- Jun 28, 2013
- 33,616
- 52,632
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Wingerz > ShielIn case anyone's wondering the answer is still no.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Wingerz > ShielIn case anyone's wondering the answer is still no.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Well certain Geelong/Essendon supporters seem to follow his every wordThere should be a religion based upon Clarko’s wise words
A 10 goal win is a 10 goal once all is said and done though.![]()
A 10 goal win is a 10 goal once all is said and done though.![]()
Lloyd was right. Hawthorn will keep winning games like tonight but ultimately just end up a middle of the road side going nowhere fast.
Beating Richmond seems good as they are the reigning premier but they were horrible.
Did Clarkson mention that or only use that excuse for his side getting smacked last week?
If the Hawks win a flag in the next three or four years I will bow down and kiss Clarko's feet and beg for forgiveness.
Uranus, where Clarko’s head seems to be in recent times.Would've taken full responsibility for the loss internally. What planet are you on?
Uranus, where Clarko’s head seems to be in recent times.

Not wanting to get sucked into a two part thread. But, from my understanding the title is misleading?
scully - pick 1
Patton - pick 1
JOM - pick 1 of mini draft
Wingard - pick 6
Scrimshaw - pick 7
McEvoy - pick 9
Frawley - pick 12
Mitchell - F/S pick 21 would have gone a lot lot higher in his draft year If not for f/s rules.
That’s 8 of their 22 that come from the top end of the draft.
they just traded in rather than picked as kids.
The only negative comments on my post list are about Sir Clarkson the Messiah, so this means it must be a trolling second account?Why don’t you use your real account?![]()
wtfNot wanting to get sucked into a two part thread. But, from my understanding the title is misleading?
scully - pick 1
Patton - pick 1
JOM - pick 1 of mini draft
Wingard - pick 6
Scrimshaw - pick 7
McEvoy - pick 9
Frawley - pick 12
Mitchell - F/S pick 21 would have gone a lot lot higher in his draft year If not for f/s rules.
That’s 8 of their 22 that come from the top end of the draft.
they just traded in rather than picked as kids.
Not wanting to get sucked into a two part thread. But, from my understanding the title is misleading?
scully - pick 1
Patton - pick 1
JOM - pick 1 of mini draft
Wingard - pick 6
Scrimshaw - pick 7
McEvoy - pick 9
Frawley - pick 12
Mitchell - F/S pick 21 would have gone a lot lot higher in his draft year If not for f/s rules.
That’s 8 of their 22 that come from the top end of the draft.
they just traded in rather than picked as kids.
only when it mattersA 10 goal win is a 10 goal once all is said and done though.![]()
Did last night matter at all?only when it matters

If you are going to get the cup this year you probably need to know how to beat the Tiges, Eagles or GWS at the GDid last night matter at all?![]()
We were responsible for eliminating the Eagles from finals last year at the MCG...Whoops!If you are going to get the cup this year you probably need to know how to beat the Tiges, Eagles or GWS at the G

If the Hawks win a flag in the next three or four years I will bow down and kiss Clarko's feet and beg for forgiveness.
Yeah I was thinking that the words you have quoted were curiously devoid of logicHuh? Saying the other team "weren't that good" to dish out a 10 goal thrashing is to suggest it was his own team that were terrible. That IS taking responsibility. It was his way of saying last week was our fault.
He said we were shit basically. This is not terribly contentious104 TACKLES!!!!
Clarko always takes responsibility
Except HawthornIn your posts you're constantly asserting that, unless the Hawks win a flag, the recruitment strategy has been proven to be poor. Is that right?
Why don't we hold every team that tries to rebuild through the draft accountable to the same measures? If it fails, why isn't that chalked up as a point against the merits of drafting your talent?
If you look through history, for the life of the league while most or all of the talent has been drafted in, there are plenty more failures on the part of drafting to win premierships than there is in trading to win them.