Remove this Banner Ad

Mega Thread 2026 Media & Miscellaneous Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tonga Bob
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Any one hear Kath Loghnan callout King tonight after the game. She raised the Dockers win today and asked for their opinions, King being King immediately to rant about what the Lions did wrong. Kath said no, we are going to talk Fremantle, you can talk about your Lions later. Great work Kath.
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

The Round so Far this week is an extraordinary watch if you want to hear people getting paid to basically make errors repeatedly. Apparently we beat the Bulldogs by less than a goal and they are also great defensively. Really pulled out the B Team last night.
 
The Round so Far this week is an extraordinary watch if you want to hear people getting paid to basically make errors repeatedly. Apparently we beat the Bulldogs by less than a goal and they are also great defensively. Really pulled out the B Team last night.
They love the bulldogs
 
Whoever runs the footy stats websites need to intervene with their own algorithms. Sydney go +4 points on Wheelo for thrashing Richmond. That game should have zero value for evaluating Sydney lol.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Freo beat reigning premiers in Brisbane to be #1 gets 5 stories on The West Australian Sport (including negative reports about Freo injuries). WCEs gets 8 stories (including calls for Ginbey to be AA) to defeat a undermanned team (on the bottom of the ladder), with no coach - that’s worth 8 stories ?!?!??
 
Dunno if anyone else saw The Sunday Footy Show but Lloyd did a deep dive on the Demo Derby and he was absolutely loving the biff. It wouldn't surprise me if he had a semi during that segment.
 
Whoever runs the footy stats websites need to intervene with their own algorithms. Sydney go +4 points on Wheelo for thrashing Richmond. That game should have zero value for evaluating Sydney lol.

Yeah, been following our squiggle evaluation this year (which collects all the algorithms), some weird things happen. Hawks went up points a few weeks ago after losing to us, same with their loss to Melbs. Whereas we've won 11 in a row and are still ranked 4th in their seedings.
 
Whoever runs the footy stats websites need to intervene with their own algorithms. Sydney go +4 points on Wheelo for thrashing Richmond. That game should have zero value for evaluating Sydney lol.
I obviously don't know why Sydney got such a boost from pumping a injury hit Richmond team, but I have done a little digging around the edges around why we've remained relatively low on the power rankings or equivalent of most algorithms.

I find it particularly interesting as I'm still a little sceptical of our ability to perform in September, yet, given our inability to build the experience in what I still consider very different footy.

Taking a look at the Wheelo predictions/simulations, which is just one small example and also output and not input based, but it does suggest a couple of things.
Essentially it is very confident we'll finish high on the ladder, and also rates us as a high chance to reach a prelim, but then a higher chance of crashing out at the prelim stage.

I doubt it or most other models are putting additional emphasis on September results, but it's in the head to head against the top teams that I suspect we're getting discounted.
So this next little run and how it's treated by the algorithms will be interesting.

17331.webp

17330.webp
 
I obviously don't know why Sydney got such a boost from pumping a injury hit Richmond team, but I have done a little digging around the edges around why we've remained relatively low on the power rankings or equivalent of most algorithms.

I find it particularly interesting as I'm still a little sceptical of our ability to perform in September, yet, given our inability to build the experience in what I still consider very different footy.

Taking a look at the Wheelo predictions/simulations, which is just one small example and also output and not input based, but it does suggest a couple of things.
Essentially it is very confident we'll finish high on the ladder, and also rates us as a high chance to reach a prelim, but then a higher chance of crashing out at the prelim stage.

I doubt it or most other models are putting additional emphasis on September results, but it's in the head to head against the top teams that I suspect we're getting discounted.
So this next little run and how it's treated by the algorithms will be interesting.

View attachment 2626804

View attachment 2626803
Aren't we just not rated highly on the statistical models because we don't beat up on poor teams?

Whereas last year the Dogs from memory were consistently rated highly by the Squiggle even though they missed finals.

I'm not sure on Wheelo ratings but I'm certain that is the case for the Squiggle.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I obviously don't know why Sydney got such a boost from pumping a injury hit Richmond team, but I have done a little digging around the edges around why we've remained relatively low on the power rankings or equivalent of most algorithms.

I find it particularly interesting as I'm still a little sceptical of our ability to perform in September, yet, given our inability to build the experience in what I still consider very different footy.

Taking a look at the Wheelo predictions/simulations, which is just one small example and also output and not input based, but it does suggest a couple of things.
Essentially it is very confident we'll finish high on the ladder, and also rates us as a high chance to reach a prelim, but then a higher chance of crashing out at the prelim stage.

I doubt it or most other models are putting additional emphasis on September results, but it's in the head to head against the top teams that I suspect we're getting discounted.
So this next little run and how it's treated by the algorithms will be interesting.

View attachment 2626804

View attachment 2626803
Im guessing the Premiers prediction is weighted so heavily against us because its played 'away'? Cant see any other reason to ha e such a massklive disparity between premiers and runners up
 
Im guessing the Premiers prediction is weighted so heavily against us because its played 'away'? Cant see any other reason to ha e such a massklive disparity between premiers and runners up

Perhaps it weighs the performance at the MCG, we don't have an exceptional run of form there.
 
Yeah, been following our squiggle evaluation this year (which collects all the algorithms), some weird things happen. Hawks went up points a few weeks ago after losing to us, same with their loss to Melbs. Whereas we've won 11 in a row and are still ranked 4th in their seedings.
30019.gif
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom