LeeCarvallo
Debutant
- Jul 2, 2025
- 128
- 231
- AFL Club
- Gold Coast
If he kicks his season average vs Essendon on Wednesday he'll be 10+ in front of Thilthorpe which is stretching the gap a fair bit5 goals or so isnt enough to ignore everything else
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
If he kicks his season average vs Essendon on Wednesday he'll be 10+ in front of Thilthorpe which is stretching the gap a fair bit5 goals or so isnt enough to ignore everything else
What is a forward in the team for though?
He's the second best in the league at kicking goals and has the best conversion rate of anyone in the conversation by quite a margin. Why is it relevant whether he had an couple of touches on the wing or a handful of hitouts.
Thillthorpe is the pick of the bunch for mine. If he kicks 10. Id consider for the 3rdIf he kicks his season average vs Essendon on Wednesday he'll be 10+ in front of Thilthorpe which is stretching the gap a fair bit
Wednesday night's game shouldn't even be considered when selecting the AA team.If he kicks his season average vs Essendon on Wednesday he'll be 10+ in front of Thilthorpe which is stretching the gap a fair bit
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Also it is not a stat that exists but I really wish "effective metres gained" was a stat, where they count the metres gained from effective disposals only. I think that would tell us so much more about a player than the simple disposal numbers, or the disposal efficiency numbers as well.
They do track effective metres gained, they just don't release it publicly. Currently Karl Amon leads the league in effective metres gained at 500m per game.
I really do not understand this as the AFL owns the majority of Champion Data, and getting more fan engagement with the stats can only be a good thing, so why don't the AFL just release all the data that Champion Data make so us fans can have better and more detailed conversations.
Thillthorpe is the pick of the bunch for mine. If he kicks 10. Id consider for the 3rd
Thats my teamBen King is in the mix and deserves to be in the squad. Finishing 2nd in the Coleman is absolutely noteworthy (and makes him close). However, I'd be a little disappointed if he was given the 3rd tall spot, even if he did kick 10. If he kicked 10, it would move his goal average to be equal with Jack Gunston (with whom he is currently tied on goals from 2 extra games). However, Gunston has nearly triple the assists, way more score involvements, way more of the ball, way more marks, double the tackles, more than double the inside 50's, more than double the metres gained, etc, etc (Gunston is also much more suited to a 3rd tall spot than King). Gunston is also involved in over 32% of Hawthorn's scores (the highest of any of the contenders, including Cameron) whilst Ben King is at 20%.
Thilthorpe, as you say, has been dominant all over the ground and then goes forward to impact to great effect, whilst helping put in the ruck. Also helps he plays for the minor premiers. It's not "a couple more possessions on the wing" (as the other guy said) - RT gets twice as much of the ball, way more marks, contested marks, assists, score involvements, contested possessions, metres gained, etc and still has 55 goals. RT has 60 Coaches votes to King's 16, which feels about right. If King has a massive day out and ends up with 15+ more goals than Thilthorpe then maaaybe they might decide to put RT on the bench as the flexible forward/2nd ruck to fit them both in (ala Jarryd Roughead back in the day) but I doubt it.
For me, the tall forwards pick themselves. Cameron, Thilthorpe and Gunston. Naughton next in line and King after that (both squad).
Just putting it out there no Hawthorn defenders? We are one of the best defences in the comp.
Battle, Amon and Impey all should be in the discussion for the 40.
It doesn't always work like that.
Hawthorn will very likely finish 3rd for points conceded.
Geelong will finish 4th but there is nobody really in contention. Sometimes it just works out that 6 or 7 players doing a good job equals a better defence than teams who rely heavily on a couple.
What is a forward in the team for though?
He's the second best in the league at kicking goals and has the best conversion rate of anyone in the conversation by quite a margin. Why is it relevant whether he had an couple of touches on the wing or a handful of hitouts.
Gawn about to be selected for the 8th time and joins some legends of the game.
Very little argument against him being the greatest ruckman of all time.
Madden a better player but I'd argue Gawn is a better ruckman.Other than him not being as important to the game as Polly Farmer or as good a ruckman as Simon Madden.
The question is whether he is better than Cox. And the answer to that would be yes.
Be patient, they're comingCan't wait for the Fadgelow POWER rankings.

Be patient, they're coming
Though it is very tight at the top, and the order will inevitably change throughout the finals series.
Bont not in the mix - he missed too many games and won't make up any ground on the leaders without a finals series.No Dogs except Bont please