Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2022 Trade Thread - Part II

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Four picks inside 30, one at 44 in the ND. I wasn’t counting rookies. Much better hand then we are holding atm. Get them wrong and there are a lot of players not even up to VFL level. We have 2 or 3 on the list from the last couple of years that aren’t VFL standard already.

Our development is bad enough without Sandy getting spanked every week.

You're probably right, but aren't Sandy already going pretty poorly?
 
Because he’s a complete idiot off the field. Don’t get me wrong he’s a better play than Clark, but if it said that we are looking to move him on because of offield issues, then it wouldn’t make sense to target de goey.

Sounds like the Clark thing might be about lack of work ethic or professionalism. Not sure those are De Goey's problems necessarily, my understanding is that he does the work, just likes to also blow off steam in public ways.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Hunter Clark (St Kilda)
“We saw the concessions that were given North Melbourne yesterday.
“Incidentally, that future second-rounder, I expect them to use that on Hunter Clark.
“I think that’s likely at the moment as we sit here right now.
“I think that future second-rounder that they’ve been given – a 2023 second-round pick – could be involved.”

Conjecture. Throwing darts.

We'd have to be smoking serious crack to trade Hunter Clark for a future second.
 
As I said, you’re well aware of my thoughts (which wasn’t a box of pringles, but we obviously disagree).

I can only assume that you’d like me to post my thoughts in here, so you can get some back pats from your own.

What I will say is that I’m looking forward to Hunter being in North colours next year.

Cheers
Stavro, this clown is too much of a coward to give us the BS he spouts on his own board.

Can you all enlighten us what he was suggesting please. I need a good laugh.

These norfies realise that Clark is contracted don't they?
 
Not at all.

You wouldnt trade Hill plus 9 for pick 1?

Seriously?

Or Hunter Clark and 9 for pick 1.

What would you trade for pick 1?

Saints 9 will end up 10 and the elite talent will be gone.

Saints need elite talent. Yes or no?
Hill and 9 for 1 yes. Would never happen.
Clark and 9 for 1 no.

Sent from my SM-S908E using Tapatalk
 
Clark and the club both have come to agreement that trade is best for both going forward. Saints aren’t happy with Clark’s attitude during injury lay off and Clark also now happy to move on after receiving the negative feedback. Not sure that North are the only club Saints and Clarke are looking at a trade with but he wants to stay in Victoria.
Confirms the info I got. Club said they would explore trading him. Originally he wasn't happy because he wanted to stay but obviously been told you might get traded would be deflating.

Sent from my SM-S908E using Tapatalk
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Work rate is learnable. I'm loathe to trade players with abilities that seem to be innate (can't be taught) and also are not already existent in other players on the list.

Clark for a future second is dereliction of duty on behalf of our list managers if it does go ahead.
Anything less than a decent first round pick for him considering he is contracted would be an absolute disgrace. Typical St.Kilda thing to do.

Sent from my SM-S908E using Tapatalk
 
North are not getting clark
logue and now tucker have nominated north bye bye compo picks they don't have the picks unless they trade next years first which is probably pick 1 to 4 which is overs and the afl would stop ot especially after the bailout

Best case trading wise is clark to gws as will definately have the picks from hopper taranto Hill bruhn
trades or gold coast or Collingwood with the Grundy and Henry trades.
 
So… next season… apparentlyif random trade bullshit is to be believed

SENIORS
B: Webster - Howard - Wilkie
HB: Coffield - Battle - Sinclair
C: McKenzie - Ross - Billings
HF: Higgins - Membrey - Windhager
F: Gresham - King - Butler
Foll: Marshall - Steele - Crouch

Int: Wood Hayes Paton Jones
Sub: Wang.-Milera

SANDRINGHAM
B: Highmore - Hartigan - *****
HB: Connolly - Adams - Lienert
C: ***** - ***** - *****
HF: Peris - Xerri - Allison
F: Sharman - Heath - *****
Foll: Campbell - Owens - *****

————————————————

In; Hartigan Xerri

Out; Hannebery Geary Ryder Long Bytel Byrnes Clark Hill

The EXCITEMENT!!

Oof.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Stavro, this clown is too much of a coward to give us the BS he spouts on his own board.

Can you all enlighten us what he was suggesting please. I need a good laugh.

These norfies realise that Clark is contracted don't they?
Blokes been going on about Clark + Hill for some random useless pick for Atleast a week.

Then tried to tell me and BrutThough bird_man that Cal Twomey said Hill is a salary dump.

So we watched the clip and all Twomey said was along the lines of. If the saints wanted to trade Hill it would be with that in mind.

He literally is one of those annoying pricks who takes the slightest shred of info and runs and tells the world as if it’s fact.

Case in point with Edmund today.

He is running off saying it’s done. Clark at North etc. second round pick.

Now Clark might get to north. But Edmund finished his bit of dribble saying the second round priority pick may be used.

It was so open ended it contradicts the first part of his statement.

I.e he has no ****ing idea.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top