Mega Thread All things Tony Abbott

Who will be the next Prime Minister of Australia

  • Malcolm Turnbull

  • Julie Bishop

  • Scott Morrison

  • Andrew Robb

  • Someone from the LIberal Party other than those above

  • Bill Shorten

  • Someone from the Labor Party other than Shorten


Results are only viewable after voting.

Remove this Banner Ad

She must be good Crow to have you so revved up!


Good isn't the word i'd use.
Disgrace is more apt.


Now we know why the abbott govt responded to ANY criticism the way it did , i used to say he was a petulant campaigner......but it was her.
 
Last edited:
When it suits them.
Lame response rookie RWFW!
Facts are facts...
Bullshit is solely the realm of the right.
Cling to you idiotic medieval beliefs...headlong into extinction.

Cheers.:thumbsu::thumbsu::thumbsu::thumbsu:
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Stop attacking the poster ffs!
ROFL.
I am attacking the dogma...the lie... the right wing mantra.
The poster is deluded if he/she sprouts such bullshit.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

LOL.
#bankingfanboi
How many times have you said banks are more trustworthy than govt/public service/anything not private enterprise?
3 words.
Banking.
Royal.
Commission.

People who fail to understand the role of government share your view.

Private enterprise is filled with ordinary people who wrap processes and procedures around activities to achieve organisational goals. So to does government.

Both however regularly fail, sometimes the failings are minor and sometimes the failings are too big to ignore.

When a private enterprise fails, we have regulatory bodies (most of the government lead) who step in and complete reviews. From these reviews we have findings, recommendations and often penalties.

Where a government organisation fails, who comes in to review? Themselves? I bet you'd be the first person to waive their arms when you hear self-regulated industries!

This separation between operating and governing is as important as the separation of church and state, the judicial arm of government and the legislative government etc etc

Out of interest, do you support a political party that's foundations are union? With one of the most high profile unions, coming out publicly, declaring on the steps of court that they break the law. This is a beautiful example of the dangers of governments, where criminals have infiltrated and control political parties for their own gain. This is why the role of government needs to be limited.
 
People who fail to understand the role of government share your view.

Private enterprise is filled with ordinary people who wrap processes and procedures around activities to achieve organisational goals. So to does government.

Both however regularly fail, sometimes the failings are minor and sometimes the failings are too big to ignore.

When a private enterprise fails, we have regulatory bodies (most of the government lead) who step in and complete reviews. From these reviews we have findings, recommendations and often penalties.

Where a government organisation fails, who comes in to review? Themselves? I bet you'd be the first person to waive their arms when you hear self-regulated industries!

This separation between operating and governing is as important as the separation of church and state, the judicial arm of government and the legislative government etc etc

Out of interest, do you support a political party that's foundations are union? With one of the most high profile unions, coming out publicly, declaring on the steps of court that they break the law. This is a beautiful example of the dangers of governments, where criminals have infiltrated and control political parties for their own gain. This is why the role of government needs to be limited.

And the power of corporations.

Its all about 'balance'. How thats achieved is where the argument is.
 
When governments fail, there's actually a very easy way to hold them accountable. We vote them out. Banks have been unaccountable for decades. I'm also cynical that they will truly be held accountable now or that this will be anything other than a minor bump in their usual activities.
 
When governments fail, there's actually a very easy way to hold them accountable. We vote them out. Banks have been unaccountable for decades. I'm also cynical that they will truly be held accountable now or that this will be anything other than a minor bump in their usual activities.

Unfortunately no

Governments come and go but the citizens wear the consequences long after they are gone.

The number of busted arse nations on the planet attests to the price of poor government


In fact you’d say it’s a death spiral. Poor government leads to higher levels of poverty and desperation. Desperate people vote for short termism. Shortermism leads to poverty. Trump would be an example of this on the right and criminal unions would be an example on the left.
 
Unfortunately no

Governments come and go but the citizens wear the consequences long after they are gone.

The number of busted arse nations on the planet attests to the price of poor government


In fact you’d say it’s a death spiral. Poor government leads to higher levels of poverty and desperation. Desperate people vote for short termism. Shortermism leads to poverty. Trump would be an example of this on the right and criminal unions would be an example on the left.

So who would do the most damage, the sum total of criminal unions, or the mass of local & international corporates?
 
Tony Abbott calling for compulsory acquisition of private enterprise assets by the state. What a ******* commie.

Abbott has no guiding political ideology beyond keeping himself in the fashion to which he has become accustomed.

(That includes maintaining social mores as he prefers them).

He's no actual classical Liberal.
 
Back
Top