Remove this Banner Ad

Bluemour Discussion Thread VI (cont. in Part VII)

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

In a premiership side I'd suggest it's probably easier to kick goals as a forward. Stringer would blow a gasket the way our midfield delivers the ball.

No doubt and I'm not suggesting he'd produce those sort of numbers at Carlton in 2018.

I think his 'shit' 2016 has been blown way out of proportion and has been exacerbated by a bad 2017 season.
 
Are you forgetting that he plays for the reigning premiers?

No, but I think you missed my point.

I'd also like to mention he's a total dickhead.

I've already said we should steer clear if there are any doubts over his personality. It's very easy to judge from the outside.
 
No doubt and I'm not suggesting he'd produce those sort of numbers at Carlton in 2018.

I think his 'shit' 2016 has been blown way out of proportion and has been exacerbated by a bad 2017 season.
He's an inconsistent on-field performer with off-field issues who would cost plenty both in terms of salary and trade.

Why is he the type we should look to bring in at this stage of our rebuild?
 
He's an inconsistent on-field performer with off-field issues who would cost plenty both in terms of salary and trade.

Why is he the type we should look to bring in at this stage of our rebuild?

All depends on price doesn't it?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Stringer lost his way in the second half of 2016 but still managed to produce 40+ goals.

I'd love all our players to be that shit.

Clearly The Dogs have better standards then, if they're keen on moving him on.

Maybe a change of scenery will do the trick and maybe it won't. We should kick the tyres, by all means though.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Um, what?

Silvagni, as a medium forward in the worst forward line in the competition, averaged one goal a match, and almost a point to go with it; points that, if you've watched most weeks, were from set shots he really should have kicked.

Strictly my former basketball scout opinion here... Jack, unfortunately, lacks two things pivotal to becoming a high quality player at the AFL level. One of those things is correctable and the other much less so. The correctable thing is that he is simply not strong enough. You can gain strength. This usually comes at a cost of a slight decrease in speed. The problem here is that Jack, for his size, is not fast. In fact, I'd suggest that he's already slower than average. Yes, you can increase your speed slightly but you're either born with it or you're not. Jack wasn't born with it. At 191cm he's not tall enough to be a KPF and so his speed deficiency will always count against him.

The skill issue plaguing him right now is that his kicking is substandard. He misses too many gettable shots. I'm willing to mark this down as a lack of confidence that can be improved upon. When he first arrived to the club he was a beautiful user of the ball compared to his age. This was one of the trademarks that gave me confidence that he'd become a player despite his physical weaknesses.

From a performance perspective, there have been multiple times where his performances haven't been anywhere close to the standard required. When he has a poor game you're playing a man down. Young players are inconsistent enough as it is and that's an acceptable part of growing pains but if most players (including youngsters) are having an off game they find a way to do something that contributes to the overall team performance. Jack goes missing to the point where a search rescue team couldn't find him.

The problem that some fans have, and I'll include myself here, is that all of our young kids have had to really earn the games that they've played. I don't see anyone being gifted games except you can accuse the MC of gifting Jack games. When we were crying out for a key forward to get a game it took three quarters of the season before they gave Harry McKay (or Pat Kerr) an opportunity in the team. I've seen more promising signs from Harry in his two games than I had in most of Jack's. A legitimate case can be made that Jack was given opportunity after opportunity when other young players were languishing in the VFL.

When McKay was finally given his opportunity which player was it that was forced to move to an unnatural position? Jack. Consequentially, there's evidence that the coaching staff hold similar lines of thought.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top