- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #5,203
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty AFLW Notice Img
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
They have a better list, far more skillful players.
If we have 6 players on roughly 1M each, that brings the average for the rest down markedly.
Then, we'd have 12 M for players 38 players. Even paying 180k for 15 players leaves around 9M for 20 (ish) players.
If JSOS and TDK leave via free agency we only receive the one compo pick. Is that correct?I wonder what Pies have on us then in terms of the offer. Reports were Pies was 4 years I thought. Maybe slightly more money per year.
Cinc needs to be elevated to the senior list which o think means a 2 year deal.Really interested as to why we would.delist Cincotta?
I would delist 10 before him. He plays tough
Is it injury related?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Wouldnt mind Marshall for us.I’d be offering NAS that money God help them if they lose him.
Also Marshall won’t be there should TDK land there.
NoIf JSOS and TDK leave via free agency we only receive the one compo pick. Is that correct?
If JSOS and TDK leave via free agency we only receive the one compo pick. Is that correct?
Can be 1 year contractCinc needs to be elevated to the senior list which o think means a 2 year deal.
No we would receive a pick for each player. TDK would be band 1 for sure. JSOS probably band 2 or 3.If JSOS and TDK leave via free agency we only receive the one compo pick. Is that correct?
TDK, Cripps, Curnow, McKay, Weitering, Walsh? Ok.Yep. 6 at close to or around $1m each.
Sure, though I would have thought Doc's salary was on the decline.Docherty*, Saad, Williams,
Figured they were the other way around.Hewett's new contract, Cerra on a bit less but still significant money.
Pittonet? I hope not... definitely trade him then, pay a small percentage of the contract if required.Pittonet and Acres probably at above average salaries too.
You’re the only ‘small’ poster I trust to consistently make this place fun for all.Zac Williams is the only 'small' forward I trust to consistently make the most of his opportunities near goal.
The only difference is you're able to match and force trades with RFA's. Compo still follows the same formula. For example Josh Battle was a UFA last year and triggered band 1He is a FA, I thought only RFA's triggered compo, good be wrong though.
Someone's gotta ******* kick goals around here!!!You’re the only ‘small’ poster I trust to consistently make this place fun for all.
There is a shortage of people like you around here.
Someone's gotta ******* kick goals around here!!!
CheersThe only difference is you're able to match and force trades with RFA's. Compo still follows the same formula. For example Josh Battle was a UFA last year and triggered band 1
Cats i reckon.Or another club is having a go
What are you doing next Sunday?
Asking for a certain list manager...
Saints now offering TDK 8 years at $1.8M on Ch7 Sports news bulletin in Slowbart

I have the attributes of several AFL footballers...
Levi Casboult's goal kicking
Caleb Daniel's height (almost)
Mickey Nolan's physique
Caleb Marchbank's durability
Toby Greene's maturity
Lance Whitnall's nutritional habits
Kane Lucas's clearance work
Figured they were the other way around.
I don’t give a rats about “mentor” (who has he actually mentored in 10 years of footy?), “footy smarts” or “desperation” if you can’t actually get out on the park.
Even when he has he’s finished top 10 once, at 10, in the bnf and nowhere else close to that.
The deal we have on the table is over the odds already, if he wasn’t a free agent it wouldn’t and should be less.
It is about the “name” and peoples emotional attachment to it, he’s serviceable but serviceable at the amount of money and tenure the filth are offering I’d prefer to take the end of round 1 minimum compensation we’d get and use that to bring in Harry Dean and bank the significant cap space we’d release.
For me, this is not about his name at all, it's about whether the club can afford to lose him, especially over what sounds like a trifling amount.
Throw in too many missed tackles defensively, and also unawareness of surroundings when he has the ball so he either chooses wrong targets, or ultimately gets tackled.He's not clean enough.
Fumbles or second grabs far too often IMHO.
That's a non-negotiable for his position.