6-6-6 rule warning farce

juss

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Posts
15,569
Likes
18,984
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
New York Jets
Thread starter #1
I have seen multiple teams in the dying stages break this rule and only be issued with a warning. Since there are absolutely no consequences for getting caught, you may as well roll the dice to try and get away with it, and if you dont, you just get a warning.

Surely this has to be fixed up?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Buzzasto DaSilva

Premiership Player
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Posts
4,183
Likes
6,863
Location
Goonellebah
AFL Club
GWS
Other Teams
Islanders
#2
I have seen multiple teams in the dying stages break this rule and only be issued with a warning. Since there are absolutely no consequences for getting caught, you may as well roll the dice to try and get away with it, and if you dont, you just get a warning.

Surely this has to be fixed up?
I actually like the warning in the initial stage of the season. Common sense move in my opinion. Then maybe take the warning away after the mid-season byes?
 

sr36

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Aug 20, 2009
Posts
10,068
Likes
12,687
Location
Vietnam
AFL Club
Collingwood
#3
I have seen multiple teams in the dying stages break this rule and only be issued with a warning. Since there are absolutely no consequences for getting caught, you may as well roll the dice to try and get away with it, and if you dont, you just get a warning.

Surely this has to be fixed up?
Do you really want to see a game decided a free kick being awarded under this rule?
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2016
Posts
418
Likes
898
AFL Club
Collingwood
#4
The shame of being the 7th person in the 50 is satisfying enough for me. Watching that player running sheepishly out of the 50 is pretty funny and should always be in the highlight reel. How's this for a penalty: The offending player has to do seven 50 metre sprints while everybody else waits. If he does it under 50 seconds he can stay there. Or make him answer a question: What is 7 into 50? If he answers 7.142857143 he can stay there. I'm mocking of course, because that's what the new rule deserves, and because Steve Hocking is a ******* ***** and a ****** **** and a **** ******* ****** ******.
 

juss

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Posts
15,569
Likes
18,984
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
New York Jets
Thread starter #5
Do you really want to see a game decided a free kick being awarded under this rule?
Is it worse than seeing a game potentially decided by a spare man being missed taking an intercept mark to save the game in a breach of the rules?

I dont love the rule to begin with, but if we are going to have it shouldnt it be enforced? Clubs are literally going to roll the dice every close game because they have seen there is no risk and potentially high reward.
 

juss

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Posts
15,569
Likes
18,984
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
New York Jets
Thread starter #6
I actually like the warning in the initial stage of the season. Common sense move in my opinion. Then maybe take the warning away after the mid-season byes?
That would make sense if it was an honest mistake. It's not. Players aren't stupid and it's occurring in the final quarter of close games because players are deliberately trying to exploit the rules knowing there are basically no consequences but potential rewards. Common sense is fine but teams are just taking the piss out of it.
 
Top Bottom