Hahaha, I liked this![]()
Or maybe 1/16th Ablett.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Hahaha, I liked this![]()
Says the guy who supports a team that still haven’t won a final in 15 years.
Maybe its just the boards I've seen but there is a distinct difference with the Hawthorn board and others with you guys thinking you can get a whole heap of elite talent that's basically impossible to bring in short of trading a valuable player or two. I suppose you did trade Burton so there's every chance you would trade a Worpel.No different to other clubs who are linked to plenty of players.
Freo not included, of course.
Sack Worsfold?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Aren't they RFA's? You think GWS will go yep sure take them hahaha
Coniglio is a FA.
Whitfield is a FA next year.
Yeah, Hawthorn are tracking well. Bottom 8 with one of the oldest teams to ever play AFL.
Just browsing stats noted here. https://afltables.com/afl/stats/alltime/misc_players.html#11
Hawks 2015 grand final not only the oldest premiership team ever, but also the greatest total games played ever in a single game 3670. Well ahead of the other teams in the list
Aren't they RFA's? You think GWS will go yep sure take them hahaha

I remember when Hawthorn were no chance of being able to bring in O’Meara and Mitchell in the same period.Maybe its just the boards I've seen but there is a distinct difference with the Hawthorn board and others with you guys thinking you can get a whole heap of elite talent that's basically impossible to bring in short of trading a valuable player or two. I suppose you did trade Burton so there's every chance you would trade a Worpel.
That's exactly what their supporters believe.Aren't they RFA's? You think GWS will go yep sure take them hahaha
I remember when Hawthorn were no chance of being able to bring in O’Meara and Mitchell in the same period.
“You’ll have to choose one or the other! You won’t get both!”
Helps that both were uncontracted and Sydney need to shed cap space. That’s not the case with Whitfield and Hill and while you guys think GWS are going to let Coniglio walk for pick 15, the rest of us interpret the words differently.I remember when Hawthorn were no chance of being able to bring in O’Meara and Mitchell in the same period.
“You’ll have to choose one or the other! You won’t get both!”
You got both and what happened?I remember when Hawthorn were no chance of being able to bring in O’Meara and Mitchell in the same period.
“You’ll have to choose one or the other! You won’t get both!”
Do you understand how RFA works? haha
Try?Are rated so financial they donate soft taxes to prop up the rest of the competition
Pokies arent great socially but if thats unsustainable, so is the victorian govt who reels in substantial amounts of cash
Nice try
How do Hawthorn plan on satisfying GWS with trades for Cogs and Whitfield (who I believe they are after as well)
Both are worth two low 1st round picks each with Whitfield probably being worth more than that he is probably the most in form player in the comp
yep awesome, and yet still, you are 12thI remember when Hawthorn were no chance of being able to bring in O’Meara and Mitchell in the same period.
“You’ll have to choose one or the other! You won’t get both!”
We made top 4.You got both and what happened?
Relevance to the discussion? Zero.yep awesome, and yet still, you are 12th
Amusing.Do you understand how RFA works? haha
Why are you talking about Hill?Helps that both were uncontracted and Sydney need to shed cap space. That’s not the case with Whitfield and Hill and while you guys think GWS are going to let Coniglio walk for pick 15, the rest of us interpret the words differently.
Any bet you want to do that you don’t get two of Coniglio, Hill and Whitfield this year
Relevance to the discussion? Zero.
A lot of that stems from the situation for example a higher team poaching a lower teams asset for example T Lynch and Rich. The asset Rich could offer wasnt better than the AFL listed compo so that made sense. Your first pick is better than the AFL listed comp so that would be going to GWS in any potential trade. That would be the starting point for the trade and you would be throwing more than that into the trade IF coniglio chooses Hawthorn. If you think you are signing him without giving away compensation you are delusionalAmusing.
Maybe you can provide a list of times where a FA contract has been matched?
It shouldn’t take you long.
Greater Western Sydney CEO David Matthews said the club wouldn’t hold Coniglio against his will if he requests a trade at the end of the season.A lot of that stems from the situation for example a higher team poaching a lower teams asset for example T Lynch and Rich. The asset Rich could offer wasnt better than the AFL listed compo so that made sense. Your first pick is better than the AFL listed comp so that would be going to GWS in any potential trade. That would be the starting point for the trade and you would be throwing more than that into the trade IF coniglio chooses Hawthorn. If you think you are signing him without giving away compensation you are delusional