I'd stop trying to prove whatever you're trying to prove given the bags essendon have given up in the last month.2 goals, 3 contested marks, 4 marks inside 50, 2 goal assists and 4 coaches votes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Fantasy Footy Notice Image Round 7
SuperCoach Rd 7 SC Talk - Trade Talk - Capt/VC ,//, AFL Fantasy Rd 7 AFF Talk - AF Trades - Capt/VC
I'd stop trying to prove whatever you're trying to prove given the bags essendon have given up in the last month.2 goals, 3 contested marks, 4 marks inside 50, 2 goal assists and 4 coaches votes.
That graph and your comment make no sense to me.
Regardless, like every other stat not all HOs to advantage are equal.
What does my team have anything to do with my point? Nothing? Then why bring it up?I'd stop trying to prove whatever you're trying to prove given the bags essendon have given up in the last month.
Because the argument started over the respective efforts of Hurley and Rance against Hogan...What does my team have anything to do with my point? Nothing? Then why bring it up?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
And Hurley's are much better. Rance conceded more marks inside 50, goals, assists and provided substantially more rebound than Rance. Hurley's game on Hogan virtually won the game. Rance's game on Hogan virtually lost it.Because the argument started over the respective efforts of Hurley and Rance against Hogan...
Good thing you dont base AA off 1 game then, right.And Hurley's are much better. Rance conceded more marks inside 50, goals, assists and provided substantially more rebound than Rance. Hurley's game on Hogan virtually won the game. Rance's game on Hogan virtually lost it.
32% of Naitanui's hitouts are to advantage. 30% of Goldstein's are.
Is that what that graph is supposed to demonstrate? Because it is just confusing.

"Destroyed" 2.1 and 6 marks. Yep, destroyed him. Guess you think Rance is a complete gun if you think kicking 2 goals against him is a brilliant effort.The same 19 year old kid who destroyed Rance...
I think the scale goes:
0 Goals = Rekt
1 Goal = Thrashed
2 Goals = Destroyed
3 Goals = Tempered
4 Goals = Bothered
5 Goals = Ignored
6+ Goals = Reverse Rekt
Rock solid game from Easton Wood.
Exceptional game from Matthew Boyd.
Unbelievable game from Robert Murphy, who almost single handedly won us the game with his rebound off half-back.
Again, all three of these guys are well in contention. Boyd in particular gets underrated here.
Matty Lloyd said today he has never once gone to the footy excited to watch a full back except for this year and Rance.
How was it selective? Tell me what you thought he said.Love how selective people are about quoting Lloyd. One minute they use it to suit their argument, the next he's a flog and they deride anything he says.
and dynamite in the second, which equates to solid, as I highlighted in my post.Wood was completely anonymous in the first half though.
I can definitely get behind this formula.
and dynamite in the second, which equates to solid, as I highlighted in my post.
Not even close. Hasn't even had a nomination yet.Sheed putting a marker down for a wing spot as well
Goldstein and Naitanui beginning to put distance between themselves and Sandilands IMO. Both putting on absolute clinics tonight.
Sandi hasn't even played yet.Goldstein pushing ahead of the pack tonight.
Not even close. Hasn't even had a nomination yet.
By Sheed I mean gaff. My bad