- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #5,203
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
People might laugh at my suggestion but Kane Farrel would transform our transition.
I don't wallow in doom and gloom because I don't buy into hope and faith - the view I posted above is my opinion about how things work and what things look like for Carlton in the next couple of years.Collingwood, Adelaide & Gold Coast both missed finals last year.. it can turn quickly with some shrewd well-planned acquisitions and growth from the playing list. Its not doom and gloom, we fix our run and carry issues, and I am confident we have the body of a list that can bounce back quickly and contend next year.
Agree with this, this season Doch, Acres, Saad & Gov should have been dropped well before they did and would have stamped a level of authority and expectation that torching the ball as badly as they did wouldn't be tolerated.Correct, all coaches have favourites, but you destroy your teams culture and standards in the way Voss did it.
Allowing a senior player to continue to play when they are in poor form (McGov) and dropping the same blokes every other week ( Kemp, JSOS, Young) sends out 2 very different messages to the playing group and doesn't assist the player who is in poor form.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Why do we obsess so much over that one player coming into the club to make virtually all of the difference? Sometimes it's our first draft pick and others times it's a potential trade. Everything else is a crapshoot or us scraping together the final spots on our list as a kind of necessary afterthought. The attitude of drip-feeding our list (no matter how big the 'drip') while other players age or drop away has to change. The best analogy is like poring hot water into a cold bath, it doesn't take long for it to get cold again.Reckon our salary cap would have a nice Zak Butters hole in it come 26
Reckon next year we could have Jagga and Moir in there and HOF would be too if fit. Year after add Walker and Dean.I'm very concerned that once again we are getting to the end of the cycle of elite players and aren't going to get it done eg Gibbs, Murphy Kruezer (Judd) era repeats as Cripps, Charlie, Harry, Weitering age out.
We don't have a single player in the top 22 of the under 22 and I doubt we would have in the U25 this year with Walsh our only entry the previous year.
I don't think our draw can get easier than this year given our likely ladder position at the end of the season.
Why would he leave if we matched?If we want to Match the de dekoning bid to force a trade, do we have to prove we have the salary cap room. Just wondering in relation to McGovern situation.
If Walsh can stay in the condition he returned in, we are a long way to not needing to recruit mature mids. Jagga Smith, (touch wood)Cody Walker, Cooper Lord and the as yet unheralded Ben Camporeale teamed with Adam Cerra and the ageing bulls Cripps and Hewett isn’t a bad line up.Reckon our salary cap would have a nice Zak Butters hole in it come 26
As an RFA, we have the right to match the accepted offer.How does 'forcing a trade' work? You match an offer with the understanding that 'said' player is not going to sign it?
Both are quick, Ison has skills but needs work on reading where to pass.There were some interesting comments by Voss yesterday, stated that we will be going after speed and quality ball use in the off season, which seems tricky as Dean and Ison as far as i know, dont address the speed component.
I dont know how well we can address these areas by losing players like Silvagni and Acres, both get us points for the draft but for a team already lacking depth, we would need to add 3-4 senior players to be ahead of where we currently sit.
We finish top 4 next year....bookmark thisLook like we will turn over 8 -9 players at end of season. We will be losing lots of experience too. JSOS, TDK, Gov. that’s a rebuild in my book. Don’t expect a rise up the ladder any time soon
I think it's a really tough line for most coaches to walk - when do you pull the trigger on a proven player because of "form", and how long do you afford them in the seniors to try and recapture their form.
I think it was exacerbated for us as well because there were so many players out of form - what was Voss gonna do, drop Weiters, Gov and Haynes after R1? Drop Cripps and Cerra at the same time? Play with only 3 forwards?
I'm not buying into the whole 'going after speed' idea. Sure we need a couple of players with better disposal but our problem is more with hitting targets than Speed. By the time we actually recruit & develop the whole run & gun fad will have passed and it will be whatever has evolved to combat it.There were some interesting comments by Voss yesterday, stated that we will be going after speed and quality ball use in the off season, which seems tricky as Dean and Ison as far as i know, dont address the speed component.
I dont know how well we can address these areas by losing players like Silvagni and Acres, both get us points for the draft but for a team already lacking depth, we would need to add 3-4 senior players to be ahead of where we currently sit.
Are we getting Reid or Butters?We finish top 4 next year....bookmark this
No, few tweaks. That's all we need. People forget that for most of this season we were top 4 in most stats except a couple here and there. Just wait and seeAre we getting Reid or Butters?
Almost top four for the losses stat as wellNo, few tweaks. That's all we need. People forget that for most of this season we were top 4 in most stats except a couple here and there. Just wait and see
Sorry, I'm a carlton supporter. I prefer to look at the not so obvious wins we had and be positive. I think we will be top 4. Just some tweaks needed. Obviously GW and others who have a better view of it all agree with me or they would have launched VossyAlmost top four for the losses stat as well
I agree with your point, however it's important to note that I think there's a few players on our list who could be as good if not better than a lot of those named, they just haven't been given the opportunity/role due to us for most of the year trying to contend for finals. Cowan, Lord and HOF have all shown that they have elite attributes and will be a core of our side for years to come. And you also can't forget that arguably our most promising player hasn't even played a single AFL level game.I'm very concerned that once again we are getting to the end of the cycle of elite players and aren't going to get it done eg Gibbs, Murphy Kruezer (Judd) era repeats as Cripps, Charlie, Harry, Weitering age out.
We don't have a single player in the top 22 of the under 22 and I doubt we would have in the U25 this year with Walsh our only entry the previous year.
I don't think our draw can get easier than this year given our likely ladder position at the end of the season.
If Dylan Shiel is prepared to play for $400k is he worth a 2 year contract?
I'm not really buying into any of it.I'm not buying into the whole 'going after speed' idea. Sure we need a couple of players with better disposal but our problem is more with hitting targets than Speed. By the time we actually recruit & develop the whole run & gun fad will have passed and it will be whatever has evolved to combat it.
I think our contested brand is pretty good and holds up - provided we can hit targets, and get our forward line functional, with Players finding space and elite kick to honor them.