2025 Rolling ALL-Australian Team

[LOLchie Schultz]

It's ok, no one takes the AA seriously anymore after last night. It's a home and away award controlled by Kane Cornes.
The concept has become farcical besides that when you look at some of the players that have got in multiple times.

I do. One or two questionable selections each year doesnt make it farcical. It means that there are a lot of opinions, most that dont matter, with only 22 positions available.

Yes, Cornes is a ****. However, i cant see him standing over anyone, directly or indirectly!

Im sure if each selector gave their own team, we'd all find a selection or two we dont agree with!

 

[HeHateMe]

Cornes saying Battle takes the best forward... and says Vlastuin & Battle play different roles, they both play intercept roles.
the only difference is their height.

Vlastuin is better in most statistical areas, so is Worrell

“As a nine-person selection committee, yes.” it's pretty obvious that Battle was Cornes call he is such a bias fanboy.

Four mids on the bench? King and Cornes discuss the All-Australian team

There were some glaring omissions.

www.sen.com.au

Reading that shows that battles efforts in the reverse Colman had alot to do with it. Some of these defensive stats just aren't released so threads like this one that's hovering over stats all year, some of Battles key statistics areas have just been overlooked.

Every year people are calling for them to select per position and pick defenders who defend not just attack well, they finally made that call here and people are getting worked up...

 

[Mr Meeseeks]

It's ok, no one takes the AA seriously anymore after last night. It's a home and away award controlled by Kane Cornes.
The concept has become farcical besides that when you look at some of the players that have got in multiple times.

You sound bitter.

...

 

[Aristotle Pickett the3rd]

I do. One or two questionable selections each year doesnt make it farcical. It means that there are a lot of opinions, most that dont matter, with only 22 positions available.

Yes, Cornes is a ****. However, i cant see him standing over anyone, directly or indirectly!

Im sure if each selector gave their own team, we'd all find a selection or two we dont agree with!

It's only a home and away award. It doesn't include the most important games of the year.
It rewards outside players who don't get injured much .

 

[Coasters7]

Reading that shows that battles efforts in the reverse Colman had alot to do with it. Some of these defensive stats just aren't released so threads like this one that's hovering over stats all year, some of Battles key statistics areas have just been overlooked.

Every year people are calling for them to select per position and pick defenders who defend not just attack well, they finally made that call here and people are getting worked up...

Fair enough but Keane and Worrell are the two that missed out. The two best “defending defenders” all year.

 

[gambinotosserflog]

You sound bitter.

says the guy trying to convince everyone that sydney stack is better than sam walsh.

 

[Aristotle Pickett the3rd]

says the guy trying to convince everyone that sydney stack is better than sam walsh.

So you didn't want Franklin as captain?

 

[HeHateMe]

Fair enough but Keane and Worrell are the two that missed out. The two best “defending defenders” all year.

We just haven't seen the stats to confirm that which is annoying the AFL should release more for us to consume.

My view looking at the team was they determine Battle was the best defenders that defends this season. With Clark in the other pocket as more a hybrid. You have to remember Battle also plays tall and small.

Keane was probably competing the Taylor and Andrews on talls, Worrell on the other hand was awesome offensively but going off what kornes said in that article doesn't sound like they believe he had the record or nullify the quality Battle did.

 

[PhatBoy]

It's ok, no one takes the AA seriously anymore and not just after last night. It's a home and away award controlled by Kane Cornes.
The concept has become farcical besides that when you look at some of the players that have got in multiple times.

I heard Kane Cornes was in charge of holding back nuclear power in Australia and helped India in the 2001 series win over Australia.

That’s just what I heard, not sure if it’s true or not.

 

[Snuffaluphagus]

The 4 mids thing on the bench is funny but I like that they effectively said, forwards and backs named on the field first.

Always a few head scratchers and questionable calls the four obvious ones this year being

• Battle over Vlastuin and Worrell which I think is just fundamentally wrong and not sure if anyone bar Hawks fans are going to try to justify it.
• Elliot over Bailey for mine given it's already got the fwd/mid in Pickett. I dont think many Lions fans thought he'd get in. Bailey is an absolute superstar when on though so not too aggrieved, deserves at least one nod in his career.
• Serong was definitely lucky, Holmes and Butters were, if not definitive like I said earlier, still probably better. Was tagged as much as Daicos though which might have got him the gong and Butters when tagged fell apart. I'd have rathered squeeze a defender or forward over any of those three names anyway.
• Cameron as captain, confusing even the man himself...

