Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2022 Trade Thread - Part III

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

IMO Clark+9 for 3 is no good (3 becomes 4 and everyone from Sheezel down has question marks) but if North really want him I would love us to roll the dice and swap future first rounders instead.

Could turn out worse than Clark+9 for 3, but back to back spoons, a percentage of 55 and a poor trade period suggests they will be off the pace for a little while longer. Worth a shot given the #1 pick situation next year.

Nth:
in: 6, F1 StK, Clark
out: 3, F1 Nth

StK:
in: F1 Nth, 24
out: F1 StK, 47, Clark

Hawks:
in: 3, 47
out: 6, 24
 
If Sam Weideman is a big name then everyone is a big name

Well if Sam Weideman is a big Demons name…

4XYpfHq.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
They also remain hopeful of trading for St Kilda’s Hunter Clark, who Rawlings said was “keen to come” if the Saints have a late change of heart and are willing to part with him.

“We got to a point where we didn’t think that we could get the best footy out of (Horne-Francis), if he was to stay in Melbourne for another year, given how strong the pull home is,” Rawlings told News Corp.

“When the request came through, no doubt it was disappointing. But having said that, we’ve got a player who obviously wants to be somewhere else.

“We want players at our football club who want to be here and want to play for the jumper and want to play for their mates.

“That’s not the case (with Horne-Francis), obviously, so we need to look at that and for our own playing group, make sure we can make a commitment to our group that we bring players in who want to be here.

Griffin Logue and Darcy Tucker are two great examples, and now with picks two and three and our future first and Port Adelaide’s future first, we’ve got the opportunity to bring in some quality individuals who are top-end footballers and characters.”

The Giants are strongly linked with promising key forward Aaron Cadman, who hails from country Victoria, but Rawlings said North Melbourne had struggled to separate the top three players, behind Ashcroft, on its draft board.

He is keeping those players to himself but are likely to be between George Wardlaw, Harry Sheezel, Elijah Tsatas and Cadman.

“If we pick at one, we’re going to get only one of those players, but by getting two and three in, we know we’re getting two of our top three players in this draft,” Rawlings said.

“And who knows? We might get our top two players.

“That was critical to the deal to move on one; that we needed two and three and now we’ve got two picks in next year’s draft, which looks special ... it’s going to be really good.”

Rawlings retains strong belief in the club’s playing list and believes there are brighter days ahead.

“We’ve got some great young talent, 24 and under, and we have obviously just added to it with a couple of players from another club (Logue and Tucker),” he said.

“We’re potentially picking two of our best two or three players in this year’s draft and we’re still sniffing around Hunter as well.”
 

Remove this Banner Ad

They hate it on their board and we hate it here.

But I’ll play along and hypothesise

Out: Clark and pick 9

In: pick 3, 15, Hayes

We also send one of those pick 40s the Roos got today to GWS to facilitate.

Try move up with our existing hand still?
Or what about

Out: Clark + 15 + 47
In: 3 + Hayes

Gives us: 3, 9, 28, 32, 85
 
North have been screwed in this LOL
I really don't think so. Like us it's better to get off Broadway and quietly go about building a team and a culture withput the temptation of hype.
They'll have 3 & 4 this year and a couple of late second rounders which is ideal in many ways. They should also split their No1 next year.
With the couple of seniors they traded in they'll be better off too.
JHF was a mistake for them but they now get an opportunity to reset after only 1 year.
It took us 5 years to fully realize the mistake of drafting McCartin and it set us back at least that much.
 
Would we entertain 28 and 32 to GWS for 19. Gives us the first pick of day 2. After 19 GWS doesn't have a pick till 53? Thoughts!
Would definitely have to give more I'd reckon. Probably a future 3rd or something.
First pick of the 2nd round holds a lot of value as seen by some previous trades for it on draft night
 
Would definitely have to give more I'd reckon. Probably a future 3rd or something.
First pick of the 2nd round holds a lot of value as seen by some previous trades for it on draft night
Agree very important pick. We need to look at trying to get it. If throwing in a future 3rd rounder is what is required then we should do it!
 
Agree very important pick. We need to look at trying to get it. If throwing in a future 3rd rounder is what is required then we should do it!
I agree, I'd probably do that deal as well. But I reckon for GWS, it's a pick you hold until the very end. Either pick a sliding player like Freo did with Johnson last year, or trade the pick away for big value like Port did in 2019. No reason for them to trade it right now
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I agree, I'd probably do that deal as well. But I reckon for GWS, it's a pick you hold until the very end. Either pick a sliding player like Freo did with Johnson last year, or trade the pick away for big value like Port did in 2019. No reason for them to trade it right now
In saying that 28 and 32 is more points value then 19. Or do we look at there pick 18? Is that more important then 19?
 
I agree, I'd probably do that deal as well. But I reckon for GWS, it's a pick you hold until the very end. Either pick a sliding player like Freo did with Johnson last year, or trade the pick away for big value like Port did in 2019. No reason for them to trade it right now
Still feel a lot to go down before Wednesday , hopefully something shakes free and gives us a opportunity to get another first round pick.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2022 Trade Thread - Part III

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top