List Mgmt. 2023 Trade & List Management Thread

[King Corey]

Edit: will update if ppl happy for this to sticky

Ok starting the hit list of names mentioned in any rumour as linked to us for 2023 trade period.

• Mac Andrew
• Hunter Clark
• Zac Fisher
• Sam Flanders
• Mitch Georgiades
• Liam Henry
• Dougal Howard
• Lewis Melican
• Jack Silvagni
• Dylan Stephens
• Adam Tomlinson

 

[kangatragic]

All not contracted next year except Greenwood who apparently has triggered contract clause for next year. Plus Cunnington retirement. Can't see hardly any of those players at the club next year. That's a lot of players

 

[Roosurgence]

All not contracted next year except Greenwood who apparently has triggered contract clause for next year. Plus Cunnington retirement. Can't see hardly any of those players at the club next year. That's a lot of players
View attachment 1779042

Let’s hope most of them are gone.

 

[lockheed]

Let’s hope most of them are gone.

And here's hoping that the replacements are very much better and or have a much higher ceiling

 

[Roosurgence]

And here's hoping that the replacements are very much better and or have a much higher ceiling

Theirs not much of a ceiling to exceed in that lot.

 

[Val Keating]

Him thinking he has a better chance of success elsewhere (assumption)
Being mates with JHF
His questionable management
Not engaging on social media with our other players for milestones, personal events, etc

So not much then.

 

[Ashley B]

Our boy Sam Flanders with another 36 touches

Fisher another 28

Dow another 24

Flanders had I think 10 d in the first 10 m of the match, unbelievable.

 

[zoomba23]

It will hurt our skill and talent levels if he leaves, but will improve our character and integrity levels.

I'll agree with you there. But at what point do you grit your teeth and try and keep the talent you have? Can we even afford to lose his talent with this group of players?

 

[Shinboner1]

All not contracted next year except Greenwood who apparently has triggered contract clause for next year. Plus Cunnington retirement. Can't see hardly any of those players at the club next year. That's a lot of players
View attachment 1779042

Cut them all

 

[ToxicMegaPunts]

All not contracted next year except Greenwood who apparently has triggered contract clause for next year. Plus Cunnington retirement. Can't see hardly any of those players at the club next year. That's a lot of players
View attachment 1779042

 

[Rod Stroker]

I'll agree with you there. But at what point do you grit your teeth and try and keep the talent you have? Can we even afford to lose his talent with this group of players?

He's been the most talented player on our list since probably Wells. But if he's a bad egg, or doesn't want to be there, we're better off without him at this crucial time for the club when we need to build a solid cultural foundation for our next tilt

 

[Rod Stroker]

All not contracted next year except Greenwood who apparently has triggered contract clause for next year. Plus Cunnington retirement. Can't see hardly any of those players at the club next year. That's a lot of players
View attachment 1779042

Shiels will be there.

Would Free get the flick after just one year? We clearly need rucks, so if they don't secure another mature age ruck, he might get a reprieve.

 

[Rod Stroker]

So not much then.

So what do you have that convinces you he will be there next year? And don't say a contract because they're not worth anything these days.

 

[Shinboner1]

Shiels will be there.

Would Free get the flick after just one year? We clearly need rucks, so if they don't secure another mature age ruck, he might get a reprieve.

Isn't he still injured?
Can't be a stop gap if he isn't available to play

 

[the big lebowski]

So what do you have that convinces you he will be there next year? And don't say a contract because they're not worth anything these days.

• he’s playing the best footy of his career
• he’s clearly engaged with his teammates onfield - see him picking them up off the ground or hugging Larkey like he wants to spoon
• he seems engaged with his team mates off field going to watch the vfl last week
• contract does mean something as it’s a legally binding agreement. Sure he can request a trade but if it’s not in our interest we can say no

 

[shinboner magic]

Yeah let’s get a pack of choir boys that won’t cross the line when needed.

TT stays

 

[FootySmartSimpson]

Flanders had I think 10 d in the first 10 m of the match, unbelievable.

North, just get him.

Flanders (+ Salary), Pick 5>North
F1+2023 3rd, 2023 4th>Gold Coast

Goater Corr Reid/Curtin

Scott Davies-Uniacke Flanders
Xerri Sanders Wardlaw

Sheezel Larkey Thomas

+Sanders
+O’Sullivan (pick 5)
+Watson (pick 3)
+Curtin/Reid (pick 2)
+A.Reid/Caddy/McCabe/Edwards (Poort)

 

[Val Keating]

So what do you have that convinces you he will be there next year? And don't say a contract because they're not worth anything these days.

I don’t know either way. I’ve been convinced about trade rumours in the past that turned out to be rubbish, so I don’t really buy into them anymore.

 

[New_Roo]

Bit of AA action going on here... fill the team with inside mids and play them out of position so can fit them all in


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[SunnyBoner]

Flanders and Sanders might do my head in but I’ll take it!

 

[Shinboner1]

Bit of AA action going on here... fill the team with inside mids and play them out of position so can fit them all in


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

Worked for geelong

 

[Colby Cheer Squad]

Let’s hope most of them are gone.

And here's hoping that the replacements are very much better and or have a much higher ceiling

Theirs not much of a ceiling to exceed in that lot.

Cut them all

The problem with cutting up to 16 players in one hit is that you won't bring in 16 good players in one draft. Of course, we only get to replace 12 of them. We have to cut 4 without replacements due to the 2 long term injury top ups and the 2 additional listings we were granted as a concession last year. We may or may not keep that concession. But still, 12-14 selections in a draft is a lot when most of these selections would be passed over by every other club. We'd be taking on quite a few rookie list type players along with delisted free agents.

 

[Colby Cheer Squad]

Flanders and Sanders might do my head in but I’ll take it!

Maude and the Colonel. Sounds like a podcast waiting to happen.

 

[desie]

The problem with cutting up to 16 players in one hit is that you won't bring in 16 good players in one draft. Of course, we only get to replace 12 of them. We have to cut 4 without replacements due to the 2 long term injury top ups and the 2 additional listings we were granted as a concession last year. We may or may not keep that concession. But still, 12-14 selections in a draft is a lot when most of these selections would be passed over by every other club. We'd be taking on quite a few rookie list type players along with delisted free agents.

I feel like we’ll let go of about 14 including Magoo. That leaves us having to bring in ten.

Five or six from the draft including Sanders, a couple of rookie picks and another two or three from trade/DFA.

If the new regime are any good they should be able find enough from that to take us forward.

 

[roos_fanatic08]

I still think this trade has merit.

Say we end up with pick 2 & 3. (McKay leaves). We promise GC that we won’t bid on Walter with 2.

Trade pick 3 & Future 3rd to GC for Flanders & 5.

Might not seem fair, but if GC get ahead of the Walter bid they essentially end up with an additional first rounder top 5 pick (for Flanders) that they would never have had.

They get Walter & McKercher/Duursma

We get:

Flanders
Pick 2: Reid/Curtin
Pick 5: Watson

 

[The Nostradamus]

Flanders and Sanders might do my head in but I’ll take it!

Flanders to sanders surely someone takes that username if we get them