Changes vs Collingwood @ MCG

[Forzaport]

Im alright with this. This week. We have no polec, no amon. We need outside runners. White fits the bill. Im fine with this, this week.

Agreed. This week it is entirely appropriate to play White.

I reckon there would be far fewer melts if we play Howard or Eddy over Impey or Neade.

 

[finbarr]

I hope Matty White comes in and kicks 10 goals and wins the Brownlow medal.


Hope is all I have left.

All he'll need is 10 clumsy touches for Hinkley to declare the inclusion justified. Let's face it, Ken's had his finger on the White trigger for weeks and has been itching to pull it. He'll more or less be a fixture in the side now.

 

[Macca19]

I agree with not going the extra tall, but why not pick Bonner or Drew or even Atley? It's going to be 13 degrees with showers tomorrow, maybe another contested ball winner would be handy.

The selection or non-selection of White shouldn't influence the result anyway but why not give a kid a game in that case? White had 6 touches last week. Ken said last week he's not afraid the play the kids. Ken, yes you are.

#rewardingform

White has averaged around 19 touches and a goal a game over the last month. Hes not been getting 6 touches every week

 

[chiwigi]

We bring in Pittard, presumably to play wing

We have a half back flanker get injured, so we bring our arguably best half back flank when in form from the wing to down back
Then you have an option on the wing and you have
Howard a young KPP coming off 8 touches
Ah chee , inside mid who has been exposed playing playing HFF at afl level
White, coming off a poor six touches game granted, but has been thrown around at sanfl level and had the extra burden of captain what clearly didn't suit him. But clearly the next option in the depth for outside players especially considering the two above.

Did white deserve to be an emergency? Debatable
Was there a better option from the emergency list given the circumstances
I'm going with a strong no

It is very easy (and relatively cheap) to simply use another.

 

[manureid]

Agreed. This week it is entirely appropriate to play White.

I reckon there would be far fewer melts if we play Howard or Eddy over Impey or Neade.

Cos he is killing it in the 2's right?

 

[Lagooner]

All he'll need is 10 clumsy touches for Hinkley to declare the inclusion justified. Let's face it, Ken's had his finger on the White trigger for weeks and has been itching to pull it. He'll more or less be a fixture in the side now.

Yeah first game back Matty's a bit rusty but did some nice things...

 

[Coobk001]

Well why not put in Bonner if you want speed

#bonnerforwing

Couple more games on the wing in the SANFL and he'll be good to go

 

[manureid]

Did white deserve to be an emergency? Debatable
Was there a better option from the emergency list given the circumstances
I'm going with a strong no

Here is an idea. When you have a player in doubt, when you name your emergencies, name a suitable replacement. You have 3 shots at getting it right. We are supposed to be a professional sporting organisation!

 

[Eddie Dingle]

All he'll need is 10 clumsy touches for Hinkley to declare the inclusion justified. Let's face it, Ken's had his finger on the White trigger for weeks and has been itching to pull it. He'll more or less be a fixture in the side now.

Collingwood are going to jump out of the blocks get a 5 goal lead and maintain it all day.

Ken will justify his selections on us staying in it despite a slow start that he can't figure out.

Kill me now please.

 

[Macca19]

Wheres the faith people??!?!?

 

[finbarr]

Yeah first game back Matty's a bit rusty but did some nice things...

And he has to play against his old team next week.....

 

[Jonts]

Here is an idea. When you have a player in doubt, when you name your emergencies, name a suitable replacement. You have 3 shots at getting it right. We are supposed to be a professional sporting organisation!

Yeah no arguements here. But white was the best option out of the three

 

[StuMan]

Nah, this is ****ed.
Anyone who saw the Maggies play knows White was ****ing anonymous.

Smells of Redden against Sydney in 2015.

 

[Jonts]

Here is an idea. When you have a player in doubt, when you name your emergencies, name a suitable replacement. You have 3 shots at getting it right. We are supposed to be a professional sporting organisation!

20k fine. Happened to north in 2011 (or2010?)

Didn't we only have 14K profit last year?

 

[manureid]

20k fine. Happened to north in 2011 (or2010?)

Didn't we only have 14K profit last year?

Dunno? Name better emergencies, like I said.

 

[Grandaddy J]

You or I could get 6 ****ing touches in a full game of SANFL football. Brett Eddy had as many goals as Matt White had touches.

Dunno how Janus would rack up any touches with both hands down Kenny's pants

 

[Lagooner]

White has averaged around 19 touches and a goal a game over the last month. Hes not been getting 6 touches every week

He had 11 touches 0.0 against GWS. He didn't have much influence that game and there's really nothing to suggest that tomorrow will prove any different.

 

[Jonts]

Dunno? Name better emergencies, like I said.

No issues with that read my post on the last page

 

[Forzaport]

Cos he is killing it in the 2's right?

His SANFL form has been fine. People are zeroing in on last week which is not reflective of his overall form.

 

[Willsy10]

So it is Matt White's turn to get roasted this week about his selection before he even gets the chance to pull his boots on.

Would've been nice to see a debut of Atley and Drew or Palmer back in to the side but the 2 out for the 2 in is reasonably balanced. Why would've the club kept Matt White on the list if they weren't prepared to give him a run.

I prefer to give players a chance before losing the plot. If he plays like shit and we lose, that is when i'll melt.

 

[Forzaport]

He had 11 touches 0.0 against GWS. He didn't have much influence that game and there's really nothing to suggest that tomorrow will prove any different.

IMO it was the wrong decision to select White for the GWS game not just because he was wrong type of player to bring in, but also because he was underdone.

He should at the very least offer more this weekend than what he offered against GWS.

 

[manureid]

So it is Matt White's turn to get roasted this week about his selection before he even gets the chance to pull his boots on.

Would've been nice to see a debut of Atley and Drew or Palmer back in to the side but the 2 out for the 2 in is reasonably balanced. Why would've the club kept Matt White on the list if they weren't prepared to give him a run.

I prefer to give players a chance before losing the plot. If he plays like shit and we lose, that is when i'll melt.

Played against GWS. Did 3 parts of fckall. Meanwhile, a few guys putting good bodies of form together in the 2's and not even getting a browse at.

Also, elevated Eddy. Why? Not prepared to give him a run in and undersized forward line.

 

[PatientMental]

I think Hinkley has officially moved Westhoff entirely out of the forward line.

Times lined up on wing for centre circle bounce v brisbane.

Westhoff - 23
Polec - 18
Boak - 12
Neade - 2
Broadbent - 2
S.Gray - 1

 

[BornPort]

An absolutely horrendous selection but despite Ken's obvious incompetence I still think we'll beat Collingwood.

 

[Willsy10]

Played against GWS. Did 3 parts of fckall. Meanwhile, a few guys putting good bodies of form together in the 2's and not even getting a browse at.

Also, elevated Eddy. Why? Not prepared to give him a run in and undersized forward line.

i really don't care this much about selection dude, i just care about winning, and going by my watch the game hasn't even started.