Remove this Banner Ad

Opinion Cam Guthrie - out of form? (and tangential Supercoach as guide to form discussion)

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

In your opinion what's a pass mark for a typical Guthrie game? What would satisfy you in terms of output?

I expect consistency. I expect that if he plays as a regular mid, he's not ranked 89th in the league for contested possessions and 94th for clearancess. I believe these are the two most crucial stats to come out of the midfield, he's poor at both. Very poor. If not, a much higher than average (for a mid) amount of metres gained, inside 50s, tackles, hitting a lot of forward leads... in general very effective with the ball. I'd say he's behind Motlop and Duncan in this regard.

If you want me to give you exact stat expectations, that's ridiculous.
 
I've spelled it out many times, feel free to peruse my posts. It's all there, stats, everything.

I'd say that the way he conducts himself is feminine. The hair, the time spent on his looks in general, his socks, boots, lack of intent, lack of hardness, lack of physicality, etc.

BTW bud, it's a footy forum. Save the social justice warrior / Waleed Aly tripe. ;)
Ha ha ha ha ha

Now I think guthries impact is down.
And I'd prefer him down back.

But that post is pure caveman type stuff.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

It's hard to take you serious when you've indicated that supercoach price is a valid measure of a players output... no offence.

Way to purposely ignore the context of my post then try and belittle it... So, so, typical.

I never said stats are king but Supercoach value is based on a player's Champion Data stats over time. You probably don't realise how much time and effort goes into rating a players' effectiveness in a game but it's the single most accurate way to rate a player statistically. Maybe that's why coaches watch them like a hawk during a game...
 
Last edited:
Way to purposely ignore the context of my post then try and belittle it... So, so, typical.

I never said stats are king but Supercoach value is based on a player's champion data scores over time. You probably don't realise how much time and effort goes into rating a players' effectiveness in a game but it's the single most accurate way to rate a player statistically. Maybe that's why coaches watch them like a hawk during a game...
Oh what a load of rubbish.
Get a life.
 
Way to purposely ignore the context of my post then try and belittle it... So, so, typical.

I never said stats are king but Supercoach value is based on a player's champion data scores over time. You probably don't realise how much time and effort goes into rating a players' effectiveness in a game but it's the single most accurate way to rate a player statistically. Maybe that's why coaches watch them like a hawk during a game...

So just to clarify, you're saying that AFL coaches use supercoach scores during games
 
So just to clarify, you're saying that AFL coaches use supercoach scores during games

No, they use 'Champion Data' stats, the same stats that are used to calculate a supercoach score.. It's really not that hard.
 
So just to clarify, you're saying that AFL coaches use supercoach scores during games

Seriously, if you're all questioning this so heavily regarding Guthrie.. go find the games where he got coaches votes and compare his champion data / SC scores in those games to his last 6, where he's clearly (to anyone with a clue) been underperforming.

Again, it's really not that hard.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

I've spelled it out many times, feel free to peruse my posts. It's all there, stats, everything.

I'd say that the way he conducts himself is feminine. The hair, the time spent on his looks in general, his socks, boots, lack of intent, lack of hardness, lack of physicality, etc.

BTW bud, it's a footy forum. Save the social justice warrior / Waleed Aly tripe. ;)

I dont get what your logic is... the way one is manicured affects the way one plays? Id guess a high percentage of the young blokes playing these days are "metrosexual" types , so what .. Don Scott used to have a handbag..played like he had bricks in it. Put as much gel in the hair as they like as long as it doesn't make him run slow.

... and really just like a golfer that starts missing putts... has the putter changed? I have seen no recent change to what he has always been like.

Surely the grooming of someone has little to do with their hardness .. let alone the feminine comparison. Watch the Netball GF..and female has little to do with a lack of physicality. My bet would be in the next couple of weeks there will be females over in Brazil that would make me and many men look soft.
And as CE said , the recent expansion of the game means that that type of comment has seen its day as being derogatory. There would be some women that will play next year that Id be certainly happy to play like.

Make a case for him to be dropped on performance if you deem it , but deportment ? Gender? Surely you can do better than this Patrick.
 
I dont get what your logic is... the way one is manicured affects the way one plays? Id guess a high percentage of the young blokes playing these days are "metrosexual" types , so what .. Don Scott used to have a handbag..played like he had bricks in it. Put as much gel in the hair as they like as long as it doesn't make him run slow.

... and really just like a golfer that starts missing putts... has the putter changed? I have seen no recent change to what he has always been like.

Surely the grooming of someone has little to do with their hardness .. let alone the feminine comparison. Watch the Netball GF..and female has little to do with a lack of physicality. My bet would be in the next couple of weeks there will be females over in Brazil that would make me and many men look soft.
And as CE said , the recent expansion of the game means that that type of comment has seen its day as being derogatory. There would be some women that will play next year that Id be certainly happy to play like.

