- May 5, 2006
- 65,568
- 74,687
- AFL Club
- West Coast
we won't get anything for Starcevich going via free agency - how it was always going to end up.
So the net effect of Starcevich leaving as a free agent vs going into the PSD would be zero.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty AFLW Notice Img
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
we won't get anything for Starcevich going via free agency - how it was always going to end up.
Source?It's in both teams interest to get this done. Make no mistake Brisbane are the ones being difficult. Holding out on the oscar free agency is the feather in the cap move
Well that's a nonsense. WCE have a vested interest in what Brisbane are offering Allen... if you think they cant influence that then your not being serious.Only Brisbane and the AFL can do that. WC have no say in a contract offer Allen signs with another club.
Five late second round picks is worth about 1600 points. I believe the number of picks matching number of available list spots only comes in next year surprise surprise.
Anyway if you want to burn through your 2026 Rd 1 pick also go for it. Has nothing to do with WC or Starcevich.
So the net effect of Starcevich leaving as a free agent vs going into the PSD would be zero.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Any club needing a key forward, that has room in the cap would take Allen, before he got to our pick.Can’t take Starce and Allen with pick 1 in the PSD. Lions could play the same game. No one will touch Allen, the rest of the league would be more happy with that outcome as no compo pick diluting the draft. WCE losing out on pick 2 would be all time hahaha
Refusing to lodge the paperwork for oscar. Pure pettiness
Dan Annable is an academy player tied to us in this years draft (he's rated around pick 5). We can use multiple late picks to match a bid. We also get a 10% discount on whatever bid is used.
Yep because you won’t match our offer for him, which is why it’s in your best interests to make sure Allen hits band 1Sure, you'll be trading Allen with some other club at that point. We'll be out of picture as we won't have the currency to trade.
Starcevich became a factor only due to Allen free agency potentially triggering pick 2 for you. If Allen's out of picture then we won't get anything for Starcevich going via free agency - how it was always going to end up.
Brisbane are the ones not being reasonable at the moment. Will need to come to table by lodging the Allen free agencyThe Clubs will likely work something reasonably fair out in the end
If the deal gets done fine, but both clubs are running some risks with respective players.
However, because of the risks i would not care if both stayed where they are or found another club but that's unlikely
The Lions took a risk on Tom Doedee (2023 trade) on a good contract and to date has played just 1 AFL game due to injuries.
Yep because you won’t match our offer for him, which is why it’s in your best interests to make sure Allen hits band 1
Refusing to lodge the paperwork for oscar. Pure pettiness
He’s referring to a match of Starce.You have it the wrong way around regarding contract.
Below from the "Players Association"
View attachment 2448029
Possibly but uptheWC was replying to a post regarding Allen that did also mention StarcevichHe’s referring to a match of Starce.
Yeah I was referring to our offer for Starcevich. With the Allen/Starce situations similar we might need to be clearer going forward lol.Possibly but uptheWC was replying to a post regarding Allen that did also mention Starcevich
Apologies if i mis read that post and the context that may have preceded it.
Both Allen and Starcevich are restricted free agents, so the process is the same for both.
Just a matter of when lodgments are made within the timeframes mentioned.
So, 24 hours is the first timeframe after reaching a signed agreement.
It would not surprise me that both contracts are made up but not signed until the Starcevich trade is agreed upon.
That's the way i see it anyhow. WC supporters may see it differently
Any club needing a key forward, that has room in the cap would take Allen, before he got to our pick.
I believe you underestimate other clubs not placing their self interest first. Melbourne, Essendon and Sydney would definitely take Allen before he go to our pick in the psd.
Carlton had the third pick and Martin was not held in anywhere near as high regard as Allen at the time.I respect, but reject your opinion. And to speak in absolutes (stating those clubs would definitely take him) about things you have no real knowledge of overestimates your own beliefs.
The most recent example of what was, at the time, a highly touted talent would suggest a fair amount of inaccuracy with what you are asserting.
![]()
Carlton selects Jack Martin in the Pre-Season Draft, ending months of speculation
Trade negotiations collapsed in October. But now the wait is finally over for Jack Martinwww.foxsports.com.au
You keep throwing out assumptions, and that's all they are even though you seem to have convinced yourself that is what is happeningBrisbane are the ones not being reasonable at the moment. Will need to come to table by lodging the Allen free agency
And Suns held a pick before them. So what? It happens in the draft all the time where kids refuse to travel.Carlton had the third pick and Martin was not held in anywhere near as high regard as Allen at the time.
What a pointless comparison.
Pretty sure Carlton traded with Suns in the national draft to make sure they wouldn’t pick him up early. He just had to go one pick more to make it to Carlton. Nowhere near as big of a gamble as hoping OA slips to pick 18.And Suns held a pick before them. So what? It happens in the draft all the time where kids refuse to travel.
Even bigger risk to take on a contract size the one of Allen’s for him to be unhappy at your club. Wouldn’t happen, particularly with recent actions of high profile players on big money being disillusioned at their clubs.
Rocks in your head if you think a club is taking on 6 x 900k contract for player they have done minimal background on and wants to play elsewhere
Both Allen and Starcevich are restricted free agents, so the process is the same for both.
Just a matter of when lodgments are made within the timeframes mentioned.
So, 24 hours is the first timeframe after reaching a signed agreement.
It would not surprise me that both contracts are made up but not signed until the Starcevich trade is agreed upon.
That's the way i see it anyhow. WC supporters may see it differently
I don’t know if you watched the 6 or so minute extended clip from Matt Clarke our list boss today. He made it clear we aren’t considering Starc through FA, only via trade. Should the deadline lapse and say, no OA bid was lodged / be matched, we’d still be able to offer a trade or opt to cut ties and leave the ball in the Starcevich corner .Possibly but uptheWC was replying to a post regarding Allen that did also mention Starcevich
Apologies if i mis read that post and the context that may have preceded it.
Both Allen and Starcevich are restricted free agents, so the process is the same for both.
Just a matter of when lodgments are made within the timeframes mentioned.
So, 24 hours is the first timeframe after reaching a signed agreement.
It would not surprise me that both contracts are made up but not signed until the Starcevich trade is agreed upon.
That's the way i see it anyhow. WC supporters may see it differently