Remove this Banner Ad

Adam Cooney or Brock McLean

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I'd have McLean. As stated Adcock has this year has probably moved ahead of both. Cooney has greater upside obviously but doesn't seem to be producing. He seems doesn't seem to deal with taggers to well. If he can get tougher and stronger this won't be a comparison in a few years.
 
55 Samuel Fisher
61 Michael Rischitelli

I believe these two players have both contributed more consistently to their team this year than the other two flash in the pans mentioned and at significantly lower picks. They may not be the flashiest players, but they do the job.
 
Theres been a hell of a lot of crap written here bout Cooney. Im supposed to believe Cooney isn't half the player of Adcock depsite Adcock having his best season in 07 and still getting less of the ball and far less goals.

Geez an attacking mid kicked mor goals than a defender. Who would have thought? :rolleyes:
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

55 Samuel Fisher
61 Michael Rischitelli

I believe these two players have both contributed more consistently to their team this year than the other two flash in the pans mentioned and at significantly lower picks. They may not be the flashiest players, but they do the job.

Ah I get it now, we are only going by what they have done THIS year - we can forget all the others?

McLean and Cooney have done more over their careers than those two. Sam Fisher had a ripper year THIS year, but McLean and Cooney have him covered,
 
Mclean 2006 >>>> Adcock 2007.

in 2006 in stats Judd and Mclean were the top two for minutes played.

Cooney is a different sort of player but i would take Mclean and Cooney ahead of Adcock.

dont know who is better probably equal.

therefore Mclean = Cooney
 
Adcock better than Cooney... What a joke..

Cooney had an OP affected year in 06 meaning he had a restricted pre-season leading into the 07 season. The track watchers at Whitten Oval hardly sighted Cooney through the pre-season and he only got onto the track with about 4 weeks to go before the season started. By my reckoning he had a pretty good year in 07, but I think he will much better in 08 with a full pre-season under his belt.

At this stage of there career's I would think McLean might be just slightly in front of Cooney. I think this may change over the next 2 or 3 years.
 
Geez an attacking mid kicked mor goals than a defender. Who would have thought? :rolleyes:

Touche :) I know they're different players but what I was trying to point out that Cooney gets a lot of criticism for someone who gets so much of the ball and kicks so many goals and runs with the ball and uses it well. People judge him so much more harshly because he was a number 1 pick but he is a very good player and will only get better.

If people viewed Rischitelli the same way they'd want him delisted
 

Remove this Banner Ad

McLean seems to be injured every year. Good player, though - I really wish we had of taken him ahead of Ray. Imagine Cooney, McLean & Griffen in the same midfield for the next decade. It'd of been quite handy.

IMO Cooney has a greater upside (OP the last two years also) and is by far a genuine match winner. 33 disposals and 5 goals vs. Adelaide 2006 Round 20 a prime example. The last quarter in the game against Brisbane out of the middle that same year was also another.

Cooney just needs to find consistency. He actually found a tougher edge this season and made more tackles than he did previously. It's just a matter of trying to get Cooney to do this far more consistently.

Both The Dogs & Melbourne would be happy with their players and neither would want the other.
 
Cooney is a much better player than Mclean. If Cooney found consistancy every week then he would be one of the best midfielders in the AFL.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Cooney did pretty well this year with no pre season, Mclean would be just behind him in the pecking order of the draft.
 
McLean. Quite easily. But i suppose it depends on what the clubs looking for. At the time we drafted Brock we really needed hard and tough mids. Now it's the other way around. If you take into the fact Cooney was number 1, Brock has been better value.
 
No i think you only want people to reply If they agree with you

Waters and Adcock are both better then Cooney and Mclean

Luke Hodge 2007 stats Vs Cooney 2007, and Hodge is two years old..

And Hodge played 2 more games. not a lot in it.

Hawthorn - 2007OppRdKicksMarksH.BallsDispGoalsBhdH.O.TackFrFFrABMBrisbane Lions1126820 215 Melbourne2125820 112 4 Kangaroos3126719 2 7 2 Geelong419111029 1121Western Bulldogs5133122511 21 Essendon6957161 4 2 Fremantle71791027 2111St Kilda8147519 1 West Coast914492332 3Port Adelaide101356192 1222 Sydney11741017 1213 Carlton1220692941 7313Collingwood13106616 521 Adelaide14139619 1 313 Richmond151169201 6 St Kilda161871129 1123 Kangaroos1715418331117112Essendon181351124 3 312 Brisbane Lions1920613332 14113Port Adelaide20849171 2612 Western Bulldogs21193153462 15 3Sydney221416201 1533 AdelaideFN1361225 262 KangaroosFN3258 27 5 Totals2431913022254123141296294316

Western Bulldogs - 2007OppRdKicksMarksH.BallsDispGoalsBhdH.O.TackFrFFrABMGeelong1156142922 12 2Adelaide21079192 2 St Kilda311331422 22 Richmond410671741 323 Hawthorn5317101 1 West Coast6941120 1 1 Melbourne7949181 811 Collingwood81346194 22 3Sydney992413 14 Carlton1015692423 4121Brisbane Lions111410102412 7 2 Fremantle12125112312 52 Kangaroos13165925 3 1011 Port Adelaide1411515261 53 Essendon1519712313 73 3Geelong1692312 2 2 West Coast1793413 32 St Kilda1817962311 221 Melbourne191881634 3 2 Adelaide20831725 3 1 Hawthorn218513211 621 Kangaroos22177122921 311 Totals222621122074692821 7927199
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Adam Cooney or Brock McLean

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top