Make a case for him to be dropped on performance if you deem it , but deportment ? Gender? Surely you can do better than this Patrick.

Nice post, it's a shame you devoted the time to something I thought might simply poke some fun at some of Guthrie's special 'fans' :rainbow: on here.

Guess what, life is just a little more enjoyable if not taken so serious. ;)
 
So just to clarify, you're saying that AFL coaches use supercoach scores during games

Got it - so Luke Beveridge obviously had Stanley in his SuperCoach team which is why he refused to play with any defensive pressure against him.

While Scott has obviously spent the year trying to work out ways to get Motlop, Hawkins and now Guthrie into his side, which is why he has tweaked with their mat h instructions and then continued to play them through lean spells until his could afford to bring them into his team.
 
Everything started going wrong when he quit Cold Rock. He had the entire world beneath his feet but his ego just got too big. He stopped giving back to the community and abandoned his fellow man when they needed that sweet cone the most. His selfishness has brought on this divine punishment and the only way to absolve his sins is to reclaim the scoop that was broken and to humble himself before the masses. It is time for him to put aside the footballer and become who he was born to be. The deliver of dessert, the tamer of treats and the savant of smoothies. Only them will he truly know himself and will gain the courage he needs to fend off without fear, to kick the ball straight and true, and to move out of the shadows of lesser men and lead us to victory.
 
I think Guthrie has to play when we get Caddy back. It could be something as simple as Caddy and he having an understanding of their roles around the contest when they're both there. I think dropping Guthrie when we bring Caddy back in would be a mistake. We need both of them in there and our midfield unit working as just that, a unit, together as a team. Caddy is more important to our structure, I think, than given credit for.
Good point. Danger, Caddy, Guthrie and Selwood have synergy. This in turn helps Mots, Duncan and Bartel perform in their ideal roles. I wonder if Menegola and Selwood can fit in.
 
Way to purposely ignore the context of my post then try and belittle it... So, so, typical.

I never said stats are king but Supercoach value is based on a player's Champion Data stats over time. You probably don't realise how much time and effort goes into rating a players' effectiveness in a game but it's the single most accurate way to rate a player statistically. Maybe that's why coaches watch them like a hawk during a game...
I'm not entirely sure I'm living in reality... I'll jump off a bridge and make sure.

Be right back.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Everything started going wrong when he quit Cold Rock. He had the entire world beneath his feet but his ego just got too big. He stopped giving back to the community and abandoned his fellow man when they needed that sweet cone the most. His selfishness has brought on this divine punishment and the only way to absolve his sins is to reclaim the scoop that was broken and to humble himself before the masses. It is time for him to put aside the footballer and become who he was born to be. The deliver of dessert, the tamer of treats and the savant of smoothies. Only them will he truly know himself and will gain the courage he needs to fend off without fear, to kick the ball straight and true, and to move out of the shadows of lesser men and lead us to victory.
LOL The savant of Smoothies... put that in hashtag thinginy bob
 
Out of insults?
giphy.gif
 
So just to clarify, you're saying that AFL coaches use supercoach scores during games
of course they do.

Scott: My opponent needs 20pts to beat me. Has Danger, Ruggles and Mots.
Scott: (on phone) hey Laps
Lappin: Yes Scotty
Scott: Danger, Rug and Mots benched
Lappin: How long? 3 minutes?
Scott: No. Rest of the game.
 
Seriously, if you're all questioning this so heavily regarding Guthrie.. go find the games where he got coaches votes and compare his champion data / SC scores in those games to his last 6, where he's clearly (to anyone with a clue) been underperforming.

Again, it's really not that hard.
Correlation does not equal causation.
 
I dont get what your logic is... the way one is manicured affects the way one plays? Id guess a high percentage of the young blokes playing these days are "metrosexual" types , so what .. Don Scott used to have a handbag..played like he had bricks in it. Put as much gel in the hair as they like as long as it doesn't make him run slow.

... and really just like a golfer that starts missing putts... has the putter changed? I have seen no recent change to what he has always been like.

Surely the grooming of someone has little to do with their hardness .. let alone the feminine comparison. Watch the Netball GF..and female has little to do with a lack of physicality. My bet would be in the next couple of weeks there will be females over in Brazil that would make me and many men look soft.
And as CE said , the recent expansion of the game means that that type of comment has seen its day as being derogatory. There would be some women that will play next year that Id be certainly happy to play like.

Make a case for him to be dropped on performance if you deem it , but deportment ? Gender? Surely you can do better than this Patrick.
Yes spot on. Unnecessary, and I am no metro whatever.

However I would add that there will be many females in Rio in the next few weeks that will make many look hard.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Opinion Cam Guthrie - out of form? (and tangential Supercoach as guide to form discussion)

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top