I know that they fill in different positions, the selectors must pick players in accordance to the conditions and there is a different quality of depth in their positions, but its so unjust that Haddin keeps putting in subpar performances (admittedly, this test wasn't so bad with the gloves) and maintains his spot, whilst Starc is dropped after his second test on the back of a very good performance.
That's cricket i guess
Starc performed far better this test than I've seen in his previous games and his shield appearances that I managed to see.
I think a bit like Lehmann a decade ago, this fellow is coming along at the wrong time.
His selection is based on injury and a need for 4 pacemen, a good decision in the end. I would have erred and included Lyon. (TBH I would take o'keefe if could

)
with a full set of bowlers to select from he'll slip down the order.
Cummins is clearly 'the chosen one' given his test selection on the basis of a 20 over game, and pattinson similarly has been given the tap on the shoulder and told he's got a test career on the basis of a handful of good FC games.
Siddle is in such good form at the moment it would be obscene to drop him.
Hilfenhaus is in brilliant and dominant form he's got the indians rattled.
harris has 50 odd wickets at 18, how can you even think of leaving him out. Bowled well without luck this match, could easily have had 2 or 3 more wickets.
that said, starc has had 1 good game and a couple of ordinary ones, and it was the WACA. Would have to prove himself further in shield cricket or depend on injuries to ensure continued selection.
Lyon has a swag of wickets at 25 ish which is damn impressive given his ordinary shield form and the fact he's an offie.