But Trump knows more about any any elseI think they said "unwittingly" or in Spook Speak, a UI (Useful Idiot)
Or is that not true?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But Trump knows more about any any elseI think they said "unwittingly" or in Spook Speak, a UI (Useful Idiot)
Hmm I suspect concealing sensitive communications would go beyond mere useful idiocy. I suspect we shall know more in the coming weeks as Muller ties up the loose ends before a new AG is sworn in.I think they said "unwittingly" or in Spook Speak, a UI (Useful Idiot)
...
The Dems need someone to fire up their base to come out for them like in 2008. I think Bernie is the only one that can realistically do that.
Classic Trump MagooSurely Trump is not a russian spy
Surely Trump is not a russian spy
I think they said "unwittingly" or in Spook Speak, a UI (Useful Idiot)
This will be on zero consequence other than something to take the air out of trumps sails and force him away from policy.Trump being a “Useful Idiot” is unlikely to be anything of consequence.
Trump would simply retort by tweeting that Muller / SDNY / FBI / whoever are “non-useful idiots” or some such.
Even if Putin himself openly called Trump a “Useful Idiot”, Trump would simply cite it as conclusive evidence that he didn’t collude.
This will be on zero consequence other than something to take the air out of trumps sails and force him away from policy.
Pretty muchSo situation normal then?
Pretty much
Agreed that his first instinct is survival but I don’t think it’s because he is as good, but rather his base of 35% is immovable and the GOP have to back their man given their downside is huge if they tip him out.One thing that everybody can agree on is that Trump’s #1 policy priority is personal political survival. And he’s been pretty damn good at it - surviving (and sometimes thriving) amongst dozens of scandals that would have sunk others.
... except Bernie isn’t a Democrat (He’s an Independent)
Reckon the Democrats will be happy with him switching colours again? There’ll always be rank-and-file Democrats who will see him as an outsider and won’t support him out of principle. Look at how many super-delegates he got in the 2016 Primaries.
He's a Democrat in all but name. He caucuses with them and often votes with them. I don't think actual Dem voters give a **** and I'd suggest the majority of the rank and file members wouldn't either.
The leadership of the party will certainly try and put roadblocks up in front of him but it's going to be much more difficult this time as Bernie has a much bigger profile. Superdelegates now have to vote the way the State voted (they changed the party rules).
The Dems may have no choice but to get behind Bernie or get 4 more years of Trump (similar to how the GOP had to back Trump in the end).
I think all but the furthest right Dems will fall in behind Bernie if he gets the nomination.
Agreed that his first instinct is survival but I don’t think it’s because he is as good, but rather his base of 35% is immovable ...
... and the GOP have to back their man given their downside is huge if they tip him out.
But Trump knows more about any any else
Or is that not true?
Back to waiting for Mueller now... stop it m8s... too funny
But Trump knows more about any any else
Or is that not true?
Bernie will be 79 in 2020. That ship has sailed.
Knows more about technology than anyone, ...
Correct. Just as Dossier vows and declares.Be that as it may, the only way it could result in anything of consequence is if ...
Trump to have been involved with the Russians AND ...
Correct. Except for NRA just as dossier says. (I don't think the NRA angle had become public when dossier was being written up.). On the other hand, Hillary probably wouldn't have wanted a full on with the NRA so it would have been dropped anyway.- Trump to have been doing something very illegal with them such as treason. Unlikely financial crimes (eg: money laundering) or campaign finance crimes (eg: Russia funnelling money to Trump campaign through the NRA) would cut it. AND ...
Correct. Just as dossier vows and declares.,- Illegal activity to have been done with nefarious intent. Unlikely being groomed as a “useful idiot” would cut it. AND ...
AND ...- The US authorities to have incontrovertible evidence of said illegal activity AND said nefarious intent. Just having witness testimony won’t cut it - he can bat them away with aplomb.
AND ...- These details to be made public.
not yet. Not a scintilla.- This to all happen while he is still alive and still in office.
The completely unverified dossier commissioned and paid for by DNC/HRC was a political shakedown of the Opposition Presidential candidate in the 2016 election ... the greater the concoction, the higher the bar.That’s a very high bar to jump over.
Unlikely.
His base are more interested in him building a wall than they are about him colluding with Russia.
One thing that everybody can agree on is that Trump’s #1 policy priority is personal political survival. And he’s been pretty damn good at it - surviving (and sometimes thriving) amongst dozens of scandals that would have sunk others.
Bernie will be 79 in 2020.
I hope that will be the attack line used by the Trump sycophants (that and screaming socialist ofcourse). A recipe for disaster considering the guy Bernie would be up against isn't that much younger.
You can't tell me that Trumpists would give a **** if Trump was 89. They would still vote for him.
The Democratic establishment types will certainly try and run that line as well (they already are).
I don't think people give a ****. He's clearly still in good shape, sharp as a tack, has the energy to constantly campaign. I think in the end they just want someone that represents them.