sainter7
Senior List
- Jul 21, 2025
- 177
- 546
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
This guy must be high. I'll take butters and 17 firsts. Actually no, I'm obsessed with NasFor NAS?
Surely you jest?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
This guy must be high. I'll take butters and 17 firsts. Actually no, I'm obsessed with NasFor NAS?
Surely you jest?
Dawson requested a trade home when out of contract and the Swans got a future first rounder. Unders absolutely, but an unfortunate reality of the situation.That’s not really our problem.
If he wants to go to the crows. YOU need to find the currency.
If these players don’t want to come to us. They might want to go elsewhere. There isn’t however a reality that 2 x steak knives players and 2 picks between 15-18 get this done.
You crow fans have hid behind, “they won’t want to go to stkilda” for 12 months. Well you don’t get a player better than anyone at crow land - that includes Dawson, if you can’t make things happen.
Same issue with Port.
They’re just not rational. There is nothing to be gained by going over there.On their forum they're saying "yes we want him but no way they're trading a top 15 player on their list for him". You won't trade a top 15 player on your TEAM for a top 3 player in the COMP? I ain't picking up the phone again lol
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Dawson & Rankine were nowhere near proven to the level Nas is right now.Dawson requested a trade home when out of contract and the Swans got a future first rounder. Unders absolutely, but an unfortunate reality of the situation.
Rankine was out of contract and Gold Coast got our pick 6. Reasonable at the time but probably still unders in retrospect.
The dogs lost a star in Smith to the Dogs for a late first rounder. Woefully inadequate, but what were they to do?
We lost prime Dangerfield for a first rounder, a second rounder and Dean Gore. It sucked then, it sucks now, but still we move on.
In contract? Demand the world for sure. But when they’re out of contract there’s not much you can do.
Hopefully he stays at the saints. Actually a big fan of your drafting - Travaglia was a personal favourite of mine last year and your haul since 2021 has been as good as anyone.
Not anymore hopeful than us.Plus picks for course. Hope you rob em blind - though I’m still hopeful he stays at your club.

No, North got pick 3 + F1 for JHF and effectively swapped their pick 1 for 2. Port Power only gave pick 8 + F1 for him.Dawson & Rankine were nowhere near proven to the level Nas is right now.
Smith had significant issues off field and coming off a knee reco whilst simultaneously having a broke relationship with the dogs.
Dangerfield was a free agent who you agreed to trade for slightly more.
None are comparable to the level of talent that is proven as Nas is right now and not a free agent
Reality is, it’s the saints or Adelaide. He doesn’t get to a SA club without a trade and he isn’t managed by Paul Connors.
The last player manager by Williams to **** off was JHF. The Roos effectively got pick 8 + a future first.
Nas is more than that.
Taking unders is different to taking significant unders.Dawson requested a trade home when out of contract and the Swans got a future first rounder. Unders absolutely, but an unfortunate reality of the situation.
Rankine was out of contract and Gold Coast got our pick 6. Reasonable at the time but probably still unders in retrospect.
The dogs lost a star in Smith to the Dogs for a late first rounder. Woefully inadequate, but what were they to do?
We lost prime Dangerfield for a first rounder, a second rounder and Dean Gore. It sucked then, it sucks now, but still we move on.
In contract? Demand the world for sure. But when they’re out of contract there’s not much you can do.
Hopefully he stays at the saints. Actually a big fan of your drafting - Travaglia was a personal favourite of mine last year and your haul since 2021 has been as good as anyone.
No, Port traded pick 8 and a future first for him.No, North got pick 3 + F1 for JHF and effectively swapped their pick 1 for 2. Port Power only gave pick 8 + F1 for him.
End of the day, none of that really matters. It’ll mean more draft picks, but players? Not so much.Dawson & Rankine were nowhere near proven to the level Nas is right now.
Smith had significant issues off field and coming off a knee reco whilst simultaneously having a broke relationship with the dogs.
Dangerfield was a free agent who you agreed to trade for slightly more.
None are comparable to the level of talent that is proven as Nas is right now and not a free agent
Reality is, it’s the saints or Adelaide. He doesn’t get to a SA club without a trade and he isn’t managed by Paul Connors.
The last player manager by Williams to **** off was JHF. The Roos effectively got pick 8 + a future first.
Nas is more than that.
Where is the pick 12 that GWS threw away?No, Port traded pick 8 and a future first for him.
North then trade pick 1 + pick 8 (plus smaller picks) for picks 2+3
So in short, they turned pick 1 and JHF into picks 2 + 3 + PA future first (ignoring the smaller pick stuff here)
Significantly missing the point. Adelaide and port fans like to tell us that all their gun players are staying. But here are future picks and steak knives.The thing is, none of that stuff really matters.
Player power has never been stronger. Crows fans are more than aware. It is what it is.
You’ll never get what you want as compensation. Draft picks? Sure. But you can’t move players who don’t want to be moved. And I’m guessing any player you would want from either club are contracted.
We know how it works. I get you’re passionate, but reality sucks when it comes to trade week. Like I said, let’s hope we stays.
End of the day, none of that really matters. It’ll mean more draft picks, but players? Not so much.
If the players you request are contracted and don’t want to move, there’s nothing you can do. We can’t trade them against their will nor would we want to, much like I’m sure you wouldn’t (and likely couldn’t) trade away Phillipou, Tauru or Travaglia.
Crows fans understand this all too well. It sucks, but it’s reality. I understand the passion and frustration, having been in that position numerous times.
Like I said, I hope he stays. It sucks losing gun players.
It ended up with west coast along with pick 8.Where is the pick 12 that GWS threw away?
That’s more realistic but on the final day of trade period, with Ben Williams breathing down your ear, what happens if your demands aren’t met?Significantly missing the point. Adelaide and port fans like to tell us that all their gun players are staying. But here are future picks and steak knives.
It’s all junk.
We don’t have to have your good players come here.
We can turn around and tell you that we want 2 x top 10 picks and a later first rounder this year.
You work out how to get that with your 25/26/27 firsts and your steak knives.
If the player has no visible path to SA he doesn’t get there without a trade.That’s more realistic but on the final day of trade period, with Ben Williams breathing down your ear, what happens if your demands aren’t met?
History shows clubs eventually cave, even if it takes until the final five minutes. Because when a player is out of contract, your hands are tied.
Clubs will be amicable enough to not ruin future relationships with other clubs as well as managers. But they won’t give the world up because they don’t have to, not when a player is out of contract.
If the player has no visible path to SA he doesn’t get there without a trade.
He doesn’t get past west coast in either draft pick 1. He doesn’t want another club outside of the saints or the one in SA.
And Ben Williams. Bloke is an absolute loser who has treated us like crap. Do you think SOS & co are concerned about their relationship with him?
Paul Connors he is not.
So, again the OOC threat you use. Is baseless and useless. There hasn’t been a player outside of free agency as good as Nas leave in a very long time.
Free agency doesn’t matter, the player is uncontracted regardless.If the player has no visible path to SA he doesn’t get there without a trade.
He doesn’t get past west coast in either draft pick 1. He doesn’t want another club outside of the saints or the one in SA.
And Ben Williams. Bloke is an absolute loser who has treated us like crap. Do you think SOS & co are concerned about their relationship with him?
Paul Connors he is not.
So, again the OOC threat you use. Is baseless and useless. There hasn’t been a player outside of free agency as good as Nas leave in a very long time.
But nobody fools you hey champ. You are the smartest guy in the room, aren't you sport?Half this forum is getting taken for a ride. The so called ITK's saying Tuesday is the day and making up as much crap as everyone else.
Great viewing
What if he were to be unwilliamsed?Can we just pay ben williams out and get nas a new manager what sort of commission is he wanting anyway. At what point does someone close to Nas step in and say mate this big brother contestant is out of his depth time to go

No current season stats available
Ok, maybe it's too much of a long bow and I shouldn't have added in the edit bit 