Doedee and Borlase our only OOC players now.
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
List Mgmt. 2023 List Management and Trading
- Thread starter George CantStandYa
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Status
Doedee and Borlase our only OOC players now.
Still hoping the vet list and Parnell rules get up. The EH trade to the Giants would be handy, too
- Sep 28, 2016
- 11,081
- 23,055
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Question is who will be brave enough to Don the seemingly cursed #6 next year.?
Since Modra its been filled by Byrne, Nelson, Fergus Watts, Griffin, Gunston, Luke Thompson, Lever, Gibbs, Hately.
Not many legacy players in that bunch.
Since Modra its been filled by Byrne, Nelson, Fergus Watts, Griffin, Gunston, Luke Thompson, Lever, Gibbs, Hately.
Not many legacy players in that bunch.
No? I remember him being a classic case of "first round pick that underdelivered and now wants to return to his home state". The feeling was we were getting him at a bargain basement price because he had failed to deliver, and maybe he could turn it around from the comfort of home but nobody was very confident.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
In any event, all four delistings are obviously sensible decisions. No point in keeping any of them around clogging up our list when we've actually got some decent draft capital this year.
Unless a high-quality backman falls into our lap in the trade period for next to nothing, I'd prefer to just keep Borlase. He's fine, shouldn't cost us much, and will be replaced once Murray returns anyway.
Unless a high-quality backman falls into our lap in the trade period for next to nothing, I'd prefer to just keep Borlase. He's fine, shouldn't cost us much, and will be replaced once Murray returns anyway.
Just don’t give it to our FRP please lol
- May 16, 2015
- 19,104
- 27,021
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- WWTFC,Chelsea,Glasgow Celtic,Lech Poznan
Would it be nice to give 23 to Rankine.
Nah, let him make 22 his own IMO
- Mar 3, 2022
- 7,301
- 10,436
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Considering how often my body makes noises from basic movements I bloody wish I was.
I just don't see the point of waiting around, if we win a flag noone will care about the finesse of the moves, plus memberships go up with each big signing as would the belief of the players. I just think there is a lot of good to come from it than just draft capital.
Are you ITK or is it just IMO? If we turn McAdam leaving to Petty and losing only one of our 2nd rounder
- Banned
- #10,539
Not sure why a few folk here are getting stiffy's over Petty.
He's just done a linsfranc that Melbourne described as substantial and will require considerable rehab. But they're confident he'll ok "in the long run".
Haven't we already got enough players with long term injuries?
Including Taylor and Jones, who are also both happen to be recovering from linsfranc injuries. And some players are just never the same
He's just done a linsfranc that Melbourne described as substantial and will require considerable rehab. But they're confident he'll ok "in the long run".
Haven't we already got enough players with long term injuries?
Including Taylor and Jones, who are also both happen to be recovering from linsfranc injuries. And some players are just never the same
- Banned
- #10,540
You should dash over to the Draft and Trades board and quote it as fait accompli according to an ITK on this boardAre you ITK or is it just IMO? If we turn McAdam leaving to Petty and losing only one of our 2nd rounder
I dont have many of these but I believe this one to be true its not an opinion. I have no idea what we are giving up for Petty but I believe he is leaving demons.Are you ITK or is it just IMO? If we turn McAdam leaving to Petty and losing only one of our 2nd rounder
It wont be macadam I suspect that may be part of a separate 3 way trade which may involve grundy and hayward as reported
So are you telling us there's a possible straight swap with just McAdam......
correct which is why they are letting him go in contract
They think Petty is worth more than Rankine so.......You should dash over to the Draft and Trades board and quote it as fait accompli according to an ITK on this board
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Banned
- #10,545
I'm telling you Petty is furphy, at least at this point in time .. imo
- Banned
- #10,546
Hang on .. I can't keep up .. I thought we were getting Hayward in a 3 way with Melbourne and Sydney
I remember some in the media when we signed on Sloane saying we had plenty of list spots. It doesn't look that way. Two main list spots and three Rookies.
Himmelberg would create a spot but I feel we would need to replace him with a depth Ruck / forward. We also need to keep Borlase or get another key defender.
I would be shocked if a club isn't offering Gollant three years.
I think it’s fair to say the only rumour with genuine legs right now is CholHang on .. I can't keep up .. I thought we were getting Hayward in a 3 way with Melbourne and Sydney
The others have only been reported once, or have been from various C-grade sources
- Banned
- #10,549
Yeah .. and I'd be ok with Chol
And I'd also be ok if we took O'Sullivan in the draft
I'm going to run and duck for cover now
- Aug 30, 2021
- 23,500
- 48,361
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Thread starter
- #10,550
Better still, the Melbourne boardYou should dash over to the Draft and Trades board and quote it as fait accompli according to an ITK on this board
- Status
Similar threads
- Poll
