roos_fanatic08 if Mitch Marsh were to fall to our picks, which he may well, should we take his higher talent as a 3rd tall or a genuine tall with some ??s on them?
Give me the genuine tall. Particularly if it’s Emmett. Ludo and Marsh I’d probably have on a par.
I just don’t think we can afford to have another undersized 3rd tall type forward on the list. Curtis/Zurhaar/Duursma is more than enough.
With Marsh I’m a bit concerned that most of his possessions come from marks, he also isn’t a particularly good ground level player nor a particularly good pressure player. He isn’t going to get the freedom to mark the ball at AFL level like he does in juniors and if he doesn’t have any facets in his game he is going to struggle.
On the plus side, his athleticism is really good so there is plenty of good developmental upside purely on that.




