tennis Australia in 2018, ending a 35-year partnership with Channel Seven.
The Court decided not to ban Mr Mitchell from managing corporations, nor did it impose the maximum penalty of $600,000 for three breaches of director's duties.
However, Mr Mitchell is up for millions of dollars in legal fees, as both sides were ordered to bear their costs.'