WWSD
Premium Platinum
- Sep 7, 2009
- 24,285
- 55,003
Helped you win 4 flags mate
More than half of the Hawthorn premiership players under Clarkson were not first round picks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Helped you win 4 flags mate
More than half of the Hawthorn premiership players under Clarkson were not first round picks.
name me a premiership team that is diff to your premiership list in terms of core players being high draft picks. Richmond had a core of elite draft picks and surrounded by rookies/lower picks houli lambert. Take out dustin cotchin jack and lynch and prestia high draft picks they don’t win. Same for your team. Take out hodge roughie lewis cyril buddy you don’t win.More than half of the Hawthorn premiership players under Clarkson were not first round picks.
Like every premiership side of all time.
If the draft is the bases for winning a Premiership, then how come that strategy still hasn’t worked out for Carlton, Essendon, Melbourne, St Kilda etc?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Why break the bank for JOM and Wingarf then?I maintain what I said a couple of years ago.
The recruiting of several older players wasn't to win a flag, but to put some sort of leadership in place to develop the next round of young players.
Everyone likes to point out Hawthorns success in the draft early in Clarkson tenure, but ignore that we had the likes of Smith, Dixon, Vandenberg, barker, even Crawford there who transitioned as the club climbed up.
This team is currently at the 2003/2004 structure, and in the next couple of years will hit the draft heavily
name me a premiership team that is diff to your premiership list in terms of core players being high draft picks. Richmond had a core of elite draft picks and surrounded by rookies/lower picks houli lambert. Take out dustin cotchin jack and lynch and prestia high draft picks they don’t win. Same for your team. Take out hodge roughie lewis cyril buddy you don’t win.
You need elite talent you either hit the draft or trade for them. Unfortunately currency to trade is limited for the Hawks.
Now clarko/professional organisation is no doubt the reason you guys won 4 but if you think you can win a premiership without a core of elite talent you have to be kidding me.
carlton had draft picks but we screwed up the picks/ our culture/ the way our club was run so only having draft picks won’t work.
you have clarko ffs just get some early draft picks trade for some and you are back.
For anyone that thinks the hawks will contend with the current list with a few trades/ limited early draft picks there is no chance.
hodge cyril buddy and even Mitchell generational players.you guys hit the jackpot. Hard to replicate that again.
Because for the most part, multiple premiership players lose that drive. We have seen that the past couple of yrs. Really the only premiership players of ours that have maintained any sort of standard to look up to are frawley and burgoyne.Why break the bank for JOM and Wingarf then?
Surely the leadership would be better coming from existing, older, 3 times premiership players.
On moto g(7) using BigFooty.com mobile app
nit picky but buddy did take himself out
funny thing is bigfooty is opinion based, but I never once saw (non hawthorn fans who take a keen interest in hawthorn) describe those players as ‘generational’ when they were in their prime.
which is why I don’t really rate current opinions either
Im pretty sure people were talking about cyril and buddy in their prime as generational, but really you only once you see a full body of work can you call a player generational. Ablett really didn’t cement his greatness until he went to the cats and proved he was one of the best to play the game. Your first flag doesn’t happen without buddy.nit picky but buddy did take himself out
funny thing is bigfooty is opinion based, but I never once saw (non hawthorn fans who take a keen interest in hawthorn) describe those players as ‘generational’ when they were in their prime.
which is why I don’t really rate current opinions either
Most people still say Cyril never won enough of the footy. Will always be a question mark over his greatness.Im pretty sure people were talking about cyril and buddy in their prime as generational, but really you only once you see a full body of work can you call a player generational. Ablett really didn’t cement his greatness until he went to the cats and proved he was one of the best to play the game. Your first flag doesn’t happen without buddy.
Hard to go past him as an impact player. In his position and role he was generational. My point is was taken early in the draft. Hit The draft hawksMost people still say Cyril never won enough of the footy. Will always be a question mark over his greatness.
I say 4 medals and a Norm say otherwise. And that's not taking into account his highlight reel and the fear of God he put into opposition players when in possession. His perceived pressure was off the charts. Past players are now starting to say it. They'd sh*t themselves when he was in the area.
A generational talent. Yes. But without the 30 odd touches to boot, from stat padding. Never had the tank to play full time midfield. But also never had the patience to rack up meaningless touches in the back half. He just wanted to impact and win games of footy. And flags. Which he did in spades.
Hawthorn royalty.
Most agree would agree nowHard to go past him as an impact player. In his position and role he was generational. My point is was taken early in the draft. Hit The draft hawks

What this thread conveniently ignores is the fact that even if you agree the Hawks should hit the draft, we haven't actually qualified for picks in top dozen since before 2010.
The one year we did, pick 7 in 2017, came as a shock, and we had already traded our pick for JOM.
The next lowest pick, #13 in 2019, we used on Will Day.
The unspoken subtext to this thread is the suggestion that we should have traded out our stars for picks and spent a few years on the bottom of the ladder.
But nobody is actually saying that on here.
Hawks have remained in mid table mediocrity because Clarkson has deluded himself into thinking that he could squeeze another premiership out of the list.
Suggest you go back 40-50 pages and plenty of people were calling it
I’d still be happy if I was a Hawks fan because the 3 peat was phenomenal, but the failure to act earlier is going to set the recovery back a few years yet
Yeah, exactly what i said. Please describe what "Act earlier" means. We know it is code for modern day tanking.
Sorry I just edited post
The recruitment of Scully and Patten was a complete waste of time even though their draft cost was relatively minor. Neither will play in your next premiership
Hitting the draft and playing kids instead of those 2 isn’t tanking, it’s just good list management
Patton - maybe.
You can't say that about Scully. People like Kane Cornes and other oppos supporters wanted an inquiry about how we got him.
Yeah, exactly what i said. Please describe what "Act earlier" means. We know it is code for modern day tanking.
Patton - maybe.
You can't say that about Scully. People like Kane Cornes and other oppos supporters wanted an inquiry about how we got him.
Scully has never been anything more than a b grader and never will be, particularly in a bottom 6 team.
You got him cheap because of his ankle injury
Sorry I just edited post
The recruitment of Scully and Patten was a complete waste of time even though their draft cost was relatively minor. Neither will play in your next premiership
Hitting the draft and playing kids instead of those 2 isn’t tanking, it’s just good list management
The landscape is constantly changing. Lists will be reduced, that’s the new surge tide
You forget the reaction when we got him. And we just finished top 4 when we got him.
It is not like Hawk supporters don't understand why people are saying what they say on this thread. Like me, I think the issue we have is HOW people say it.
Please tell us to trade out our stars. Please tell us to bottom out. But people don't say that. People simply criticize how we played our very very very poor draft hand on the back of Clarkson's elite coaching. We never had access to high draft picks.
Perhaps we should have cut our list down, traded out, and stunk. I think we should have. But people don't say that. They want to criticize without any dirt on their own hands.
To be honest that top 4 finish was pretty amazing with the list you had and shows how good Clarko is, but in the long run it was probably a bad thing