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

You realise they don’t actually play yeah?

We have a best captains award and it was given out.

So why call it captain if it's not about captaincy?

Clearly you don't think leadership should be valued for a captain.

The AA have made a mockery of the captaincy.

Even Jezza thought it was a joke!

 

[Spook]

Yes Battle never had many goals kicked on him, so surely in a side so dominant, won a lot of games of footy, the coaches would’ve rewarded him with more votes.

Just asking.

Battle got 33 votes. How did the others go? Same ish?

 

[gambinotosserflog]

The 4 mids thing on the bench is funny but I like that they effectively said, forwards and backs named on the field first.

Always a few head scratchers and questionable calls the four obvious ones this year being

• Battle over Vlastuin and Worrell which I think is just fundamentally wrong and not sure if anyone bar Hawks fans are going to try to justify it.
• Elliot over Bailey for mine given it's already got the fwd/mid in Pickett. I dont think many Lions fans thought he'd get in. Bailey is an absolute superstar when on though so not too aggrieved, deserves at least one nod in his career.
• Serong was definitely lucky, Holmes and Butters were, if not definitive like I said earlier, still probably better. Was tagged as much as Daicos though which might have got him the gong and Butters when tagged fell apart. I'd have rathered squeeze a defender or forward over any of those three names anyway.
• Cameron as captain, confusing even the man himself...

Bailey is an absolute WTF. great player, but not a career defining season. Serong is a west coast call

 

[gambinotosserflog]

It's only a home and away award. It doesn't include the most important games of the year.
It rewards outside players who don't get injured much .

LOL. Thanks Captain Obvious.

 

[Aristotle Pickett the3rd]

It's sad because these AA awards are becoming worthless.
The only awards that have credibility are are the AFLPA award, the coaches award and club best and fairest awards.

 

[PhatBoy]

It doesn't include the most important games of the year.

Then why as a tigers fan have you spent the last 5 hours wetting the bed over it

 

[Trav 20]

It's sad because these AA awards are becoming worthless.
The only awards that have credibility are are the AFLPA award, the coaches award and club best and fairest awards.

The AFLPA ?

Plenty of players barely watch other games. Some do joke selections for fun.

The AFLPA are the worst of the lot.

Wait, this is a Dusty thing, right ? Only 4 AA. Got it.

 

[Wojcinski]

Every year people get so personally offended when they don't agree with the lineup of a team that'll never play a game

Why

 

[Aristotle Pickett the3rd]

The AFLPA ?

Plenty of players barely watch other games. Some do joke selections for fun.

The AFLPA are the worst of the lot.

Wait, this is a Dusty thing, right ? Only 4 AA. Got it.

Name an unworthy AFLPA winner

 

[Aristotle Pickett the3rd]

Every year people get so personally offended when they don't agree with the lineup of a team that'll never play a game

Why

Because of rampant Geelong bias.

 

[00Stinger]

The AA captain seems more of a lifetime achievement recognition than making the best actual captain the captain of the AA team, hence why guys like Dangerfield, Franklin, Hawkins, Rance have been made AA captain in the past

yeah its lost all meaning and has for a few years now

I mean if you want a life time achievement award, how about giving it to a bloke who just equaled the recod AA's selections and if actually his teams captain?

 

[Trav 20]

Name an unworthy AFLPA winner

I never said there was one.

But all of their awards are the ones I take least notice of.

 

[Wojcinski]

Because of rampant Geelong bias.

Geelong had 2 players in the team. One of them won the Coleman medal and one of them won the AFLCA player of the year award. #head****ed by Geelong on show

 

[Mr Meow]

Geelong had 2 players in the team. One of them won the Coleman medal and one of them won the AFLCA player of the year award. #head****ed by Geelong on show

They just snuck in due to Geelong bias with their 80+ goals and 100+ coaches votes respectively.

 

[JHF1870]

This year's selection panel has a strong whiff of people who are trying to be overly clever and off-trend, but have just made themselves look like idiots.

No Worrell or Elliot. Daicos and Bont on the bench. Cameron as captain (well played to Jezza, knew it was a genuine pisstake).

You kniw what it is. The selectors are pretentious. They're like a bunch of film critics that would come out and say we as supporters wouldnt understand because we didnt play at the highest level.

The Battle decision was probably based on some stupid metric theyll tell us they know best