are the poms cheating ?

[King Elvis]

I don't have a problem with the fielding stuff. Nor do I have a problem with the not walking stuff. After all, we started it. But what I do have a problem with is when you're out, you're out. Are Australia going to have to keep clean bowling Ian Bell to get him out?

I'm the opposite.

No problem with a player not talking.

 

[Chops18]

If Australia did the same thing no one would bat a eyelid. I love my country but we are sore losers.

Sent from my LG-E400f using Tapatalk 2

 

[Mateyman]

If Australia did the same thing no one would bat a eyelid. I love my country but we are sore losers.

Sent from my LG-E400f using Tapatalk 2

lol. You think nobody in England would bat an eyelid. OK, carry on.

Anyway, back in reality, we all heard the British commentators continue to bemoan the CORRECT decision for Agar during his 98 for hours and days after the incident

 

[PrideOf]

Anyway, back in reality, we all heard the British commentators continue to bemoan the CORRECT decision for Agar during his 98 for hours and days after the incident

Just about had enough of the English commentators, bar Bumble. More chips on shoulders in the commentary box than when Derwayne Russell works at Crows games.

One of the best parts of this Test and us piling on the runs is hearing Strauss, Atherton, Botham and Montgomery Burns dropping the smug prick act.

 

[PrideOf]

Got to love this thread. Whenever England are winning, it's 'they're cheating', 'disgraceful what England are doing', 'the poms have doctored the pitch', 'they've paid the umpires' and 'the poms have added noises to the replays on the reviews'.
Please carry on. It's making me laugh how you lot are coming across.

No, you've been cheating for a while, it's just now it's paying off.

 

[Chops18]

lol. You think nobody in England would bat an eyelid. OK, carry on.

Anyway, back in reality, we all heard the British commentators continue to bemoan the CORRECT decision for Agar during his 98 for hours and days after the incident

No they probably would but would anyone over here bat a eyelid ? No they wouldn't.

Nothing in the rule book saying what they're doing is wrong.

Sent from my LG-E400f using Tapatalk 2

 

[Mateyman]

No they probably would but would anyone over here bat a eyelid ? No they wouldn't.

Nothing in the rule book saying what they're doing is wrong.

Sent from my LG-E400f using Tapatalk 2

I don't give a shit what the rule book says. They are clearly playing outside the spirit of cricket. I would say the same whoever it was. When you say "we" are sore losers, I can only assume then that you mean the whole world is.

 

[Donnie Darko]

Thread dated from 2005!!
where the hell did this come from?

 

[ep2018]

Thread dated from 2005!!
where the hell did this come from?

Cheating did them a hell of a lot of good in 2005!

 

[The Passenger]

not a fan of this rain they have conjured up. pretty ordinary form from them imo.

 

[Lunchlady Doris]

I'm not angry, just disappointed.

Batting at 2 an over starting on the second day, when in the field what Prior called 'over rate management', their slowing and delaying tactics are just pathetic, and what is killing test cricket.

You're 2-0 up fellas, just play the game in the spirit it's meant to be played.